SR-8
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | vs·eraus· |
| Original script: | |
| Variant Reading: | vsieraus· |
|
| |
| Object: | SR-8 antler (antler) |
| Position: | front |
| Script: | North Italic script (Magrè alphabet) |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Letter height: | 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.7 cm |
| Number of letters: | 7 – 8 |
| Number of characters: | 9 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | damaged |
| Date of inscription: | 3rd century BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 90 LIR SE-5 TM 218466 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 158, 338 |
Images
|
Object SR-8 antler with inscription SR-8.
|
Commentary
First published in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 14 (no. 8). Autopsied by TIR in November 2014.
Images in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 14 (drawing) and fig. 11 (photo), IR (drawing = LIR), LIR (photo).
Length 4.1 cm. The lines are deep and broad and well visible; a vertical crack damages
. While it has generally been assumed that the inscription is incomplete in the beginning, a space of 0.5 cm which holds no trace of a character separates the initial letter
from the breaking edge. The assumption that letters preceded
is probably owing to the initial consonant cluster vs-. The dubious element between
and
is a shortish vertical scratch very close to the hasta of
, which might be read i or as a punctuation mark. It may have been added belatedly, seeing as it looks wedged in between two letters which are at a regular distance of each other. In either case, it might be speculated that it was inserted in the wrong place: A punctuation mark in this place does not at all conform to the Venetic system of syllable punctuation; a letter i situated between
and
instead of
and
would solve the problem of the initial cluster. Cp. line 1 of SR-1, also with a problematic short scratch in the middle of the inscription alongside a clear punctuation mark
at the end (inscribed). Considering the tidyness of the inscription, a repetition of the hasta of
can be excluded. No interpretation can be offered.
Further references: Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 23, Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 234 ff.
Bibliography
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
|---|---|
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |