Search results
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Page title matches
- ...that given by {{bib|Lattes 1901}}: p. 1137 in the publication of slab A's inscription. Lattes, citing from Francesco Pellegrini's letters (written in 1896), writ ...and language. Due to the clearly Etruscoid character of the language, the inscription was used as evidence for the connection of Raetic with Etruscan, but was ev15 KB (2,445 words) - 23:43, 18 March 2020
Page text matches
- ..._object=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[object::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}}) ...t_plain=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[script::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}})2 KB (284 words) - 23:03, 17 May 2016
- {{inscription ...isible (height about 7.5 cm), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.655 bytes (80 words) - 20:40, 8 November 2021
- [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Us||Ud]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::U2s||U2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain3 KB (470 words) - 01:16, 27 January 2016
- {{inscription ...are left (height about 5 cm). No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.673 bytes (83 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
- [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ps||Pd]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::P2s||P2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain3 KB (434 words) - 00:59, 27 January 2016
- [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ls||Ld]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::L2s||L2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain3 KB (358 words) - 01:03, 27 January 2016
- {{inscription ...ture of [[index::AK-1.17]]?), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.722 bytes (92 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
- ...c}}: 397 with fig. (an attempt of reading and interpretation of the entire inscription).1 KB (197 words) - 15:16, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription ...iption length 2.2 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-27.2|another, identical inscription]].768 bytes (93 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...9.2 cm), but no reading can be offered. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription.756 bytes (99 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
- The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 [[Category:Non-inscription]]509 bytes (70 words) - 14:46, 29 June 2020
- {{inscription ...belong to [[index::AK-1.12]]. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.816 bytes (104 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...le despite corrosion. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.2|another, identical inscription]].770 bytes (100 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...white inlay, is left. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.1|another, identical inscription]].764 bytes (102 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.1|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.771 bytes (95 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...bowl]]), {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} included the inscription twice: SA-81 is the inscription as published by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, SA-101 as he saw it at the [[index::994 bytes (127 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...7 potsherd|potsherd]], mentions only [[index::SZ-27.1|the other, identical inscription]] on the [[index::SZ-27 potsherd|object]].787 bytes (105 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.2|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.798 bytes (101 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
- Concordance of TIR [[:Category:Inscription|inscription]] sigla with those used in the {{bib|PID|Pre-Italic Dialects of Italy (PID) {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]]|mainlabel=TIR|sort=sortform|?sigla_pid=PID|?sigla_ir=IR|?sigla_mancini=LI847 bytes (111 words) - 18:22, 6 November 2021
- {{inscription ...t traces before and after it. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.832 bytes (116 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...entification with {{bib|PID}} 207 b, and assigned the sigla SA-50 a to the inscription published in {{bib|PID}}, SA-50 b to the one seen by him.1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ....2 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ....1 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|sort=sortform|format=ol|?text_plain=|limit=1000}}121 bytes (14 words) - 03:33, 12 August 2013
- {{inscription ...rranged into a Lepontic "butterfly" san. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription. In any case, no reading can be offered.1 KB (158 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ....4 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.610 bytes (77 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ....9 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.610 bytes (77 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...the frame lines, possibly followed by a frame line marking the end of the inscription.1 KB (172 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...eceded by {{c||S|d}}. No further reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.900 bytes (122 words) - 20:36, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...osion, but the reading {{w||þine}} is supported by [[index::SZ-33|the same inscription occurring in the same place on another iron farming implement]].936 bytes (124 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...an be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratch952 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-9 in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|Schumacher 2004|2004}}.633 bytes (75 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...are fairly well distinguishable, though the white inlay is misleading. The inscription features additional little crosses similar to [[index::SZ-44.1]].942 bytes (123 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...r and connected with a horizontal line on top, indicate the presence of an inscription (length 79 cm). No reading can be offered.937 bytes (130 words) - 20:41, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ve the preserved ones; in light of the above considerations concerning the inscription's original length, we prefer {{p||e}} as the typical auslaut of Raetic indi2 KB (391 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 7.0 cm. The inscription is in excellent condition, the reading is unambiguous.1 KB (167 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
- ...of the type Almgren 65 with a Raetic inscription. For fibulae with Raetic inscription see in particular ''Liste I: Almgren 65'' and table 2.653 bytes (99 words) - 14:36, 8 January 2015
- {{inscription ...Raetic context and may be an import and/or indicate a recent date for the inscription.1 KB (215 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}200 bytes (22 words) - 15:21, 28 February 2014
- {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-10 (the first of the two) in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|S749 bytes (96 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ft {{c||I}}, incised before burning, is part of the ornamentation, not the inscription.706 bytes (96 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...w||upi}} supports the reading. Very probably an [[index::SZ-88.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.766 bytes (101 words) - 23:26, 13 December 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}219 bytes (26 words) - 12:35, 24 January 2014
- ...axe]]|format=count}}x), mostly from [[index::Sanzeno]] ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]][[object.site::Sanzeno]]|format=count}}x). {{c||L}} ...hasta in writing direction shortened). They are always accompanied by the inscription {{w||uθiiθi}}.3 KB (447 words) - 13:41, 12 May 2016
- {{inscription ...valley. Also the shape of the sherd suggests that on the upright bowl the inscription was seen as shown in the drawing.1 KB (209 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 2.1 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]]733 bytes (93 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length 1.9 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-79.1|an identical inscription on the opposite side]].693 bytes (88 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...m, are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.1 KB (162 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
- |title=L'Inscription Rétique de Castelcies228 bytes (26 words) - 15:21, 16 January 2014
- {{inscription ...e at the right breaking edge, at a distance of about a centimeter from the inscription.765 bytes (103 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...from {{bib|PID}}, while SA-55 was seen by him but not identified with the inscription on {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s "chisel". Independently of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}1 KB (163 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- ...ccordance with Marstrander's reading and interpretation in April 2020. The inscription is now filed in ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univ [[Category:Non-inscription]]1 KB (199 words) - 21:10, 23 April 2020
- {{inscription Length 1.1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.1|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on773 bytes (101 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 2.6 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-46.2]]762 bytes (97 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...t. Possibly non- or pseudo-script; maybe Latin (two potsherds with a Latin inscription come from the same context). See [[index::Non-script notational systems]].1 KB (175 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Length 1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.2|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on772 bytes (101 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]103 bytes (11 words) - 20:58, 6 December 2016
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]103 bytes (11 words) - 14:14, 4 January 2014
