Search results
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
- {{inscription681 bytes (94 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...e'. The latter is unlikely, as this would be the only case of a "speaking" inscription in Raetic; {{w||muiu}} is only vaguely reminiscent of Etruscan accusatives3 KB (384 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...the beaker, the tops of the letters pointing towards the foot. The entire inscription measures about 12 cm, the characters take up the entire breadth of the bott2 KB (306 words) - 17:24, 13 December 2021
- ...schist. Perforated a number of times without respecting the [[index::PU-4|inscription]].742 bytes (92 words) - 12:49, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...h wall, where it had been placed with the [[index::TV-1.1|allegedly Raetic inscription]] facing outward. {{bib|Pellegrini 1964|Pellegrini}}, who was the first to6 KB (958 words) - 20:29, 23 November 2021
- {{inscription773 bytes (89 words) - 21:40, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ith [[index::CE-1.4]] ''kusenku''(''s''). Four-stroke sigma associates the inscription with the type-2 petrographs (see [[index::Raetic epigraphy]]).3 KB (441 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription714 bytes (98 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription764 bytes (91 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription Only two letters are legible. The inscription appears to start with a character of which only the lower part of a hasta p2 KB (292 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...characters, but not quite in line with the row of letters described – the inscription probably ends at the crack.4 KB (678 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- ...reconstruction of the cist (drawing) see {{bib|Mérey-Kádar 1958}}.<br> The inscription is situated on the rim of the pail.749 bytes (97 words) - 16:10, 27 October 2015
- {{inscription ...nd [[index::MA-14]]) with a sloppily executed hasta. No other lines in the inscription are unduly curved, but the letter should be expected to be punctuated just3 KB (417 words) - 21:09, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription743 bytes (96 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription741 bytes (96 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription803 bytes (115 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription746 bytes (102 words) - 21:55, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription801 bytes (107 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription720 bytes (95 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...etter(s). The distance between this fragment and the preserved part of the inscription cannot be securely determined, but was probably not quite as long as sugges4 KB (649 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ghtly dislocated after the restoration of the object. The execution of the inscription is not particularly tidy, in two instances resulting in problems with the r4 KB (543 words) - 22:11, 8 November 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar2 KB (349 words) - 19:33, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription734 bytes (101 words) - 17:33, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...e on the left, but may well be just a trick of the eye. The best-preserved inscription on [[index::AK-1 rock|this rock]] as fas as the distinctness of scratches i3 KB (479 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
- ...{{bib|Nothdurfter 2002}}: 1150).<br>Near the rounded end an [[index::SZ-48|inscription]].794 bytes (96 words) - 15:36, 2 October 2015
- {{inscription792 bytes (104 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- ...iron plaque – probably a metal fitting – of which the larger one bears the inscription.867 bytes (107 words) - 19:11, 3 April 2020
- {{inscription796 bytes (103 words) - 22:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription803 bytes (103 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...aight; it cannot be excluded that it obscures an {{c||I}}. All in all, the inscription measures about 10.5 cm. Both the sequence {{w||(k)avinχ}} and the reason f2 KB (324 words) - 20:48, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...as the final three letters are noticeably shorter than in the rest of the inscription, is is safer to assume that the two lines are intended as hastae – possib3 KB (450 words) - 21:10, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...proper]] on the other side of the slab – the writer may have commenced the inscription, then decided that he hadn't planned the layout correctly (less probable, s3 KB (416 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription798 bytes (93 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription804 bytes (110 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- ...Museum. The [[index::BZ-4 fragment|fragment of a bronze vessel with Raetic inscription]] is located at the Altes Museum.<br>The official postal adress of the muse966 bytes (123 words) - 09:27, 3 November 2015
- {{inscription ...The object is broken into multiple fragments; the entire upper part of the inscription is missing apart from the last two letters. For the arrangement of the lowe2 KB (310 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...egrini & Sebesta 1965|Pellegrini}} and {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, which show the inscription clearly legible despite the horizontal break. The area in the small lacuna2 KB (302 words) - 23:03, 13 December 2021
