Search results
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
- ...}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|L|L2}}<br><span style="margin-left:8px">{{c|U|U2}}</span>{{c|L|L2}} ...{c||Χ}}. The hasta of {{c||Χ}} is only slightly prolonged in the bottom; {{c||L2}} in line 2 features a doubled bar, cp. [[index::BZ-3]]. Line 3 contain3 KB (531 words) - 22:04, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|I}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|I}}1 KB (146 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- ...for Venetic, is preferred on the [[index::Sanzeno]] bronzes, while only {{c||Φ}} occurs in [[index::Magrè]], but the variants are not distributed com531 bytes (75 words) - 15:26, 17 May 2016
- |reading_original=(?)]{{c|A||d}}?{{c|L|L2}}(?)?{{c|A|A5}} ...ularly ramshackle letter or an unintentional scratch, is visible between {{c||A|d}} and the breaking edge. Pseudo-script cannot be excluded.3 KB (392 words) - 21:13, 8 November 2021
- ...{{c|E}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|V}}{{c|space}}{{c|I}}{{c|M}}{{c|E}}{{c|R}} ...om, not as tall as the letters, its shape does not correspond to that of {{c||Χ}} in {{w||visteχanu}}, and there are distinct gaps on either side. If3 KB (472 words) - 23:09, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|I|I}}{{c|U|U2}}611 bytes (76 words) - 23:33, 13 December 2021
- ...{c|A|A7}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|I}}(?)??{{c|A|A7}}{{c|U}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}[ ...ines are intended as hastae – possibly {{c||U3}}? Final {{c||A7}}{{c||Χ}}{{c||I}} is complete on fragment 4.3 KB (450 words) - 21:10, 8 November 2021
- ...|I}}{{c|Þ}}{{c|U}}{{c|I}}{{c|U}}{{c|M}}{{c|E|E2}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|E|E2}}{{c|R}} ..., an arrangement of lines {{c||line d 21}}{{c||line d 12}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}} (length 2.3 cm), as is the case in all the antler votives from3 KB (384 words) - 21:07, 8 November 2021
- ...E3}}{{c|H|H3}}{{c|space}}{{c|E|E4}}{{c|N}}{{c|M}}{{c|A|A4}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|P}} ...ellegrini 1918}}: 184, fig. 19 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photos tav. XXXIX b, c ={{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|LIR}} (drawings), {{bib|MLR}} (photo).2 KB (338 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- ...unct}}{{c|U}}{{c|H|H3|d}}{{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|V}}{{c|A||d}}[{{c|N}} ...a and the orientation of Heta. The punctuation mark inscribed into final {{c||R}} looks more pronounced than in [[index::SR-1]], but if it was not drill2 KB (326 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}1 KB (160 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
- ...c|A||d}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|Θ}} ...t vertical stroke {{c||punctuation7}} can be seen right above the bar of {{c||L2}}, but it is highly unlikely to be a separator – probably a slip of t3 KB (417 words) - 23:13, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original=(?)]?{{c|A}}[ ...the right of the hasta's top allows for a bar {{c||line d 20}}, yielding {{c||P2}}. The straight breaking edge on the left of the fragment may follow a1 KB (204 words) - 21:13, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|P||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|Θ||d}}?{{c|M||d}}{{c|N||d}}[ ...etter, but a hasta and the remains of three bars are distinguishable. Of {{c||N|d}}, the hasta on fragment 3 is very faint, but the upper part with the2 KB (330 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|symbol|symbol4}} ...{{c|symbol|symbol4}}), but including fractures to the left to represent {{c|Θ}}.1 KB (163 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|I}}{{c|P|P2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|symbol|symbol2}} ...ond hasta of the smaller chevron. The punctuation mark seen by him after {{c||I}} could not be verified. The inscription can be compared to {{w||upi}} o2 KB (260 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Ś|Ś3|d}}{{c|V||d}} ...well legible; the bars of {{c||V|d}} are slightly curved. The status of {{c||Ś3}} as a Raetic letter is dubious; in any case, the sequence is most pro1 KB (156 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Θ}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|U|U5}}{{c|Θ}}1 KB (148 words) - 21:59, 8 November 2021