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]101 bytes (11 words) - 14:43, 18 January 2016
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]103 bytes (11 words) - 11:24, 16 September 2014
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]101 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 18 January 2016
- [[Category:Non-inscription]]103 bytes (11 words) - 20:26, 3 January 2015
- {{inscription ...taller than {{c|Χ|Χ3}} and also {{c||I}}. Apart from the shape of Khi, the inscription is identical to [[index::SZ-17]], including tall Sigma with the upper angle1 KB (165 words) - 21:44, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...overse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight1 KB (195 words) - 20:49, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...also above the curved crack – it is not possible to determine how far the inscription extended. No further reading can be offered.1 KB (178 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...d bars of {{c||E3|d}}, an interpretation of the group as the remains of an inscription is not unlikely (but note the superfluous small straight bar between the cu1 KB (170 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo and transcription of the inscription).1 KB (178 words) - 20:53, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2}}. Probably an owner's inscription.2 KB (212 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ndex::SZ-73.2|letters on the other side of the neck-guard]] are a discrete inscription.1 KB (168 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...nscription, an asterisk {{c||symbol2}}. {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, who saw the inscription in 1923, read (dextroverse) ''kuθ''[. Compare [[index::SZ-65.1]] / [[index1 KB (161 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...possibly part of a longer sequence. Assuming that the orientation of this inscription is in accordance with that of [[index::VN-14.1]], we should be faced with t879 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...a is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]] and [[index::SZ-46.2]]. Besides the inscription, two symbols {{c|symbol|symbol2}} (the top half missing) and {{c|symbol}} (814 bytes (113 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 1.9 cm. The characters are unambiguous and clearly visible despite c805 bytes (101 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete for unknown reasons. The fragmentary2 KB (257 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...he left, but unambiguous. Based on comparison with [[index::BZ-25.2]], the inscription is probably complete.845 bytes (115 words) - 17:33, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 1.3 cm. If the characters are letters, the two oblique strokes visib801 bytes (97 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 2.5 cm. The left half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguisha822 bytes (107 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 3.9 cm. The top half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguishab824 bytes (112 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 2.2 cm. The white inlay does not fill all the clearly visible stroke835 bytes (104 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...7|Franz}} to read the St. Andrew's cross as {{c||symbol}} and classing the inscription as one of his "Reitia-Inschriften".798 bytes (104 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Hardly readably due to corrosion, but apparently the inscription does not belong with [[index::uθiiθi|this group]].881 bytes (105 words) - 21:51, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...uous; the closeness of the breaking edge to the last letter allows for the inscription to have continued beyond that point.1 KB (179 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...tinguishable due to heavy corrosion, but compare [[index::SZ-79.2|the same inscription repeated on the object]] as well as other occurrences of {{w||upi}}.820 bytes (113 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription The remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 4, to the immediate right of [[index::AK-1.12]], sharing a fr974 bytes (122 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
- Recurring as a one-word "inscription" in the same place on ceramics from [[index::Sanzeno]]. An abbreviation / f219 bytes (28 words) - 16:21, 11 March 2014
- {{inscription Inscription length 1.8 cm. SZ-45.2 differs from the [[index::la|similar inscriptions on886 bytes (120 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 1.3 cm. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-47]]. See [[index::???|here]] for875 bytes (115 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ib|PID|Whatmough}} sub "Addenda" – nobody seems to have examined object or inscription since the original publication, which contains only a schematic rendering o962 bytes (131 words) - 21:00, 8 November 2021
- |subtitle=A comprehensive analysis of inscription and decorative program313 bytes (37 words) - 00:35, 17 March 2020
- {{inscription The heavily eroded remains of an inscription running vertically from the foot of the rock upwards, slightly to the right948 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- Documented only once in a Latinoid inscription; for problems with the reading see [[index::BZ-24|there]].296 bytes (37 words) - 17:53, 1 June 2015
- {{inscription ...character in the centre is probably misrepresented. In light of the recent inscription finds from [[index::Bostel]], AS-1 may have (had) linguistic content, but w2 KB (250 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ee {{w||la}}). The object bears [[index::SZ-57.2|another, almost identical inscription]].896 bytes (114 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 4.2 cm. The characters may be incomplete in the lower part, but it i870 bytes (120 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...as applied to the vessel), to the right of the centre (when looking at the inscription upright). Well legible despite the white inlay, much of which has crumbled2 KB (339 words) - 20:52, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ght, only an angle {{c||U3}} is left. While it cannot be excluded that the inscription is incomplete, cp. the group of scratchings on Sanzeno bowls discussed sub926 bytes (124 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ght. If the preserved letters constitute only the end of what was a longer inscription, it may have been a name in the [[index::-si|pertinentive case]].1 KB (194 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Only the upper or lower part of the inscription is left: two strokes, a chevron and probably two more strokes. {{bib|Franz984 bytes (134 words) - 20:55, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...T rock|Steinberg]]. We can therefore assume that the illegible part of the inscription contained at least the personal name base for the patronym.1 KB (214 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 3 cm. SZ-45.1 differs from the [[index::uθiiθi|similar inscription909 bytes (127 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...yllabic punctuation does not seem to be executed consistently. The present inscription is the only one of the group which has the sequence representing the verbal2 KB (275 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Length of the remains 2.1 cm. Although there might be some of the inscription missing on the left side, what can be seen is symmetrical (judging by {{bib988 bytes (128 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- ...cups from [[index::Rotzo]], twice in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Probably a manufacturer's mark.256 bytes (31 words) - 14:03, 9 November 2015
- {{inscription ...possible comparanda on axe heads and elsewhere. As on [[index::SZ-76.1|the inscription on the other side of the object]], a bar without inlay can be made out, her922 bytes (135 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length about 5 cm. Judging by the drawings, the inscription is much damaged by holes or abrasions on the surface. On the end with less966 bytes (122 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- ...r as well as Mancini and Schumacher only with regard to the [[index::SZ-40|inscription]].1 KB (125 words) - 15:23, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription ...}, but these might be unintentional; they certainly do not belong with the inscription. {{w||χarse}} is most easily interpreted as a Raetic individual name in th2 KB (340 words) - 21:21, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...remarks, given context and dating, BZ-17 is highly unlikely to be a Raetic inscription, but belongs with the assortment of characters often found on bronze axes f1 KB (192 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...s end of the object is situated under the bars of this last letter, so the inscription can miss one or two letters at most (unless it went on on the other grip pl2 KB (318 words) - 21:58, 8 November 2021
- ...a]], Sigma sometimes occurs both sinistroverse and dextroverse in the same inscription (e.g. [[index::WE-3]]). The prevalent orientation, however, is with the upp1 KB (156 words) - 13:54, 28 April 2016
- {{inscription ...torso, length 1.8 cm. Much more faintly embossed than [[index::SZ-8.1|the inscription on the front]]. A character like {{c||A3|d}} with elongated bar and the lef951 bytes (128 words) - 23:13, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 1.2 cm. The characters are unambiguous and clearly visible despite c994 bytes (132 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 3 cm. No white inlay in the third bar of {{c||E}}. After {{c||E}} a983 bytes (141 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...however, too much inclined to indicate a hasta. Cp. the probably identical inscription [[index::VN-3]].1 KB (216 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...e upper edge, the inscription is probably best regarded as a sinistroverse inscription as shown in the TIR images.2 KB (271 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- Possibly attested in an alphabetically Camunic inscription '''lauisiouiesuleiaklalau''' on a bronze spit from Sabbio Chiese, see Marin345 bytes (40 words) - 14:45, 2 May 2023
- ...eno]].<br>In {{bib|Franz 1959}} only a transcription of the [[index::SZ-36|inscription]] (cp. {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228, pl. 3.7).<br>Autopsied by the ''Thesaurus I1 KB (147 words) - 15:09, 2 October 2015