- ...The variants {{c||L3}} and {{c||L4}} only occur in a certain type of rock inscription (see [[index::Raetic epigraphy]]), indicating a connection with similar (un760 bytes (119 words) - 12:13, 12 April 2016
- {{inscription ...nd of the last group with the marks appearing next to [[index::PU-1]]. The inscription may well be a factory mark – note that [[index::SZ-1.2]] is written on a2 KB (297 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription A sequence ''pχθ''[ is highly unlikely (assuming that the inscription is language-encoding). Pellegrini's reading ''piθ''[ is altogether more pl2 KB (285 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription741 bytes (105 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- ...inerary urn''", cp. {{bib|PID}}: 33).<br>On the fragment an [[index::AS-14|inscription]] (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 193 with photo; {{bib|PID}}: 33).<br>The po2 KB (322 words) - 14:56, 15 March 2016
- {{inscription794 bytes (99 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...st letter of line 2 is more deeply scratched and might not belong with the inscription (cp. the chevron-shaped marks on [[index::SR-3 antler]], [[index::SR-6 antl3 KB (448 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...nd the Early Iron Age in the South Alpine Area.<br>For objects with raetic inscription see in particular:<br>- p. 355, pl. 6.6 (= [[index::BZ-17 axe]])<br>- p. 35736 bytes (101 words) - 09:55, 11 November 2014
- {{inscription ...grini 1951}}: 315 (no. 13) stated his conviction that these constituted an inscription, though hardly legible, Mayr, who had not acknowledged the traces at all in2 KB (310 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription807 bytes (111 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription801 bytes (109 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...only refers to fragment 1; fragment 2 (formerly MA-3) is not included. The inscription erroneously referred to sub MA-3 in Marchesini's concordance (MLR 10, p. 314 KB (692 words) - 22:34, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...hen and why the characters were embossed. It is generally assumed that the inscription was applied secondarily: The situla was dismantled and inscribed, possibly6 KB (1,054 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription878 bytes (113 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- ...15.1|inscription]] in two lines, on the back side another [[index::SZ-15.2|inscription]]. The inscriptions probably first published in {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 312 KB (324 words) - 14:57, 11 September 2015
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar ...ns]]. For example the remarkable fragment of an angular harp with a Raetic inscription cp. [[index::IT-4]]: https://www.uibk.ac.at/archaeologien/forschung/arbeits4 KB (584 words) - 14:46, 26 July 2022
- {{inscription The sequence {{w||ieśula}} is obscure. The final part of the inscription {{w||t·naχe}} represents the verbal form {{w||þinaχe}}, though the spel2 KB (328 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription816 bytes (115 words) - 20:57, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...he intermediate separator must have been added by the writer of the second inscription (p. 4). SL-2.2 runs leftwards right up to the last sign of the embossed and6 KB (916 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription850 bytes (113 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...s on either side. If a factory mark, it would have been applied before the inscription, so that the writer had to arrange his letters around it. Seeing as he mana3 KB (472 words) - 23:09, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ndex::SR-3.1]] with possibly a name base {{w||aruś}}. In both parts of the inscription, the suffix {{m||-na}} is preceded by a punctuation mark, but it cannot be3 KB (547 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...iptions by Marchesini the [[SZ-24 antler|object]] resp. the [[index::SZ-24|inscription]] is listed with the indication "''Innsbuck, Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinand5 KB (739 words) - 11:41, 14 July 2015
- {{inscription853 bytes (106 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- ...ramic fragment of a bowl type Fritzens]] with a [[index::IT-2|well legible inscription]] was found in house V. However, Kasseroler states the northern section of ...}}). [[index::IT-3 potsherd|A ceramic fragment]] with [[index::IT-3|Raetic inscription]] was found during these excavations (cp. {{bib|Sinnhuber 1949}}: 64–65,3 KB (384 words) - 11:59, 11 May 2015
- {{inscription793 bytes (109 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription788 bytes (108 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (395 words) - 11:30, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription851 bytes (116 words) - 21:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...er {{c||A|d}} is equally straight and smooth, making a continuation of the inscription possible. If we are concerned with a patronymic in {{m||-nu}}, both {{m||-l2 KB (316 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription841 bytes (109 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- ...al irregular form. On one of the major flanks is incised an [[index::NO-10|inscription||this side]] which contains single line.<br>In default of the find context878 bytes (127 words) - 14:59, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription858 bytes (117 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription857 bytes (119 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription879 bytes (106 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription860 bytes (106 words) - 21:51, 8 November 2021