- ...erse {{c||U|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||T|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||A3|d}}{{c||addU1}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}} ''itiaupi''. {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 46, based on Joppich's drawing,2 KB (255 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- ...{c|V||d}}{{c|A|A7|d}}{{c|Θ||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|N||d}}{{c|A|A5|d}}{{c|Χ||d}}{{c|E|E2|d}} ...{c|L||d}}{{c|A|A7|d}}{{c|Θ||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|N||d}}{{c|A|A5|d}}{{c|Χ||d}}{{c|E|E2|d}}4 KB (611 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|E}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|L|L2}} ...final letter is damaged by corrosion – {{c||V}} cannot be excluded, but {{c||E}} is much more probable phonetically. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}'s reading {{w|2 KB (318 words) - 23:00, 13 December 2021
- ...tuation|punctuation7}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|H|H3}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|Θ}} ...for the mixing of the two alphabet variants. {{c||I}}{{c||E}} instead of {{c||H3}}, as suggested by Schumacher, can be excluded.3 KB (507 words) - 21:06, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}640 bytes (79 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|Χ}}?[ ...looked at from the outside. Of the character to its right, only an angle {{c||U3}} is left. While it cannot be excluded that the inscription is incomple926 bytes (124 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|E||d}}[??? ...all. The visible tips are too crowded to suggest actual letters; despite {{c||E|d}}, we are probably concerned with non-script. (See [[index::Non-script2 KB (286 words) - 22:16, 8 November 2021
- ...c|I}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|I}}{{c|P|P2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|M}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}} ...bars of {{c||A5}} in all cases do not touch the hasta. Of second-to-last {{c||A5}}, the right hasta is separated in two parts slightly offset from each3 KB (522 words) - 21:55, 8 November 2021
- ...K}}{{c|U}}{{c|L}}{{c|E}}{{c|A}}{{c|T}}{{c|I}}{{c|S}}{{c|E}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|I}}{{c|N}}[ ...ough in some letters the hasta was added after the bars ({{c||Χ}}, first {{c||E}}), possibly an attempt at extra neatness.3 KB (573 words) - 22:17, 8 November 2021
- ...ginal={{c||addE1}}{{c|I}}{{c||addR3}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addO3}} ...ie<br>{{c||addE1}}{{c||I}}{{c||addR2}}{{c||U2}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addO3}}4 KB (686 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Ś|Ś3|d}}{{c|V|V|d}} ...vertical break damages the tips of the bars of {{c||V|d}}. The status of {{c||Ś3}} as a Raetic letter is dubious; in any case, the sequence is most pro1 KB (209 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|K}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|Θ|Θ2}}[ ...[index::IT-8]], the latter also from the Pillerhöhe); the shape of alpha {{c|A|A7}} also occurs with frequency in the north.1 KB (164 words) - 16:04, 14 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A14|d}}? ...rther traces can be seen at about 15 cm above the area referred to (tall {{c||A3|d}}?) and possibly also above the curved crack – it is not possible t1 KB (178 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
- ...}{{c|K|K2}}{{c|I}}{{c|T|T4}}{{c|U}}{{c|I}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|N}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|T|T4}} ...the orientation of Alpha and Sigma is not. The most notable character is {{c||T4}}, which appears thrice, always in the form of a hasta with a perfectly4 KB (557 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A13}}{{c|N}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|E}}{{c|T|T4}} ...]]), and does not belong with the inscription. Though it interferes with {{c||S}} crammed in on its right, the reading of all but the first letter is un3 KB (440 words) - 21:16, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A6}}{{c|Χ}}[ ...upper line might conceivably be read ]{{p||i}}{{p||i}}{{p||a}}, but {{c||A9}} would be atypical, and the single vertical scratches