- {{inscription ...f course phonetically unfavourable, especially seeing as the ending of the inscription in -{{p||i}}{{p||e}} suggests a Raetic individual name and hence linguistic2 KB (273 words) - 21:01, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...acher}} kept the fragments separate, and therefore failed to recognise the inscription. Our reading based on the alignment of the fragments by the project's illus2 KB (292 words) - 18:16, 6 November 2021
- Attested twice in the same inscription; obscure. Possibly a noun – see [[index::The Raetic language]] for a disc316 bytes (43 words) - 18:27, 5 October 2015
- {{inscription ...the intersecting lines at a right angle, and turned 45° in relation to the inscription.1 KB (150 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...probably due to the curvature of the handle. Compare the almost identical inscription [[index::SZ-38]] on an iron knife – a manufacturer's mark?1 KB (143 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...o tentatively reading the middle section {{w||valen}}. The very end of the inscription is hard to read: Two somewhat curious wiggles, darker in colour than the st2 KB (333 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Length 2.5 cm. Probably an owner's inscription.1 KB (138 words) - 22:16, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ranz}}, suggests that the bowl was inscribed this way. Probably an owner's inscription.2 KB (226 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...er a slip of the tool used for embossing, or entirely unconnected with the inscription. The same goes for what looks like one or even two indentations right below3 KB (488 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 5.2 cm. SZ-44.1 differs from the [[index::uθiiθi|similar inscripti1 KB (164 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...bronze's base; length about 2.8 cm. {{bib|Schumacher 1994}} describes the inscription as follows: A hasta, damaged on top by corrosion, followed by a bar {{c||li2 KB (306 words) - 23:00, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length 3.4 cm – the inscription takes up the entire (inscribable) space on the object. The letters are clea1 KB (158 words) - 21:57, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Inscription length 3.3 cm. Heavily corroded, only traces of characters are visible. The1 KB (160 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...y after this, the three letters {{c||H2|d}}{{c||A|d}}{{c||L2}}. The entire inscription is well readable and unambiguous, but the relation of the various parts is2 KB (276 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...antler piece. With deeply incised letters on a well preserved object, the inscription is in excellent condition and very well legible. Tau is damaged by a break,2 KB (226 words) - 21:10, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar1 KB (205 words) - 19:39, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription ...punctuation mark" may not be intentional – comparing it to the rest of the inscription is impossible due to a black inlay in the letters.1 KB (172 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ngle of {{c||P|d}} and crossing one if the hastae of {{c||Θ|d}}. The whole inscription might only be pseudo-script. The main point supporting the reading is the g2 KB (252 words) - 21:59, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...re highly unlikely to be intentionally carved, and considers ST-7 a pseudo-inscription. See also {{bib|Schumacher & Salomon 2019}}: 173.2 KB (232 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...above the inscription is covered in moss; it cannot be ascertained how far inscription and frame lines extend towards the top. The right and more distinct one see2 KB (355 words) - 20:36, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ermined; none of the preserved fragments is a part of the shoulder without inscription. The lines are about 1.5 mm in breadth; the order in which they were impres3 KB (573 words) - 22:17, 8 November 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[sigla_mlr::+]]|mainlabel=-|?sigla_mlr=MLR|?=TIR|sort=sortform_mlr|format470 bytes (56 words) - 11:39, 28 September 2015
- {{inscription ...nce is obscure. A short vertical scratch is situated at 1.8 cm left of the inscription in the lower area of the surface.1 KB (148 words) - 21:59, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...blique line is left – possibly {{c||U}} or {{c||U2}}, depending on how the inscription is turned, another {{c||Θ}}, or {{c||A|d}} (cp. [[index::VN-19]]). Non-scr1 KB (151 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...gh more potsherds bearing non-script marks were found in this context, the inscription does appear to contain proper letters. Possibly the ending of an individual1 KB (165 words) - 20:53, 8 November 2021
- |dimension=Reconstructed height: 30.9 cm, length (inscription): 24 cm, thickness: 0.5 mm. <br><br>Dimensions of the different fragments:< ...ton were exposed with the inside facing upwards so that the [[index::SZ-30|inscription]] is visible. Only the non inscribed fragment I is exposed in the exact way4 KB (654 words) - 15:34, 1 October 2015
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[sigla_tm::+]]|mainlabel=-|?sigla_tm=TM|?=TIR|sort=sortform_tm|format=tab510 bytes (63 words) - 18:04, 6 November 2021
- {{inscription ..., can be interpreted as part of the hasta (most of the longer lines in the inscription appear to be made up of multiple segments), or be combined with the bar to1 KB (179 words) - 21:57, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...that of {{m||-le|-ale}}, though damaged by a crack. The two Sigmas of this inscription have opposite orientation although they are separated only by two letters.3 KB (449 words) - 22:17, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...the rider's leg; length about 2 cm. {{bib|Schumacher 1994}} describes the inscription as follows (looking at the letters upright, with the object upside-down): {2 KB (318 words) - 23:00, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...rk is a vertical row of six very short horizontal scratches separating the inscription into two parts which may be argued to be intended as identical, excepting t3 KB (424 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[sigla_ir::+]]|mainlabel=-|?sigla_ir=IR|?=TIR|sort=sortform_ir|format=tab479 bytes (57 words) - 21:19, 27 August 2015
- {{inscription ...these two characters, a smaller {{c||E}} is inserted. After {{c||Θ}}, the inscription proceeds with unambiguous letters. Note that Lambda appears in its Sanzeno-3 KB (442 words) - 17:25, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...d {{w||ali}} with inverted Alpha, but comparison with [[index::SZ-39.1|the inscription]] on the other side of [[index::SZ-39 axe|the object]] suggests that the fi1 KB (179 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
- ...{m||-l(a)}}, see the morpheme page for a discussion. See the [[index::PA-1|inscription page]] for possible functions in context. Cp. ]''kaia''[ on [[index::IT-5]]331 bytes (44 words) - 01:10, 13 February 2017
- {{inscription ...readth of the bottom; length about 7.5 cm. The object is restored, but the inscription is written on three different fragments in different states of preservation2 KB (314 words) - 20:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...se cases, [[index::SZ-39 axe|the object]] bears a [[index::SZ-39.2|similar inscription]] on the other side.2 KB (260 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length of the remains about 3 cm. The inscription is included into the Raetic corpus for the only clearly legible letter {{c|1 KB (195 words) - 20:58, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Not previously published. The inscription was only detected belatedly on photographs made by TIR; autopsy is pending.2 KB (276 words) - 20:40, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...resumed writing, after turning the rod, at the broader end, finishing the inscription (6.5 cm) at 0.9 cm from the last letter of part 1. The separator, particula2 KB (323 words) - 21:17, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...{{c||punctuation}} at the end (inscribed). Considering the tidyness of the inscription, a repetition of the hasta of {{c||E}} can be excluded. No interpretation c2 KB (383 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (246 words) - 11:59, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription ...es the lower tip of {{c||Þ|d}}, which indicates that it was made after the inscription was applied. Final Epsilon, in opposition to the first two instances, is in2 KB (329 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (225 words) - 08:02, 27 January 2016
- {{inscription ...effect, or did not consider the direction important, cannot be judged; the inscription is treated as sinistroverse here.3 KB (553 words) - 22:29, 23 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (227 words) - 18:56, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription ...ken off, damaging initial {{c||R2}} in the top. Apart from that, stone and inscription appear to be complete. No interpretation can be offered, but note the preva1 KB (188 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ee drawing); then, a horizontal crack along the rock face. No traces of an inscription can be made out below it. A slightly curving frame line can be seen below t2 KB (305 words) - 20:41, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...above the inscription is covered in moss; it cannot be ascertained how far inscription and frame lines extend towards the top. The left and more distinct one does3 KB (420 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Listed as HU-2 in {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s corpus – the inscription was republished by {{bib|IR|Mancini}} as one of unknown provenance.1 KB (174 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...n characters). Four-stroke sigma and dextroverse orientation associate the inscription with the type-2 petrographs; cf. on [[index::AK-1 rock|this rock wall]] [[i2 KB (325 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription487 bytes (62 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[sigla_mancini::+]]|mainlabel=-|?sigla_mancini=LIR|?=TIR|sort=sortform_ma594 bytes (67 words) - 21:20, 27 August 2015