- ...er, an autopsy of the [[PU-10 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-10|inscription]] was not effected. The current inventory number based on the identificatio4 KB (515 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...are symmetrical, the second bar of Nu is oblique. It is unlikely that the inscription was applied together with [[index::CE-1.2]] and [[index::CE-1.3]], even if5 KB (756 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ell legible, despite problems posed by the bulges above the back fins. The inscription was applied after the hole was drilled, as the lines of second {{c||A5}} st3 KB (542 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (385 words) - 19:15, 20 January 2016
- {{inscription893 bytes (114 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- ...iption follows the indication in Lunz 1990. With particular regards to the inscription.)<br>The tombstone dates to the late Roman republican period, at the latest938 bytes (113 words) - 14:50, 10 September 2015
- {{inscription ...clear that the sequences on the situla cannot have been all applied as one inscription.3 KB (453 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription849 bytes (119 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- ...e ring]], [[index::SZ-45 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-46 scythe ring]]), the inscription is accompanied by {{w||la}} on the opposite side of the object; on [[index:891 bytes (125 words) - 16:27, 23 July 2015
- {{inscription919 bytes (123 words) - 20:55, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ibly another case of the object being turned during the application of the inscription (cp. [[index::MA-13]] and [[index::MA-17]]. Line 2 (length 7.2 cm) is somew2 KB (327 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- ...side smoothly polished; the bottom side however holed.<br>An [[index::VN-1|inscription]] along the upper side.935 bytes (116 words) - 15:42, 10 September 2015
- ...museum Ferdinandeum|Tyrolean State Museum]], and republished object(s) and inscription(s) as probably unpublished (cp. No. 63 I, II and III in the {{bib|IR}}). Th4 KB (658 words) - 09:04, 2 March 2016
- {{inscription934 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription955 bytes (126 words) - 17:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription882 bytes (123 words) - 21:56, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...[[index::ST rock]]), {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 46, who had not noticed the inscription during his visit, was led to suggest that ST-8 in {{bib|Joppich 1971|Joppic3 KB (456 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription939 bytes (120 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription {{bib|Risch 1989}} argues that the sherd plus inscription, together with [[index::Ardez|some more typically Raetic objects with scrat2 KB (358 words) - 20:59, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...s following the two {{c||N}}s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final {{c||T}} seen by {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} (p. 388) cannot be c6 KB (889 words) - 21:31, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription917 bytes (128 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription979 bytes (127 words) - 17:31, 13 December 2021
- ...The other side beat out in tetragonal shape.<br>Sidewise an [[index::SZ-18|inscription]].<br>According to Whatmough the object was bought in [[index::Bozen / Bolz937 bytes (124 words) - 13:07, 29 September 2015
- {{inscription ...fig. 4 (drawing), and on the [https://usepigraphy.brown.edu/projects/usep/inscription/RI.Prov.RISD.MA.Raet.32.245/ U.S. epigraphy project website] (photo).8 KB (1,299 words) - 21:37, 29 August 2022
- {{inscription ...et ''k'' ont souvent un sens contraire à celui des autres lettres". If the inscription was applied upside-down, or the writer moved the helmet around between scra5 KB (805 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription919 bytes (121 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...rate the patronymic suffix {{m||-nu}} from the base. The find place of the inscription lies between the alphabets of Sanzeno and Magrè, that is, their respective3 KB (460 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- ...s hircus'').<br>Broken at one side, perforated.<br>Along an [[index::VN-15|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d991 bytes (123 words) - 14:24, 21 September 2015
- {{inscription873 bytes (125 words) - 17:30, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...nd {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). An excellent copy of the bronze fragment and the inscription can be seen in the [[index::Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum]]. It was thi5 KB (856 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription914 bytes (134 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]] OR [[Category:Object]]|link=none|format=ul|template=index|sort=sortform|l647 bytes (77 words) - 16:15, 15 June 2019