are too far apar1 KB (206 words) - 22:06, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c||K}}{{c||I}}{{c||K|d}}988 bytes (128 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|Θ}}{{c||line d 0001}}{{c|I}}{{c||line d 0002}}{{c|P}} ...ter, damaged by the break, only the tips of two oblique lines are left – {{c||Θ}} suggests itself.2 KB (285 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- ...A|A7}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}} ...e, or the crampedness is due to the lack of space. {{c||U}} is smallish; {{c||A7}} is crammed into the top left corner.4 KB (661 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- ...ed to word separators). {{c||Mpunct}} being attested in combination with {{c||Rpunct}}, it is filed as a ligature in TIR, but note that the punct is ess610 bytes (89 words) - 14:30, 16 February 2016
- [[File:Marker_C_Gold.png]] {{c||P}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ps||Pd]][[sortda [[File:Marker_C_YellowGreen.png]] {{c||P2}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::P2s||P2d]][[sor3 KB (434 words) - 00:59, 27 January 2016
- ...|V3}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|S}}{{c|I}}{{c|V|V3}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|L|L2}} ...ject or inscription is missing. The fact that the upper tip of the first {{c|A|A7}} is in evidence suggests that the object had much the same shape as t5 KB (789 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
- ...the left hasta repeated; to the left two oblique strokes {{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}}. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for possible951 bytes (128 words) - 23:13, 13 December 2021
- ...|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|V}}{{c|space}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|N}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|E}}{{c|Φ|Φ2}} |sigla_pid=215 (c)3 KB (453 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|A||d}}[ ...hat appears to be the outside of the vessel, the remains (upper part) of {{c||A|d}}. Dubious scratches on either side of it (see drawing).658 bytes (85 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A||d}}{{c|L|L2}}653 bytes (81 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|E}}{{c|K}}689 bytes (81 words) - 22:05, 8 November 2021
- [[File:Marker_C_Gold.png]] {{c||U}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Us||Ud]][[sortda [[File:Marker_C_YellowGreen.png]] {{c||U2}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::U2s||U2d]][[sor3 KB (470 words) - 01:16, 27 January 2016
- ...be arranged into a variety of crude characters – possibly even {{c||A|d}}{{c||L}} {{w||la}}.696 bytes (91 words) - 21:49, 8 November 2021
- ...|N}}{{c||A5}}{{c||Χ}}{{c||I}}{{c||Ś}}{{c||A5}}{{c||K}}{{c|space}}{{c||I}}{{c||Χ}} ...}. The crossing of the lower bar of {{c||K}} with the hasta of the third {{c||A5}} in line 1 shows clearly that line 2 was inscribed after line 1.4 KB (640 words) - 17:36, 6 November 2021
- ...9A Ś]), occurs only once in the epigraphically peculiar [[index::PU-1]]. {{c||Ś3}} is never securely attested as a letter, but only as part of a factor1 KB (160 words) - 02:52, 22 May 2016
- ...}{{c|E||d}}{{c|R||d}}{{c|P||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|N||d}}{{c|A|A8|d}}{{c|K||d}}{{c|E||d}}2 KB (372 words) - 21:08, 8 November 2021
- ....2]], [[index::SZ-46.2]] and [[index::WE-6]]. A corresponding variant of {{c||A3|d}} occurs in some of the Magrè inscriptions ([[index::MA-8]], [[index ...ly, the associated [[index::NO-13]]), while variants with a falling bar ({{c||A14}}) are almost exclusive to the petrographs (cp. the frequency of round4 KB (620 words) - 14:26, 12 May 2016
- |reading_original={{c|I}}{{c|U|U2}}691 bytes (84 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c||Ś|d}}{{c|V||d}} ...wall of the beaker, length about 4 cm. The characters are well legible; {{c||Ś|d}}, with oblique hastae, is damaged by a break. The sequence is most p954 bytes (126 words) - 17:29, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original=?{{c|A|A5}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|E}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|N}}{{c|E}} ...n [[index::SZ-1.2]]; {{bib|IR|Mancini}} suggested an alternative reading {{c||K}}. After a gap of about 0.5 cm, a St. Andrew's cross overlaid by five sh2 KB (297 words) - 23:15, 13 December 2021