- {{inscription Length 6.2 cm. The inscription is in excellent condition, the reading is unambiguous. Depending on whether1 KB (174 words) - 21:16, 8 November 2021
- ...ass, bordering Nassereith, district Imst, at the south-west exit. The only inscription find spot on the [[index::Fern pass]] so far is situated close to the distr432 bytes (60 words) - 18:14, 29 January 2020
- {{inscription ...h might as well belong with a group of indentations or scratches under the inscription. A similar indentation may be detected under {{c||R}}, which could then als2 KB (344 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...breadth of the bottom; length about 5 cm. The object is restored, but the inscription is written on three different fragments in different states of preservation2 KB (330 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...cription contains the individual name {{w||remi}} already mentioned in the inscription on the front of the bronze ([[index::SZ-2.1]]). {{w||χariχa}} can either2 KB (289 words) - 23:09, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ted only here and the lexical meaning of the form {{w||like}} unknown, the inscription could testify to a secular present as well as to a votive offering.3 KB (415 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- ...s]] written, as well as to the [[:Category:Object|object]] which bears the inscription. If you continue to one of the word pages, you will find a list of inscript ...clicking on its name, e.g., [[Property:craftsmanship|craftsmanship]] on an inscription page. The property page contains a list of available values – telling you4 KB (636 words) - 20:14, 5 October 2022
- {{inscription ...is also found on [[index::AS-15]], in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Cp. also [[index::AS-2]]. In view of its reoccurrence in the same find pla2 KB (309 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ..., and the single vertical scratches are too far apart to suggest an actual inscription. Cp. again [[index::VN-10]], also on a bone, with three lines, one of them1 KB (206 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (244 words) - 18:43, 20 January 2016
- Fragment of the neck of a bronze vessel with hollow.<br>An [[index::NO-6|inscription]] inside.538 bytes (63 words) - 14:57, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription572 bytes (70 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- ...ription, {{w||þinake}} is written with [[index::P|Pi]] in the anlaut). The inscription [[index::MA-3]] is too much damaged to determine the context of {{c||Þ}}. ...ription]] clearly written in the Sanzeno alphabet, and in an [[index::VR-6|inscription]] from the area of Verona, which displays both Magrè and Sanzeno features.4 KB (657 words) - 15:02, 24 November 2016
- ...>''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum'' is a digital edition of the Raetic inscription corpus in the form of an interactive online platform of the MediaWiki type. | style="text-align:right;" | {{#vardefine: n | {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]]|format=count}} }}{{#var: n }}{{#vardefine: total | {{ #expr: {{ #var: tot7 KB (897 words) - 19:37, 5 October 2022
- .... Epsilon with straight bars only occurs in the [[index::TV-1.1|Castelcies inscription]] – possibly Latinoid?550 bytes (82 words) - 18:15, 11 April 2016
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[sigla_pid::+]]|mainlabel=-|?sigla_pid=PID|?=TIR|sort=sortform_pid|format596 bytes (71 words) - 21:19, 27 August 2015
- ...robably it is due to the object being turned during the application of the inscription, meaning that Nu was inscribed upright. See also [[index::BZ-2]].507 bytes (78 words) - 14:52, 11 April 2016
- {{inscription ...of the rock wall, left of the centre (Bildstelle 1). The area left of the inscription is darker and heavily eroded; the presence of more inscriptions, today unre3 KB (471 words) - 20:40, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...i 1951}}: 312 ff. (no. 9) (both {{p||ś}}{{p||χ}}); their being part of the inscription is doubted by Mancini and Schumacher. Indeed, they belong with the group of1 KB (195 words) - 23:13, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...orrectly employed, the present case is less clear: All three puncts in the inscription are per se correct, but San and Zeta ought to be punctuated as well. Genera2 KB (337 words) - 22:14, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...tters {{c||E}}{{c||L2}}{{c||A|d}}{{c||V}}{{c||U2}}. Towards the end of the inscription, a number of scratches disturbs the reading, esp. {{c||I}} and {{c||K2}} (i2 KB (377 words) - 21:18, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...well legible. We are very likely concerned with a shorter fragment of the inscription in line 1 of [[index::SR-1]]. Differences between the two inscriptions are2 KB (326 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- ...he Renaissance palace ''Palazzo Villabruna''. Here the [[index::The Feltre inscription stones|two inscribed slabs from Feltre]] are preserved. They are part of th705 bytes (95 words) - 18:34, 23 September 2015
- ...evron-shaped marks {{c||U2}}, two on the narrow end below resp. before the inscription, one below {{c||E}}. Cp. marks in the same shape on [[index::SR-3 antler]]1 KB (208 words) - 15:31, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription611 bytes (76 words) - 23:33, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...le; a reading {{c||U2}} can be excluded in Southern Raetic context. For an inscription ending in -{{p||n}}{{p||a}}{{p||s}}, cp. [[index::SR-3.1]]. However, as {{b1 KB (221 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription The inscription contains a Raetic name formula (individual name + patronym in {{m||-nu}}).1 KB (210 words) - 21:10, 8 November 2021
- ...vron-shaped marks {{c||U2}}{{c||U2}} on the broad end below and before the inscription. Cp. marks in the same shape on [[index::SR-6 antler]] and [[index::SR-9 an1 KB (206 words) - 15:19, 11 September 2015
- ...on both sides cut; on the narrow end perforated.<br>Along an [[index::NO-7|inscription]].607 bytes (71 words) - 14:57, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription ...the inscription. Punctuated Rho or Lambda indicates either the end of the inscription, or a following consonant.3 KB (436 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription613 bytes (78 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
- ...two chevron-shaped marks {{c||U2}} {{c||U2}} near the broad end below the inscription. Cp. marks in the same shape on [[index::SR-3 antler]] and [[index::SR-9 an2 KB (209 words) - 15:26, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription ...N-10]] / [[index::VN-11]] with a group {{c|A|A5}}{{c|Χ}} at the end of the inscription, also separated. Cp. also [[index::SZ-2.2]] with possible {{w||χari}}.2 KB (246 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...χ}} is dubious, but is likely to represent another word belonging with the inscription – the execution is alike; the sequence being removed from the preceding p3 KB (417 words) - 23:10, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...othing is left; after that, possibly {{c||K|d}}{{c||E|d}}. The rest of the inscription is comparatively clear.2 KB (269 words) - 17:26, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription645 bytes (81 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...1 starts at the very top, line 2 starts right under the damaged area – the inscription may have been applied after the slab was damaged. There are no traces of a3 KB (502 words) - 20:51, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...r followed Whatmough in assigning two sigla (MA-4, MA-15). In the TIR, the inscription is filed as MA-4; the siglum MA-15 is abandoned.3 KB (431 words) - 22:34, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...tion). Applied with comparatively broad strokes (~1 mm). Note that, if the inscription was not applied before the handle was attached, but with the handle lying o3 KB (402 words) - 22:57, 13 December 2021
- ...once in Sanzeno context, once in Magrè context), and once with Kappa in an inscription from the very fringe of the Raetic area. Corresponds to an Etruscan noun {{620 bytes (91 words) - 15:14, 3 November 2015
- {{inscription669 bytes (85 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- ...th the museum the Museum's Collection does not contain objects with Raetic inscription (information by the [[index::Landesmuseum Schloss Tirol / Museo Storico di664 bytes (81 words) - 12:47, 19 November 2014
- ...Mancini as well as Schumacher follow this indication and mention always an inscription on a sword. However, in reality the indicated sword is a slashing knife. Th3 KB (462 words) - 07:34, 24 April 2015
- {{inscription ...P2}} {{w||pnippipiav.i.}}. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggests possible readings {{w||il.nuapiśa2 KB (251 words) - 21:40, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription640 bytes (79 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...from [[index::Bostel]]. The longer sequence on the right may represent an inscription with linguistic content, cp. esp. [[index::AS-15]]. As {{bib|PID|Whatmough}2 KB (227 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription622 bytes (80 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...er end, there is no reason to believe that a substantial part of object or inscription is missing. The fact that the upper tip of the first {{c|A|A7}} is in evide5 KB (789 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...of characters can be seen starting from the darker area of rock above the inscription, but no reading can be offered. The first usable group consists of the lowe3 KB (533 words) - 20:33, 8 November 2021
- Documented twice on one object, where both object and inscription can be argued to have ritual character (votive, possibly invocation). We ar614 bytes (90 words) - 20:09, 5 January 2017