- {{inscription ...silon (as, independently, did {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}). The lower end of the inscription is heavily damaged and spoilt by more recent scratchings, but the presence3 KB (464 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...ied.<br>Calcined, from grey to black in colour.<br>Along an [[index::VN-14|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d995 bytes (130 words) - 14:22, 21 September 2015
- Bronze plaque, seven fragments of different size.<br>An [[index::IT-5|inscription]] in five lines.<br>Marchesini dates the bronze plaque of Demlfeld to the e1,013 bytes (129 words) - 19:07, 3 April 2020
- ...estate 1951"'').<br>Further references with detailed information about the inscription: {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 315 (No. 14), fig. 14.a; {{bib|Mayr 1952}}: 176 (2 KB (351 words) - 14:56, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription933 bytes (134 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription The inscription contains a Raetic name formula (individual name + patronym in {{m||-nu}}).2 KB (338 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription954 bytes (122 words) - 21:17, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription907 bytes (131 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ance has led {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971|Prosdocimi}} (p. 31) to assume that the inscription was executed from a sample by a person who could not read it and therefore7 KB (1,056 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...g to the Late Iron Age is reasoned by the appearance of the [[index::SZ-22|inscription]].<br>Doubts in matters of the material: The literature, e.g. {{bib|Franz 12 KB (363 words) - 18:01, 1 March 2016
- ...with characters and/or incisions which are indicated in the references as inscription and/or signs with an alphabetical character. After the autopsy of the regar3 KB (476 words) - 13:25, 22 January 2016
- {{inscription921 bytes (112 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription953 bytes (138 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- ...transcription of the inscription), however with particular regards to the inscription.<br>Autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum'' in November 2013 KB (377 words) - 11:49, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription903 bytes (127 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- ...nical circumstances; indeed [[index::SZ-30]] may be the only Transpadanian inscription which features it consistently. Where it does occur, it is often in danger1 KB (165 words) - 14:52, 11 April 2016
- {{inscription968 bytes (139 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription974 bytes (130 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...The rod is recently broken in three pieces, one of the breaks damaging the inscription in the last sector. However, the pieces still fit in with each other very n9 KB (1,481 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- Bone plate.<br>Animal bone, not further classified.<br>Along an [[index::VN-3|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone p1 KB (135 words) - 13:22, 18 September 2015
- ...in [[index::Bostel]]. Its attestation in a [[index::SR-9|language-encoding inscription]] is highly dubious. Inverted forms are not attested.1 KB (160 words) - 02:52, 22 May 2016
- {{inscription1,019 bytes (141 words) - 17:25, 13 December 2021
- ...int on the inscription. In consequence of Mancini, Schumacher arranges the inscription into the group of objects with '''''H'''erkunft '''U'''nbekannt'' (cp. {{bi4 KB (526 words) - 10:35, 18 March 2016
- {{inscription ...-8]] and [[index::MA-9]]. If {{w||esθua}} is a name in the nominative, the inscription follows the same formula as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::M4 KB (611 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- ...potsherd]]. I.e. Fiorelli presents in his summary from 1881 an object with inscription which was reported to him by Molon. Molon himself, as excavator in [[index:5 KB (744 words) - 12:13, 11 November 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (151 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription954 bytes (126 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,000 bytes (143 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,012 bytes (136 words) - 23:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1,008 bytes (144 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- ...s hircus'').<br>Broken at one side, perforated.<br>Along an [[index::VN-13|inscription]].<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hill the bone d1 KB (136 words) - 14:18, 21 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (165 words) - 22:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (151 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription982 bytes (139 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription The individual name {{w||piθie}} can be identified, the rest of the inscription is obscure. {{m||-þu}} appears to be a suffix or inflectional ending, reoc3 KB (394 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (137 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