- [[File:Marker_C_Gold.png]] {{c||L}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ls||Ld]][[sortda [[File:Marker_C_YellowGreen.png]] {{c||L2}} ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::L2s||L2d]][[sor3 KB (358 words) - 01:03, 27 January 2016
- ...ginal={{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|N}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|Ś|Ś3}}{{c|Θ}}[ ...{{c||A3|d}}{{c||N}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||R}}{{c||E}}{{c|T|T4}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|U}}[4 KB (649 words) - 21:29, 8 November 2021
- ...}{{c|I||d}}{{c|L||d}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7|d}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|K||d}}{{c|E||d}} ...d}}{{c||I|d}}{{c||L|d}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||K|d}}{{c||E|d}}5 KB (876 words) - 21:27, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=?{{c|U|U5|d}}??(?){{c|E||d}}(?) ...ue traces of one, maybe two characters may be guessed at. Well preserved {{c||E|d}} is followed by either a frame line or the hasta of another character2 KB (292 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- ...c|A|A3}}[{{c|Θ||d}}{{c|U||d}}{{c|R||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|E||d}}{{c|Þ||d}}{{c|U||d}} ...|Pellegrini 1918}}: 185, fig. 20 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XXXVIII c ={{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo).4 KB (692 words) - 22:34, 8 November 2021
- ...ates with {{c||L2}}, hence the reading as {{p||l}} despite the fact that {{c||P2}} in Sanzeno context is normally Pi. ...erably uniform shape, with {{c||L}} ({{p||l}} or {{p||p}}) and Sanzenoid {{c||A|d}} (sometimes with the hasta in writing direction shortened). They are3 KB (447 words) - 13:41, 12 May 2016
- |reading_original={{c|R|R2}}{{c|Θ}}681 bytes (94 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- ...r>{{c|A||d}}{{c|N}}{{c|Ś}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|R}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|K}} ...r (tips of {{c||R}}, secure {{c||N}}) on the other hand. Final {{c||A|d}}{{c||N}} is unambiguous. After the last letter, two broad indentations on top a5 KB (784 words) - 21:37, 8 November 2021
- ..._original={{c|U}}{{c|Ś}}[ ]{{c|E|E3}}{{c|K}}{{c|U}}{{c|L}}{{c|I}}{{c|E|E3}}[ ...''nuśu''- on [[index::MA-14]]. While this parallel is hardly compelling, {{c||U}} is likely.3 KB (431 words) - 22:34, 8 November 2021
- ...eory that Runic {{c||addD3}} /þ/ might be derived from the Magrè-variant {{c||Þ}} is not particularly likely and did not suggest the choice.) ...have a graphic parallel only in Camunic alphabetaria, where a character {{c||Þ2}} occupies the position of San (see [[index::Script]]), but this may b4 KB (657 words) - 15:02, 24 November 2016
- ...||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|N|N2|d}}{{c|U|U2|d}}{{c|A|A8|d}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|U|U2|d}}{{c|A|A8|d}} ...amaged by surface abrasion, but the reading is unambiguous. Letter no. 9 {{c||Lpunct2|d}} is surrounded by additional shortish scratches, which are most3 KB (502 words) - 21:09, 8 November 2021
- ...{c|Z|Z2}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation8}}{{c|V}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|L}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|M}} ...which can then be read {{c||Z2}} Zeta. In this case, the letters {{c||N}}{{c||Z2}} {{w||zn}} are likely to represent the verbal form {{w||þinaχe}}. Cp3 KB (397 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Ś|Ś3|d}}{{c|V||d}} ...ttom; length about 3 cm. Both characters are well legible. The status of {{c||Ś3}} as a Raetic letter is dubious; in any case, the sequence is most pro1 KB (147 words) - 17:28, 13 December 2021
- ...tion3}}{{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|LT}}{{c|E}}{{c|Φ|Φ3}} ...object around to be able to steady his hand on the object. Final {{c||E}}{{c||L2}} is not inverted.5 KB (801 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
- ...|A|A14}}{{c|K|K4}}{{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}{{c|N}}{{c|M}}{{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}} ...avily damaged and spoilt by more recent scratchings, but the presence of {{c|E}} may be inferred from comparison with the preceding inscriptions.3 KB (464 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- ...{c|R}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|Φ}}{{c|S||d}}<br>{{c|U}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|E}}?{{c|E}}[ ...;ẹ?eθinạ}}<br>{{c|A|A3}}{{c||N}}{{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||E}}?{{c||E}}[4 KB (750 words) - 21:28, 8 November 2021