- {{inscription693 bytes (87 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription658 bytes (85 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription653 bytes (81 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription689 bytes (81 words) - 22:05, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...fore [[index::SZ-2.1]] was written (where the letters avoid the hole), the inscription on the back may well be a factory mark – note that [[index::SZ-15.2]] app2 KB (385 words) - 23:08, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...a number of marks (both lines, struck with a different instrument than the inscription, and dots; see drawing); cp. diverse marks on other Sanzeno bronzes.2 KB (244 words) - 21:36, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...use of {{m||-nu}} vs. {{m||-na}} indicates gender. It is probable that the inscription as given above is complete.2 KB (403 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (328 words) - 18:37, 20 January 2016
- ...isurus]]). The [[index::IT-2|inscription]] can be considered a proprietary inscription.<br>[[IT-2 potsherd|The potsherd]] was found in [[index::Himmelreich]]. Fro3 KB (384 words) - 09:57, 28 September 2015
- {{inscription696 bytes (91 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- ...psy by the team of the ''{{SITENAME}}'' have shown that the potsherds with inscription published by Whatmough with the No. 207b and No. 207c are complete extant S3 KB (504 words) - 11:32, 30 March 2016
- ...1999c}}: 66, fig. 66 a–b). Cf. now also the similar spit bearing a Camunic inscription from Sabbio Chiese ({{bib|Baioni et al. 2022}}: 770–771). ...Caudina"); if this is accurate, the Spada is the only object with a Raetic inscription from the right bank of the Adige south of Trento.2 KB (260 words) - 14:48, 2 May 2023
- ...occur sporadically all over the Raetic area; sometimes consistently in one inscription, but also mixed (e.g. [[index::IT-5]]). The very similar variants {{c||K3}}661 bytes (102 words) - 16:56, 4 April 2016
- {{inscription691 bytes (84 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription706 bytes (86 words) - 23:33, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription636 bytes (89 words) - 23:26, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ot be excluded that [[index::SR-3.1]] and SR-3.2 are two lines of the same inscription.3 KB (407 words) - 23:03, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...tion with the two lines on the narrow sides and has nothing to do with the inscription.3 KB (440 words) - 21:16, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...as Etruscoid {{p||r}} is unlikely due to the presence of {{c||addO3}}. The inscription concludes with unambiguous {{c||I}} and {{c||E}}, both as high as {{c||addS4 KB (686 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...the ending of a name in the [[index::-le|pertinentive]], in which case the inscription (and also the object) would have had to be of considerable length. Attentio2 KB (290 words) - 21:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...is not likely, seeing how diligently separators are used elsewhere in the inscription.3 KB (416 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- ...ti 1950}}: 173).<br>Further references with detailed information about the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 78–79 (No. IX), fig. IX; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 3122 KB (271 words) - 15:12, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription702 bytes (93 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ..., more deeply engraved short scratches to parallel the ones disturbing the inscription.2 KB (291 words) - 22:14, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription667 bytes (97 words) - 21:57, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription682 bytes (87 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...oppich's drawing, dismissed this reading and opted to consider it a pseudo-inscription. {{bib|Schumacher 1998b}}: 174 f. concurs with this assessment, on the grou2 KB (255 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription708 bytes (86 words) - 20:55, 8 November 2021
- ...-17|characters]] on it as decoration. Detailed photo of the [[index::SZ-17|inscription]] area in {{bib|LIR}}: 96 (SA-28).<br>In accord with Gleirscher Schumacher3 KB (452 words) - 13:03, 29 September 2015
- {{inscription ...tions of inscriptions with doubtful status.) Note in this context that the inscription was applied before firing.2 KB (286 words) - 22:16, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription681 bytes (94 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...e'. The latter is unlikely, as this would be the only case of a "speaking" inscription in Raetic; {{w||muiu}} is only vaguely reminiscent of Etruscan accusatives3 KB (384 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...the beaker, the tops of the letters pointing towards the foot. The entire inscription measures about 12 cm, the characters take up the entire breadth of the bott2 KB (306 words) - 17:24, 13 December 2021
- ...schist. Perforated a number of times without respecting the [[index::PU-4|inscription]].742 bytes (92 words) - 12:49, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...h wall, where it had been placed with the [[index::TV-1.1|allegedly Raetic inscription]] facing outward. {{bib|Pellegrini 1964|Pellegrini}}, who was the first to6 KB (958 words) - 20:29, 23 November 2021
- {{inscription773 bytes (89 words) - 21:40, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ith [[index::CE-1.4]] ''kusenku''(''s''). Four-stroke sigma associates the inscription with the type-2 petrographs (see [[index::Raetic epigraphy]]).3 KB (441 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription714 bytes (98 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription764 bytes (91 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Only two letters are legible. The inscription appears to start with a character of which only the lower part of a hasta p2 KB (292 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...characters, but not quite in line with the row of letters described – the inscription probably ends at the crack.4 KB (678 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- ...reconstruction of the cist (drawing) see {{bib|Mérey-Kádar 1958}}.<br> The inscription is situated on the rim of the pail.749 bytes (97 words) - 16:10, 27 October 2015
- {{inscription ...nd [[index::MA-14]]) with a sloppily executed hasta. No other lines in the inscription are unduly curved, but the letter should be expected to be punctuated just3 KB (417 words) - 21:09, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription743 bytes (96 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription741 bytes (96 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription803 bytes (115 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription746 bytes (102 words) - 21:55, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription801 bytes (107 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription720 bytes (95 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...etter(s). The distance between this fragment and the preserved part of the inscription cannot be securely determined, but was probably not quite as long as sugges4 KB (649 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ghtly dislocated after the restoration of the object. The execution of the inscription is not particularly tidy, in two instances resulting in problems with the r4 KB (543 words) - 22:11, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (349 words) - 19:33, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription734 bytes (101 words) - 17:33, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...e on the left, but may well be just a trick of the eye. The best-preserved inscription on [[index::AK-1 rock|this rock]] as fas as the distinctness of scratches i3 KB (479 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
- ...{{bib|Nothdurfter 2002}}: 1150).<br>Near the rounded end an [[index::SZ-48|inscription]].794 bytes (96 words) - 15:36, 2 October 2015
- {{inscription792 bytes (104 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- ...iron plaque – probably a metal fitting – of which the larger one bears the inscription.867 bytes (107 words) - 19:11, 3 April 2020
- {{inscription796 bytes (103 words) - 22:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription803 bytes (103 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...aight; it cannot be excluded that it obscures an {{c||I}}. All in all, the inscription measures about 10.5 cm. Both the sequence {{w||(k)avinχ}} and the reason f2 KB (324 words) - 20:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...as the final three letters are noticeably shorter than in the rest of the inscription, is is safer to assume that the two lines are intended as hastae – possib3 KB (450 words) - 21:10, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...proper]] on the other side of the slab – the writer may have commenced the inscription, then decided that he hadn't planned the layout correctly (less probable, s3 KB (416 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription798 bytes (93 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription804 bytes (110 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- ...Museum. The [[index::BZ-4 fragment|fragment of a bronze vessel with Raetic inscription]] is located at the Altes Museum.<br>The official postal adress of the muse966 bytes (123 words) - 09:27, 3 November 2015
- {{inscription ...The object is broken into multiple fragments; the entire upper part of the inscription is missing apart from the last two letters. For the arrangement of the lowe2 KB (310 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...egrini & Sebesta 1965|Pellegrini}} and {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, which show the inscription clearly legible despite the horizontal break. The area in the small lacuna2 KB (302 words) - 23:03, 13 December 2021
- ...The variants {{c||L3}} and {{c||L4}} only occur in a certain type of rock inscription (see [[index::Raetic epigraphy]]), indicating a connection with similar (un760 bytes (119 words) - 12:13, 12 April 2016
- {{inscription ...nd of the last group with the marks appearing next to [[index::PU-1]]. The inscription may well be a factory mark – note that [[index::SZ-1.2]] is written on a2 KB (297 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription A sequence ''pχθ''[ is highly unlikely (assuming that the inscription is language-encoding). Pellegrini's reading ''piθ''[ is altogether more pl2 KB (285 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription741 bytes (105 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- ...inerary urn''", cp. {{bib|PID}}: 33).<br>On the fragment an [[index::AS-14|inscription]] (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 193 with photo; {{bib|PID}}: 33).<br>The po2 KB (322 words) - 14:56, 15 March 2016