- ...anzeno culture like the bronzes from [[index::Sanzeno]], the [[index::VR-1|inscription]] alongside below the perforation, the partly interpretation of [[index::Sa4 KB (576 words) - 23:05, 4 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (140 words) - 23:12, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (145 words) - 22:15, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (149 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription Length 6.7 cm. With deeply incised letters on a well preserved object, the inscription is in excellent condition and very well legible. It starts at the broad end2 KB (372 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (137 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (143 words) - 21:23, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ell visible. The two sequences are highly likely to belong together as one inscription; our arrangement of the lines is based on the interpretation (see below); s5 KB (784 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (158 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...icular focus on the inscription, however given only a transcription of the inscription (cp. {{bib|Nalli 1895}}: 258). Pellegrini compares this character with the3 KB (460 words) - 11:08, 11 May 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 21:20, 8 November 2021
- Oval stone with an [[index::SR-11|inscription]].<br>According to the picture of [[index::IT-6 stone]] in {{bib|Tischer 201 KB (145 words) - 15:33, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (141 words) - 23:10, 13 December 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133, fig. XI (Mayr labels the bronze as ''Doppelpferdch1 KB (142 words) - 14:55, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (164 words) - 20:58, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...tter appearing without the more usual {{p||u}} in the second syllable. The inscription can be tentatively translated as 'by Laθuru for Tianu(s) (a gift vel sim.?2 KB (380 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (146 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (152 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription The alphabet used in the inscription is Venetoid, with Lambda {{c||L}} and Upsilon {{c||U}}. The shape of Mu (wi4 KB (557 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (147 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 314, fig. 12; {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133 with transcr1 KB (141 words) - 15:15, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription ...nd a dot on top. The dot is executed the same way as the other dots in the inscription (in the separators and {{c||T4}}), i.e. as a small patch with the upper lay5 KB (801 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (153 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (150 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- Fragment of an antler point.<br>Remains of an [[index::SR-12|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (146 words) - 00:30, 12 November 2014
- {{inscription ...ccessed more comfortably – compare the upside-down [[index::SL-2.3]]. This inscription, however, is clearly written as seen when the helmet is worn, so the writer8 KB (1,209 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- ...n the upper side of the [[NO-1 fragment|bronze fragment]] an [[index::NO-1|inscription]] in [[index::Property:alphabet|Sanzeno alphabet]].<br>'''excavation CAMPI1 KB (158 words) - 14:37, 17 September 2015
- ...e attestation in [[index::MA-11]] suggests a nominative, assuming that the inscription follows the same pattern as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::M1 KB (202 words) - 18:20, 11 February 2017
- {{inscription1 KB (159 words) - 23:29, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (171 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (141 words) - 21:21, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (174 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...coration in form of a dice eye.<br>On the other longside an [[index::SZ-32|inscription]]. ...g to the Late Iron Age is reasoned by the appearance of the [[index::SZ-32|inscription]] and the general valuation of the findings made in [[index::Sanzeno]] from3 KB (418 words) - 12:21, 3 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (156 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (156 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (157 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (149 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...he Raetic inscriptions; more likely, this is a sign marking the end of the inscription. Cp. [[index::SR-4]].4 KB (606 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- ...003}}: 112; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 414).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-12|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (146 words) - 10:29, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (147 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- <br>On the rounded curve an [[index::VR-2|inscription]] where the second part after the separator probably displays a reduced for ...he [[index::VR-1 antler|larger antler]] and the here visible [[index::VR-1|inscription]]. However, it has to admit that it cannot verified if Cipolla really means4 KB (664 words) - 23:06, 4 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