- ...c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|symbol|symbol2}}{{c|E}}{{c|L}}{{c|I}}{{c|Z||d}}{{c|A|A3}} ...}{{c|V|V3}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|E}}{{c|L}}{{c|I}}{{c|Z||d}}{{c|A|A3}}4 KB (641 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A||d}}{{c|L}}733 bytes (93 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
- |author=Peter C. Planta294 bytes (37 words) - 01:03, 25 November 2013
- |reading_original={{c|P|P2}}{{c|I}}765 bytes (103 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c||T2|d}}{{c||A15}}{{c||T2|d}} On the other side, a symbol "a caporale" {{c||symbol4}}.1 KB (192 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
- ...the equation is highly doubtful. As for the rest of the Raetic North, a {{c||Z}}-like shape only occurs in the dubious [[index::IT-3]]. ...inscriptions, similar in form and content, demonstrates the use of Zeta {{c||Z2}} for the dental affricate in the anlaut of the word {{w||þinaχe}}, w2 KB (387 words) - 15:28, 12 April 2016
- |reading_original=]{{c|T|T3}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|I|I}}[ ...cratch is slightly aslant. Despite the comparatively large lacuna before {{c||I}}, the presence of more letters in the beginning cannot be excluded. Cp.2 KB (292 words) - 18:16, 6 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|K|K2|d}}{{c|U||d}}{{c|S|S2|d}}{{c|E||d}}{{c|N||d}} ...running down the rock wall; it cannot be excluded that the notch before {{c||K2|d}} is a natural crack. No traces of characters can be detected beyond3 KB (441 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...pace}}{{c|U|U4}}{{c|N}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|P|P2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|L|L2}} ...They are separated by a pronounced distance (0.7 cm); a punctuation mark {{c||punctuation7}} is used to separate the patronymic suffix {{m||-nu}} from t3 KB (460 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|K}}773 bytes (101 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A||d}}{{c|L}}762 bytes (97 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
- ...#91;{{c||space}}{{c||space}}{{c||space}}]{{c|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|P|P4}} ...rdly be anything but {{c||I}}, and finally only slightly damaged {{c||E}}{{c||L}}. A very tentative reading including all the doubtful surmises could be5 KB (846 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- ...{c|S}}{{c|E}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|I}}{{c|N}}{{c|Ś}}{{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|V|V3}}{{c|E|E3}}{{c|T|T3}} ...rst hasta of {{c||A3|d}} in {{w||aχvil}} and has a crack along the final {{c||I}}, but both letters are legible unambiguously. Two lines enclose the ins5 KB (856 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
- ...|K|K4}}{{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}{{c|N}}{{c|U|U5}}{{c|A|A14}}{{c|T}}{{c|I}}{{c|P|P3}} ...|K4}}{{c||I}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||E}}{{c|I}}{{c||U5}}{{c||A14}}{{c||T}}{{c||I}}{{c||R}}5 KB (875 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- |author=Raffaele C. de Marinis261 bytes (30 words) - 17:51, 7 April 2020
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|K}}772 bytes (101 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
- Images in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LIV c and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}) = {{bib|MLR}}. ...n length. While some of the lines form basic characters like {{c||Θ}} or {{c||I}}, many mesh and are part of zig-zag patterns. Possibly pseudo-script. S1 KB (166 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
- ...of the last two letters. The '''right''' one might then be {{c||Þ3}} or {{c||Φ2}}, but note that Phi occurs in [[index::VN-14.1]] in a rounded and ver879 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|Þ|Þ3}} ...etters, the two oblique strokes visible next to the breaking edge may be {{c||A|d}}. Compare [[index::SZ-32]].801 bytes (97 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|E}}{{c|M}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|I}}{{c|P|P2}} ...increasing inclination of the hastae, almost parallel to that of initial {{c||P2|d}}, suggests that the writer did not bother to move either the handle2 KB (339 words) - 20:52, 8 November 2021