- {{inscription794 bytes (99 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...st letter of line 2 is more deeply scratched and might not belong with the inscription (cp. the chevron-shaped marks on [[index::SR-3 antler]], [[index::SR-6 antl3 KB (448 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...nd the Early Iron Age in the South Alpine Area.<br>For objects with raetic inscription see in particular:<br>- p. 355, pl. 6.6 (= [[index::BZ-17 axe]])<br>- p. 35736 bytes (101 words) - 09:55, 11 November 2014
- {{inscription ...grini 1951}}: 315 (no. 13) stated his conviction that these constituted an inscription, though hardly legible, Mayr, who had not acknowledged the traces at all in2 KB (310 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription807 bytes (111 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription801 bytes (109 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...only refers to fragment 1; fragment 2 (formerly MA-3) is not included. The inscription erroneously referred to sub MA-3 in Marchesini's concordance (MLR 10, p. 314 KB (692 words) - 22:34, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...hen and why the characters were embossed. It is generally assumed that the inscription was applied secondarily: The situla was dismantled and inscribed, possibly6 KB (1,054 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription878 bytes (113 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- ...15.1|inscription]] in two lines, on the back side another [[index::SZ-15.2|inscription]]. The inscriptions probably first published in {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 312 KB (324 words) - 14:57, 11 September 2015
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar ...ns]]. For example the remarkable fragment of an angular harp with a Raetic inscription cp. [[index::IT-4]]: https://www.uibk.ac.at/archaeologien/forschung/arbeits4 KB (584 words) - 14:46, 26 July 2022
- {{inscription The sequence {{w||ieśula}} is obscure. The final part of the inscription {{w||t·naχe}} represents the verbal form {{w||þinaχe}}, though the spel2 KB (328 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription816 bytes (115 words) - 20:57, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...he intermediate separator must have been added by the writer of the second inscription (p. 4). SL-2.2 runs leftwards right up to the last sign of the embossed and6 KB (916 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription850 bytes (113 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...s on either side. If a factory mark, it would have been applied before the inscription, so that the writer had to arrange his letters around it. Seeing as he mana3 KB (472 words) - 23:09, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ndex::SR-3.1]] with possibly a name base {{w||aruś}}. In both parts of the inscription, the suffix {{m||-na}} is preceded by a punctuation mark, but it cannot be3 KB (547 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...iptions by Marchesini the [[SZ-24 antler|object]] resp. the [[index::SZ-24|inscription]] is listed with the indication "''Innsbuck, Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinand5 KB (739 words) - 11:41, 14 July 2015
- {{inscription853 bytes (106 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- ...ramic fragment of a bowl type Fritzens]] with a [[index::IT-2|well legible inscription]] was found in house V. However, Kasseroler states the northern section of ...}}). [[index::IT-3 potsherd|A ceramic fragment]] with [[index::IT-3|Raetic inscription]] was found during these excavations (cp. {{bib|Sinnhuber 1949}}: 64–65,3 KB (384 words) - 11:59, 11 May 2015
- {{inscription793 bytes (109 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription788 bytes (108 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (395 words) - 11:30, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription851 bytes (116 words) - 21:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...er {{c||A|d}} is equally straight and smooth, making a continuation of the inscription possible. If we are concerned with a patronymic in {{m||-nu}}, both {{m||-l2 KB (316 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription841 bytes (109 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription858 bytes (117 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- ...al irregular form. On one of the major flanks is incised an [[index::NO-10|inscription||this side]] which contains single line.<br>In default of the find context878 bytes (127 words) - 14:59, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription857 bytes (119 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription879 bytes (106 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription860 bytes (106 words) - 21:51, 8 November 2021
- ...er, an autopsy of the [[PU-10 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-10|inscription]] was not effected. The current inventory number based on the identificatio4 KB (515 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...are symmetrical, the second bar of Nu is oblique. It is unlikely that the inscription was applied together with [[index::CE-1.2]] and [[index::CE-1.3]], even if5 KB (756 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ell legible, despite problems posed by the bulges above the back fins. The inscription was applied after the hole was drilled, as the lines of second {{c||A5}} st3 KB (542 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (385 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription893 bytes (114 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- ...iption follows the indication in Lunz 1990. With particular regards to the inscription.)<br>The tombstone dates to the late Roman republican period, at the latest938 bytes (113 words) - 14:50, 10 September 2015
- {{inscription ...clear that the sequences on the situla cannot have been all applied as one inscription.3 KB (453 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription849 bytes (119 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- ...e ring]], [[index::SZ-45 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-46 scythe ring]]), the inscription is accompanied by {{w||la}} on the opposite side of the object; on [[index:891 bytes (125 words) - 16:27, 23 July 2015
- {{inscription919 bytes (123 words) - 20:55, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ibly another case of the object being turned during the application of the inscription (cp. [[index::MA-13]] and [[index::MA-17]]. Line 2 (length 7.2 cm) is somew2 KB (327 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- ...side smoothly polished; the bottom side however holed.<br>An [[index::VN-1|inscription]] along the upper side.935 bytes (116 words) - 15:42, 10 September 2015
- ...museum Ferdinandeum|Tyrolean State Museum]], and republished object(s) and inscription(s) as probably unpublished (cp. No. 63 I, II and III in the {{bib|IR}}). Th4 KB (658 words) - 09:04, 2 March 2016
- {{inscription934 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription955 bytes (126 words) - 17:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription882 bytes (123 words) - 21:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...[[index::ST rock]]), {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 46, who had not noticed the inscription during his visit, was led to suggest that ST-8 in {{bib|Joppich 1971|Joppic3 KB (456 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription939 bytes (120 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription {{bib|Risch 1989}} argues that the sherd plus inscription, together with [[index::Ardez|some more typically Raetic objects with scrat2 KB (358 words) - 20:59, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...s following the two {{c||N}}s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final {{c||T}} seen by {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} (p. 388) cannot be c6 KB (889 words) - 21:31, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription917 bytes (128 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription979 bytes (127 words) - 17:31, 13 December 2021
- ...The other side beat out in tetragonal shape.<br>Sidewise an [[index::SZ-18|inscription]].<br>According to Whatmough the object was bought in [[index::Bozen / Bolz937 bytes (124 words) - 13:07, 29 September 2015
- {{inscription ...fig. 4 (drawing), and on the [https://usepigraphy.brown.edu/projects/usep/inscription/RI.Prov.RISD.MA.Raet.32.245/ U.S. epigraphy project website] (photo).8 KB (1,299 words) - 21:37, 29 August 2022
- {{inscription ...et ''k'' ont souvent un sens contraire à celui des autres lettres". If the inscription was applied upside-down, or the writer moved the helmet around between scra5 KB (805 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription919 bytes (121 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...rate the patronymic suffix {{m||-nu}} from the base. The find place of the inscription lies between the alphabets of Sanzeno and Magrè, that is, their respective3 KB (460 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- ...s hircus'').<br>Broken at one side, perforated.<br>Along an [[index::VN-15|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d991 bytes (123 words) - 14:24, 21 September 2015
- {{inscription873 bytes (125 words) - 17:30, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...nd {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). An excellent copy of the bronze fragment and the inscription can be seen in the [[index::Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum]]. It was thi5 KB (856 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription914 bytes (134 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]] OR [[Category:Object]]|link=none|format=ul|template=index|sort=sortform|l647 bytes (77 words) - 16:15, 15 June 2019
- {{inscription ...silon (as, independently, did {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}). The lower end of the inscription is heavily damaged and spoilt by more recent scratchings, but the presence3 KB (464 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...ied.<br>Calcined, from grey to black in colour.<br>Along an [[index::VN-14|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d995 bytes (130 words) - 14:22, 21 September 2015