- ...o the inscription. In {{bib|IR}}: 280 (No. 58) only a transcription of the inscription. In {{bib|LIR}}: 103 (No. SA-40) an insufficient detail picture of the bowl3 KB (436 words) - 11:48, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription1 KB (142 words) - 23:14, 13 December 2021
- ...003}}: 114; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 415).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-14|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (148 words) - 09:49, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (164 words) - 16:04, 14 November 2021
- ...nscription-bearing objects with relevance for studies on [[index::Category:Inscription|Raetic inscriptions as well as characters]]. The included objects are indicated with the siglum related to the inscription and the name resp. type of object. The [[Property:sigla group|various sigla4 KB (614 words) - 03:16, 4 December 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- ...04; {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 133 (No. X), fig. X (Mayr labels the bronze as ''Doppel1 KB (162 words) - 15:14, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (180 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
- ...003}}: 114; {{bib|Marinetti 2004}}: 415).<br>On one side an [[index::VR-13|inscription]].<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by March1 KB (150 words) - 10:09, 28 January 2016
- {{inscription ..., but the line delimiting the inscribed area on top, less than half of the inscription is missing. Our reconstruction of the plaque differs from Marchesini's inso7 KB (1,194 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- ...h</sup> century, but this appears to refer to a questionable dating of the inscription, not to the object.)1 KB (175 words) - 20:55, 7 April 2020
- {{inscription1 KB (158 words) - 23:12, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (177 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (166 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- ...g part of the bone has destroyed the beginning of the entire [[index::PU-6|inscription]].<br>The [[PU-6 bone|bone]] comes from the excavations executed by the [[i4 KB (514 words) - 13:20, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (189 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- ...9.2; {{bib|Fogolari 1975}}: 151<br>Further references more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1950}}: 407–408 (No. IV), fig. IV; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 31 KB (153 words) - 15:10, 17 September 2015
- ...characters. The missing part of the bone does not affect the [[index::PU-5|inscription]].<br>The [[PU-5 bone|bone]] comes from the excavations executed by the [[i4 KB (526 words) - 13:21, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (177 words) - 21:58, 8 November 2021
- Fragment of an antler point; perforated.<br>Remains of an [[index::SR-13|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (164 words) - 15:35, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (168 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- Antler point; scarcely curved.<br>Along an [[index::SR-8|inscription]] from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (172 words) - 15:29, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (187 words) - 21:04, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...d to add another petrograph in more recent times. The line drawn under the inscription has subsequently been prolonged and recycled as part of a cross.5 KB (875 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...f house H'. According the drawing by Gamper the fragmentary bone bears the inscription: ''χaris'' {{c|Þ|Þ3}}''u'' where the character {{c|Þ|Þ3}} seems to be5 KB (771 words) - 07:45, 23 May 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (189 words) - 22:14, 8 November 2021
- ...ed with siglum "MLR 220" where Marchesini erroneously indicates the object/inscription as unpublished (cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 204 [MLR 220]). Therefore the [[SZ-29 bowl5 KB (787 words) - 11:46, 16 April 2020
- {{inscription ...es on the back of a girdle plate (upside-down when the plate is worn). The inscription is in very bad condition; according to {{bib|Pellegrini 1959}}: 194 the obj9 KB (1,493 words) - 21:20, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...ed afterwards for decoration.) {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} assumed that the inscription was applied after [[index::ST-3]] and was written dextroversely so as to av6 KB (1,009 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- ...ite side of the forking perforated.<br>On both long sides an [[index::SR-1|inscription]].<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index::Montesei di Serso]1 KB (170 words) - 15:18, 11 September 2015
- ...ever, an autopsy of the [[PU-9 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-9|inscription]] was not effected. In consultation with the [[index::Amt für Bodendenkmä4 KB (526 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- {{inscription ...pright) opposite the metal pegs, starting at the non-horse-shaped end. The inscription is damaged by one vertical and two horizontal cracks and abrasion (most hea5 KB (846 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription ...] and possibly [[index::VN-8]] with a group {{c||U2}}{{c|Θ}} following the inscription. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of poss3 KB (531 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- ...tly corroded. Broken at either end.<br>On the front side an [[index::VR-11|inscription]]; on the back side a [[index::VR-11|single character]].<br> In the recentl1 KB (169 words) - 12:19, 28 January 2016