- ...unctuation3|d}}{{c|E||d}}{{c|L|L2|d}}{{c|U|U2|d}}{{c|K|K2|d}}{{c|U|U2|d}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation3|d}} ...on of the special character and [[index::Þ]] for details. {{c||E|d}} and {{c||L2|d}} of {{w||eluku}} are damaged by the break between the two fragments,6 KB (1,054 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A4|d}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A3|d}}[ ...re very well legible on a practically undamaged surface. {{c||A3|d}} and {{c||Θ}} are clear. The third letter, damaged by the break, can hardly be anyt2 KB (271 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
- ...={{c|I}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|E}}{{c|Ś}}{{c|E}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|V}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|L|L2}} ...ol (?), a short, slightly oblique stroke, can be seen right behind final {{c||I}}, but does not cast doubt on the reading. The first part of the sequenc3 KB (402 words) - 22:57, 13 December 2021
- ...}{{c||line d 2000}}{{c||line v 0111}}</span>{{c|E}}{{c|Þ|Þ3}}{{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|L|L2}}</p> ...oto), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing), {{bib|Marchesini 2014b}}: 202 and Taf. 2a and c (photos), {{bib|MLR}} (photo).4 KB (606 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|K|K2}}857 bytes (119 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]?{{c|Χ}}{{c|A||d}} Although the lower parts of the letters are missing, {{c||Χ}} and {{c||A}} (curiously small (or offset?) in comparison) can be indentified. The s2 KB (358 words) - 20:59, 8 November 2021
- ...ng_original=]{{c|N}}[<span style="margin-left:10px">]</span>?{{c|E}}?[974 bytes (122 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A||d}}{{c|L}}886 bytes (120 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
- ...><span style="margin-left:24px">{{c|A||d}}</span>{{c|R}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|S}} ...f them appear to contain words, others only single characters or rows of {{c||I}}. It is unlikely that the incompletely inscribed sectors contained more9 KB (1,481 words) - 21:24, 8 November 2021
- |author=Raffaele C. De Marinis, Simonetta Biaggio Simona287 bytes (39 words) - 18:01, 7 April 2020
- |author=Rolf C. A. Rottländer297 bytes (38 words) - 15:49, 10 December 2013
- ...|d}}, {{c||N|d}} and maybe {{c||U3|d}} qualify as letters. The status of {{c||Ś3|d}} as a Raetic letter is dubious, but the form does repeatedly occur2 KB (250 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A15}}{{c|L|L2}}896 bytes (114 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Ś||d}}{{c|V||d}}917 bytes (128 words) - 17:27, 13 December 2021
- ...index::UG-2.1]] can be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of p952 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- ...aratactic conjunction in Raetic, to compare with Etruscan ''-ka'' (> {{w||-c}}). Note that there is no connection with Latin {{w||-que}}.273 bytes (35 words) - 17:07, 16 July 2015
- ...|V}}{{c|U|U3}}{{c|K}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|I}}{{c|P|P6}}{{c|S}}{{c|space}}{{c|E}}{{c|N}}(?)???[ ...grè-type two-bar pi which we would expect in North Tyrol, viz. {{c||P3}}/{{c||P4}} (see [[index::P]]. Upsilon appears with one straight hasta and the se3 KB (553 words) - 22:29, 23 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}[1 KB (194 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|A|A13}}{{c|N}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|E}}{{c|T|T4}} ...for what looks like one or even two indentations right below the bar of {{c||A13}}. See also {{bib|Nedoma 1995}}: 33.3 KB (488 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- ...ing_original={{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|N}}{{c|U|U3}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|T|T4}} ...}}: 310 f. used the apparent combination of Tau and the Raetic character {{c||T4}} as one of his arguments for the identification of the latter with the4 KB (543 words) - 22:11, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|R|R2}}{{c|Θ}}954 bytes (122 words) - 21:17, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|K||d}}{{c|L|L2|d}}921 bytes (112 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