- Bronze plaque, seven fragments of different size.<br>An [[index::IT-5|inscription]] in five lines.<br>Marchesini dates the bronze plaque of Demlfeld to the e1,013 bytes (129 words) - 19:07, 3 April 2020
- ...estate 1951"'').<br>Further references with detailed information about the inscription: {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 315 (No. 14), fig. 14.a; {{bib|Mayr 1952}}: 176 (2 KB (351 words) - 14:56, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription933 bytes (134 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription The inscription contains a Raetic name formula (individual name + patronym in {{m||-nu}}).2 KB (338 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription954 bytes (122 words) - 21:17, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription907 bytes (131 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ance has led {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971|Prosdocimi}} (p. 31) to assume that the inscription was executed from a sample by a person who could not read it and therefore7 KB (1,056 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...g to the Late Iron Age is reasoned by the appearance of the [[index::SZ-22|inscription]].<br>Doubts in matters of the material: The literature, e.g. {{bib|Franz 12 KB (363 words) - 18:01, 1 March 2016
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (476 words) - 13:25, 22 January 2016
- {{inscription921 bytes (112 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription953 bytes (138 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- ...transcription of the inscription), however with particular regards to the inscription.<br>Autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum'' in November 2013 KB (377 words) - 11:49, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription903 bytes (127 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- ...nical circumstances; indeed [[index::SZ-30]] may be the only Transpadanian inscription which features it consistently. Where it does occur, it is often in danger1 KB (165 words) - 14:52, 11 April 2016
- {{inscription968 bytes (139 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription974 bytes (130 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...The rod is recently broken in three pieces, one of the breaks damaging the inscription in the last sector. However, the pieces still fit in with each other very n9 KB (1,481 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- Bone plate.<br>Animal bone, not further classified.<br>Along an [[index::VN-3|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone p1 KB (135 words) - 13:22, 18 September 2015
- ...in [[index::Bostel]]. Its attestation in a [[index::SR-9|language-encoding inscription]] is highly dubious. Inverted forms are not attested.1 KB (160 words) - 02:52, 22 May 2016
- {{inscription1,019 bytes (141 words) - 17:25, 13 December 2021
- ...int on the inscription. In consequence of Mancini, Schumacher arranges the inscription into the group of objects with '''''H'''erkunft '''U'''nbekannt'' (cp. {{bi4 KB (526 words) - 10:35, 18 March 2016
- {{inscription ...-8]] and [[index::MA-9]]. If {{w||esθua}} is a name in the nominative, the inscription follows the same formula as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::M4 KB (611 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- ...potsherd]]. I.e. Fiorelli presents in his summary from 1881 an object with inscription which was reported to him by Molon. Molon himself, as excavator in [[index:5 KB (744 words) - 12:13, 11 November 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (151 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription954 bytes (126 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,000 bytes (143 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,012 bytes (136 words) - 23:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,008 bytes (144 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- ...s hircus'').<br>Broken at one side, perforated.<br>Along an [[index::VN-13|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d1 KB (136 words) - 14:18, 21 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (165 words) - 22:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (151 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription982 bytes (139 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription The individual name {{w||piθie}} can be identified, the rest of the inscription is obscure. {{m||-þu}} appears to be a suffix or inflectional ending, reoc3 KB (394 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (137 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
- ...anzeno culture like the bronzes from [[index::Sanzeno]], the [[index::VR-1|inscription]] alongside below the perforation, the partly interpretation of [[index::Sa4 KB (576 words) - 23:05, 4 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (140 words) - 23:12, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (145 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (149 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length 6.7 cm. With deeply incised letters on a well preserved object, the inscription is in excellent condition and very well legible. It starts at the broad end2 KB (372 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (137 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (143 words) - 21:23, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ell visible. The two sequences are highly likely to belong together as one inscription; our arrangement of the lines is based on the interpretation (see below); s5 KB (784 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (158 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...icular focus on the inscription, however given only a transcription of the inscription (cp. {{bib|Nalli 1895}}: 258). Pellegrini compares this character with the3 KB (460 words) - 11:08, 11 May 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 21:20, 8 November 2021
- Oval stone with an [[index::SR-11|inscription]].<br>According to the picture of [[index::IT-6 stone]] in {{bib|Tischer 201 KB (145 words) - 15:33, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (141 words) - 23:10, 13 December 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133, fig. XI (Mayr labels the bronze as ''Doppelpferdch1 KB (142 words) - 14:55, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (164 words) - 20:58, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...tter appearing without the more usual {{p||u}} in the second syllable. The inscription can be tentatively translated as 'by Laθuru for Tianu(s) (a gift vel sim.?2 KB (380 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (146 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (152 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription The alphabet used in the inscription is Venetoid, with Lambda {{c||L}} and Upsilon {{c||U}}. The shape of Mu (wi4 KB (557 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (147 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 314, fig. 12; {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133 with transcr1 KB (141 words) - 15:15, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription ...nd a dot on top. The dot is executed the same way as the other dots in the inscription (in the separators and {{c||T4}}), i.e. as a small patch with the upper lay5 KB (801 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (153 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (150 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- Fragment of an antler point.<br>Remains of an [[index::SR-12|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (146 words) - 00:30, 12 November 2014
- {{inscription ...ccessed more comfortably – compare the upside-down [[index::SL-2.3]]. This inscription, however, is clearly written as seen when the helmet is worn, so the writer8 KB (1,209 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- ...n the upper side of the [[NO-1 fragment|bronze fragment]] an [[index::NO-1|inscription]] in [[index::Property:alphabet|Sanzeno alphabet]].<br>'''excavation CAMPI1 KB (158 words) - 14:37, 17 September 2015
- ...e attestation in [[index::MA-11]] suggests a nominative, assuming that the inscription follows the same pattern as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::M1 KB (202 words) - 18:20, 11 February 2017
- {{inscription1 KB (159 words) - 23:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (171 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (141 words) - 21:21, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (174 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...coration in form of a dice eye.<br>On the other longside an [[index::SZ-32|inscription]]. ...g to the Late Iron Age is reasoned by the appearance of the [[index::SZ-32|inscription]] and the general valuation of the findings made in [[index::Sanzeno]] from3 KB (418 words) - 12:21, 3 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (156 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (156 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (149 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...he Raetic inscriptions; more likely, this is a sign marking the end of the inscription. Cp. [[index::SR-4]].4 KB (606 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- ...003}}: 112; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 414).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-12|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (146 words) - 10:29, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (147 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- <br>On the rounded curve an [[index::VR-2|inscription]] where the second part after the separator probably displays a reduced for ...he [[index::VR-1 antler|larger antler]] and the here visible [[index::VR-1|inscription]]. However, it has to admit that it cannot verified if Cipolla really means4 KB (664 words) - 23:06, 4 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
- ...o the inscription. In {{bib|IR}}: 280 (No. 58) only a transcription of the inscription. In {{bib|LIR}}: 103 (No. SA-40) an insufficient detail picture of the bowl3 KB (436 words) - 11:48, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription1 KB (142 words) - 23:14, 13 December 2021