- ...298; {{bib|Fogolari 1975}}: 151.<br>Further reference more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1950}}: 408 (No. V), fig. V; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 310–3111 KB (165 words) - 15:11, 17 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (170 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
- ...arrow end, broken at the upper side.<br>Along remains of an [[index::SR-10|inscription]] from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (176 words) - 15:32, 11 September 2015
- ...usually corresponding to rounded forms of [[index::U|Upsilon]] in the same inscription). ...he few letters which occurs both sinistroverse and dextroverse in the same inscription with some frequency (e.g. [[index::MA-2]]). Cp. [[index::S|Sigma]]. Due to4 KB (620 words) - 14:26, 12 May 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (191 words) - 20:57, 8 November 2021
- ...perforated, but not end-to-end and vertically.<br>Along an [[index::VN-10|inscription]] in two lines.<br>Like all the bone findings on the [[index::Ganglegg]] hi1 KB (173 words) - 13:53, 18 September 2015
- ...zeno culture cp. {{bib|Zemmer-Plank 2002}}). Because of the [[index::SZ-87|inscription]], likewise a votive offering is conceivable. A reasonably similar example3 KB (504 words) - 10:58, 17 March 2020
- ...ever, an autopsy of the [[PU-8 potsherd|fragment]] resp. the [[index::PU-8|inscription]] was not effected. Moreover, as evinced in the case of the visit of the [[4 KB (539 words) - 13:19, 15 November 2016
- ...e statuette stands on a small round foot, along the edge an [[index::SZ-16|inscription]].<br>The bronze statuette was discovered by chance in 1846 (cp. {{bib|Ghis1 KB (184 words) - 15:18, 17 September 2015
- ...''metacarpus'') of a pig (''Sus scrofa'').<br>On one side an [[index::VR-4|inscription]].<br>For the find circumstances cp. Luciano Salzani, Lettura di una sezion1 KB (192 words) - 13:05, 15 March 2016
- {{inscription Syllabic punctuation is applied correctly. The inscription contains a Raetic name formula (individual name + patronym in {{m||-nu}}).3 KB (502 words) - 21:09, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (183 words) - 21:35, 8 November 2021
- Antler point; at the wider end perforated.<br>Along an [[index::SR-7|inscription]] from rigth to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group from [[index:1 KB (182 words) - 15:28, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (199 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
- ...the left leading flank as far as the centre of the body an [[index::SZ-71|inscription||this side]].<br>The kind of full plastic work with indication of details d1 KB (194 words) - 11:34, 12 November 2016
- {{inscription ...ers, length about 7.5 cm. They may be considered to belong together as one inscription – both have Sigma turned with the upper angle opened in writing direction5 KB (876 words) - 21:27, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (209 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- {{inscription ...ion being very similar, the lines may be considered to be part of the same inscription. The letters are well legible on the comparatively undisturbed surface. In3 KB (507 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- ...r side is polished, the bottom side holed.<br>On exterior an [[index::SR-4|inscription]] in two lines, from right to left.<br>Dal Rì dates the whole antler group1 KB (185 words) - 15:21, 11 September 2015
- {{inscription1 KB (223 words) - 21:16, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (196 words) - 20:52, 8 November 2021
- ...b|Vetter 1954}}: 66-67).<br>Further reference probably more related to the inscription: {{bib|Mayr 1951}}: 30 (No. VI), fig. VI; {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 311 (No.1 KB (197 words) - 12:36, 11 September 2015
- ...5 [No. 212]). In NRIE the [[NO-5 potsherd|object]] resp. the [[index::NO-5|inscription]] are listed with No. 110: "''frammento d'osso''" (cp. {{bib|NRIE}}: 44). I6 KB (834 words) - 16:13, 1 March 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (196 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (203 words) - 22:05, 8 November 2021
- The ablative I itself is attested in only one inscription, inflecting the enclitic pronoun ({{w||θeis}}) and possibly the ambiguous2 KB (220 words) - 23:09, 13 February 2017
- ...he [[index::BZ-15|characters]]. According to a notice of Whatmough that an inscription bearing object was found in [[index::Eppan / Appiano]] in 1931, this object1 KB (197 words) - 14:40, 28 September 2015
- ...es and dice eyes on the handle and in part on the rim.<br>An [[index::NO-2|inscription]] outside, below the flanged edge.<br>The object came in the property of th1 KB (210 words) - 14:38, 1 September 2016
- {{inscription1 KB (191 words) - 21:14, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (212 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- {{inscription1 KB (204 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- ...|bronze rod]] cannot be reliably determined. Because of the [[index::SZ-96|inscription]] and the appearance of the perforations as well as the remains of the nail4 KB (583 words) - 10:51, 17 March 2020