- |author=Raffaele C. De Marinis314 bytes (44 words) - 18:05, 7 April 2020
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c|A|A5}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|E}}{{c|V}} ...ng outward. Applied very neatly with thin strokes (<1 mm); only in final {{c||U2}} are they a bit askew. CE-1.2 and [[index::CE-1.3]] resemble each othe3 KB (382 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- |source=IR: 281 [No. 62], pl. XLIX, fig. c; Nothdurfter 2002: 1150 [list 3, No. 8] ...the incisions refer to SZ-63 rechts and Schumacher reads {{c||E}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}).<br>On the narrow end [[index::SZ-63.2|a single character]].<br>Furth3 KB (476 words) - 12:38, 2 March 2016
- |title=La Romagna tra VI e IV secolo a. C. nel quadro della protostoria dell'Italia centrale342 bytes (43 words) - 02:57, 29 November 2013
- ...however related to "MLR 236" is given {{c|U|U2}}{{c|I|I}} resp. {{c|I|I}}{{c|U|U2}}.<br>Autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum'' in Novem3 KB (425 words) - 16:28, 30 October 2015
- ...|I||d}}{{c|S|S2|d}}{{c|A|A3|d}}{{c|E||d}}{{c|punctuation||d}}{{c|K|K3|d}}{{c|I||d}} ...cally upwards about halfway between [[index::ST-5]] and [[index::ST-1]]. {{c||R2|d}} is disrupted by more recent M-shaped scratches (maybe initials); th3 KB (456 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- ...dT1}}{{c||addA5}}{{c||addR3d}}{{c||I|d}}{{c||punctuation|d}}{{c||addS1d}}{{c||addA5}}?[ ...raded; Morandi very tentatively suggests a sequence {{c||U2|d}}{{c||I|d}}{{c||addS1d}} ''vis'' before the well legible (rest of) line 3. Line 4, despite6 KB (958 words) - 20:29, 23 November 2021
- ...c|I}}{{c|S}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|E}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|Ś}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|V}}{{c|A||d}} ...t {{c||U}}, yet Upsilon is Sanzeno {{c||U2}} (fitting with {{c||L2}} and {{c||P2}}) in all five other instances on the plaque.<br>7 KB (1,194 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2021
- |author=Raffaele C. de Marinis, Marta Rapi360 bytes (46 words) - 14:43, 2 May 2023
- ...d}}{{c|A|A7}}<br>{{c|Θ||d}}{{c|A|A4|d}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|A|A4|d}}{{c|N|N2|d}}{{c|I||d}}[ ...y damaged and well legible. No traces of characters after it. The Sigma ({{c||S|d}}) seen by Sebesta at the beginning of the line (at the end of the obj6 KB (1,039 words) - 20:59, 8 November 2021
- ...}{{c|E||d}}{{c|Φ|Φ4|d}}{{c|A|A14|d}}{{c|K|K3|d}}{{c|A|A14|d}}{{c|L|L4|d}}{{c|E||d}} ...of {{c||U5|d}} (see also {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 37 f.). The reading of {{c||L4|d}} as {{p||l}} is based on the identification of the sequence as the c6 KB (1,009 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|K||d}}{{c|E||d}}1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=[???{{c|N}}] ...mage and often doubtful white inlay. The rightmost character can be read {{c||N}}, the lines following it (as traced with the paint) cannot be arranged1 KB (164 words) - 20:58, 8 November 2021
- ...L|L3}}{{c|U|U5}}{{c|T|T2}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|S|S2}}{{c|E}}{{c|H|H4}} ...ctuation7}}{{c||NU}}{{c||A14}}{{c||L3}}{{c||U5}}{{c||T2}}{{c|I}}{{c||S2}}{{c||E}}7 KB (1,056 words) - 21:32, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=?]{{c|E||d}} ...is the best preserved inscription on the rock wall. A fairly unambiguous {{c||E|d}} can be seen right between the upper ends of the frame lines, possibl1 KB (172 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- ...}{{c|T|T4|d}}{{c|L||d}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|N||d}}{{c|I||d}}{{c|L||d}}{{c|E||d}} ...secondary stroke is situated between the latter and {{c||L|d}}. Finally, {{c||E|d}} with a secondary stroke overlaying the lowest bar.8 KB (1,299 words) - 21:37, 29 August 2022
- |reading_original=]?{{c|A|A3|d}}?[ ...he top at about 25 cm from the bottom on the left side of the rock wall. {{c||A3|d}} is the only securely legible letter. The one before it, consisting1 KB (174 words) - 22:00, 8 November 2021