- ...003}}: 114; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 415).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-14|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (148 words) - 09:49, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (164 words) - 16:04, 14 November 2021
- ...nscription-bearing objects with relevance for studies on [[index::Category:Inscription|Raetic inscriptions as well as characters]]. The included objects are indicated with the siglum related to the inscription and the name resp. type of object. The [[Property:sigla group|various sigla4 KB (614 words) - 03:16, 4 December 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133 (No. X), fig. X (Mayr labels the bronze as ''Doppel1 KB (162 words) - 15:14, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (180 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- ...003}}: 114; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 415).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-13|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (150 words) - 10:09, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription ..., but the line delimiting the inscribed area on top, less than half of the inscription is missing. Our reconstruction of the plaque differs from Marchesini's inso7 KB (1,194 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- ...h</sup> century, but this appears to refer to a questionable dating of the inscription, not to the object.)1 KB (175 words) - 20:55, 7 April 2020
- {{inscription1 KB (158 words) - 23:12, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (177 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- ...g part of the bone has destroyed the beginning of the entire [[index::PU-6|inscription]].<br>The [[PU-6 bone|bone]] comes from the excavations executed by the [[i4 KB (514 words) - 13:20, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (189 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- ...9.2; {{bib|Fogolari 1975}}: 151<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1950}}: 407–408 (No. IV), fig. IV; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 31 KB (153 words) - 15:10, 17 September 2015
- ...characters. The missing part of the bone does not affect the [[index::PU-5|inscription]].<br>The [[PU-5 bone|bone]] comes from the excavations executed by the [[i4 KB (526 words) - 13:21, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (177 words) - 21:58, 8 November 2021
- Fragment of an antler point; perforated.<br>Remains of an [[index::SR-13|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (164 words) - 15:35, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (168 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- Antler point; scarcely curved.<br>Along an [[index::SR-8|inscription]] from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (172 words) - 15:29, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (187 words) - 21:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...d to add another petrograph in more recent times. The line drawn under the inscription has subsequently been prolonged and recycled as part of a cross.5 KB (875 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...f house H'. According the drawing by Gamper the fragmentary bone bears the inscription: ''χaris'' {{c|Þ|Þ3}}''u'' where the character {{c|Þ|Þ3}} seems to be5 KB (771 words) - 07:45, 23 May 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (189 words) - 22:14, 8 November 2021
- ...ed with siglum "MLR 220" where Marchesini erroneously indicates the object/inscription as unpublished (cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 204 [MLR 220]). Therefore the [[SZ-29 bowl5 KB (787 words) - 11:46, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription ...es on the back of a girdle plate (upside-down when the plate is worn). The inscription is in very bad condition; according to {{bib|Pellegrini 1959}}: 194 the obj9 KB (1,493 words) - 21:20, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ed afterwards for decoration.) {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} assumed that the inscription was applied after [[index::ST-3]] and was written dextroversely so as to av6 KB (1,009 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- ...ite side of the forking perforated.<br>On both long sides an [[index::SR-1|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (170 words) - 15:18, 11 September 2015
- ...ever, an autopsy of the [[PU-9 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-9|inscription]] was not effected. In consultation with the [[index::Amt für Bodendenkmä4 KB (526 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...pright) opposite the metal pegs, starting at the non-horse-shaped end. The inscription is damaged by one vertical and two horizontal cracks and abrasion (most hea5 KB (846 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...] and possibly [[index::VN-8]] with a group {{c||U2}}{{c|Θ}} following the inscription. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of poss3 KB (531 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- ...tly corroded. Broken at either end.<br>On the front side an [[index::VR-11|inscription]]; on the back side a [[index::VR-11|single character]].<br> In the recentl1 KB (169 words) - 12:19, 28 January 2016
- ...298; {{bib|Fogolari 1975}}: 151.<br>Further reference more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1950}}: 408 (No. V), fig. V; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 310–3111 KB (165 words) - 15:11, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (170 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
- ...arrow end, broken at the upper side.<br>Along remains of an [[index::SR-10|inscription]] from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (176 words) - 15:32, 11 September 2015
- ...usually corresponding to rounded forms of [[index::U|Upsilon]] in the same inscription). ...he few letters which occurs both sinistroverse and dextroverse in the same inscription with some frequency (e.g. [[index::MA-2]]). Cp. [[index::S|Sigma]]. Due to4 KB (620 words) - 14:26, 12 May 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (191 words) - 20:57, 8 November 2021
- ...perforated, but not end-to-end and vertically.<br>Along an [[index::VN-10|inscription]] in two lines.<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hi1 KB (173 words) - 13:53, 18 September 2015
- ...zeno culture cp. {{bib|Zemmer-Plank 2002}}). Because of the [[index::SZ-87|inscription]], likewise a votive offering is conceivable. A reasonably similar example3 KB (504 words) - 10:58, 17 March 2020
- ...ever, an autopsy of the [[PU-8 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-8|inscription]] was not effected. Moreover, as evinced in the case of the visit of the [[4 KB (539 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- ...e statuette stands on a small round foot, along the edge an [[index::SZ-16|inscription]].<br>The bronze statuette was discovered by chance in 1846 (cp. {{bib|Ghis1 KB (184 words) - 15:18, 17 September 2015
- ...''metacarpus'') of a pig (''Sus scrofa'').<br>On one side an [[index::VR-4|inscription]].<br>For the find circumstances cp. Luciano Salzani, Lettura di una sezion1 KB (192 words) - 13:05, 15 March 2016
- {{inscription Syllabic punctuation is applied correctly. The inscription contains a Raetic name formula (individual name + patronym in {{m||-nu}}).3 KB (502 words) - 21:09, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (183 words) - 21:35, 8 November 2021
- Antler point; at the wider end perforated.<br>Along an [[index::SR-7|inscription]] from rigth to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (182 words) - 15:28, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (199 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
- ...the left leading flank as far as the centre of the body an [[index::SZ-71|inscription||this side]].<br>The kind of full plastic work with indication of details d1 KB (194 words) - 11:34, 12 November 2016
- {{inscription ...ers, length about 7.5 cm. They may be considered to belong together as one inscription – both have Sigma turned with the upper angle opened in writing direction5 KB (876 words) - 21:27, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (209 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ion being very similar, the lines may be considered to be part of the same inscription. The letters are well legible on the comparatively undisturbed surface. In3 KB (507 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- ...r side is polished, the bottom side holed.<br>On exterior an [[index::SR-4|inscription]] in two lines, from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group1 KB (185 words) - 15:21, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (223 words) - 21:16, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (196 words) - 20:52, 8 November 2021
- ...b|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further reference probably more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 30 (No. VI), fig. VI; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 311 (No.1 KB (197 words) - 12:36, 11 September 2015
- ...5 [No. 212]). In NRIE the [[NO-5 potsherd|object]] resp. the [[index::NO-5|inscription]] are listed with No. 110: "''frammento d'osso''" (cp. {{bib|NRIE}}: 44). I6 KB (834 words) - 16:13, 1 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (196 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (203 words) - 22:05, 8 November 2021
- The ablative I itself is attested in only one inscription, inflecting the enclitic pronoun ({{w||θeis}}) and possibly the ambiguous2 KB (220 words) - 23:09, 13 February 2017
- ...he [[index::BZ-15|characters]]. According to a notice of Whatmough that an inscription bearing object was found in [[index::Eppan / Appiano]] in 1931, this object1 KB (197 words) - 14:40, 28 September 2015
- ...es and dice eyes on the handle and in part on the rim.<br>An [[index::NO-2|inscription]] outside, below the flanged edge.<br>The object came in the property of th1 KB (210 words) - 14:38, 1 September 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (191 words) - 21:14, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (212 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (204 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- ...|bronze rod]] cannot be reliably determined. Because of the [[index::SZ-96|inscription]] and the appearance of the perforations as well as the remains of the nail4 KB (583 words) - 10:51, 17 March 2020