- ...dentified, though the two characters in the middle might well be {{c||E}}{{c||V}}. The remains of both lateral characters consist in angles, but with op1 KB (175 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
- ...|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}}{{c|I}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|T}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|A|A12}}{{c|K}} ...N}}s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final {{c||T}} seen by {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} (p. 388) cannot be confirmed (see {6 KB (889 words) - 21:31, 8 November 2021
- ...}}{{c|T||d}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|K}}{{c|N}}{{c|E}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|K}} ...nscription are irregular (final {{c||E}} is about the same distance from {{c||Χ}}). {{w||nkus}} is not a likely word either. An isolated sequence {{w||5 KB (756 words) - 22:58, 13 December 2021
- ...}{{c|I}}{{c|R}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c|K}}{{c|A|A3}}{{c|N}} ...kes or scratches are situated between the two letters and inscribed into {{c||Θ}}, respectively, judged to be slips of the tool by {{bib|Ghirardini 1907 KB (1,189 words) - 22:30, 23 November 2021
- ...di Bolzano tra la tarda età del bronzo e la romanizzazione (XIII–I sec. a. C.)490 bytes (68 words) - 16:34, 25 January 2014
- |reading_original=?{{c|V|V3}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|E}}??{{c|R|R2}}{{c|A|A5}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation4}} ...rkey 2001}}: 112 f.; scratched twice like some of the hastae before it), {{c||U}} ({{bib|Egg 1986}}: 227, no. 324); very unlikely in the context of the6 KB (916 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c||N}}{{c|T|T3}} ...ng), {{bib|Oberziner 1883b}}: Tav. XX, 3 (drawing), {{bib|IR}}: Tav. XXXVI c (photo), {{bib|LIR}} (drawing), {{bib|Marchesini 2014b}}: 202 and Taf. 2b (3 KB (416 words) - 17:32, 13 December 2021
- .../span>{{c|L||d}}{{c|U|U5|d}}?{{c|Θ||d}}{{c|U|U5|d}}{{c|R||d}}{{c|U|U5|d}}{{c|S|S2|d}} ...he distance between {{c||S2}} and {{c||K|d}} is not bigger than average. {{c||K|d}} is damaged by a vertical crack, but unambiguous, as are the followin9 KB (1,493 words) - 21:20, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|T|T3}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|R}}{{c|E}}{{c|K|K2|d}} |reading_variant={{w|karut}}<br>{{c||T3}}{{c||U2}}{{c||R}}{{c|A}}{{c||K2|d}}5 KB (805 words) - 21:26, 8 November 2021
- ...x::Magrè]]). Forms with the upper bar not touching the tip of the hasta ({{c||E3}}) are also most often found at that site; they tend to be associated w550 bytes (82 words) - 18:15, 11 April 2016
- ...pan style="margin-left:8px">]</span>?{{c|A|A3}}{{c|R|R2|d}}{{c|M||d}}{{c|A|A3}}[ ...etters represent the ending of line 1, belonging with {{c||A3}}{{c||Θ|d}}{{c||A3}}. That the writer did not simply complete the word in the next line mi10 KB (1,627 words) - 20:28, 23 November 2021
- ...{{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c||addΧ2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c||addP3}}{{c||addI1}}{{c|Θ}} *St. Andrew's cross {{c||Θ}} as in a handful of rock inscriptions, mainly from Crap di Luine; the11 KB (1,890 words) - 20:49, 8 November 2021
- ...2}}, two on the narrow end below resp. before the inscription, one below {{c||E}}. Cp. marks in the same shape on [[index::SR-3 antler]] and [[index::SR1 KB (208 words) - 15:31, 11 September 2015
- |source=IR: 284–285, pl. LI, fig. c567 bytes (69 words) - 15:37, 17 September 2015
- ...on section between blade and handle, two characters: {{c|symbol|symbol3}}{{c|symbol|symbol4}}.<br>The decoration indicates a date to the turn from type1 KB (212 words) - 10:14, 3 November 2015
- ...]] in two lines. The object also bears two chevron-shaped marks {{c||U2}}{{c||U2}} on the broad end below and before the inscription. Cp. marks in the s1 KB (206 words) - 15:19, 11 September 2015
- ...ing in Etruscan, Venetic and Lepontic script. In Raetic script, {{c||T}}/{{c||T2}} was demonstrably used in [[index::Magrè]], [[index::San Giorgio di V ...a similarity between the two inscriptions. Alphabet tables which display {{c||T3}} as Pi are found in {{bib|AIF I}}: 55 and {{bib|Pellegrini 1959}}; the12 KB (1,867 words) - 17:05, 24 November 2016
- |publisher=Librairie Académique - Didier et C<sup>ie</sup>642 bytes (92 words) - 19:41, 1 February 2016
- ...right to left. The object also bears two chevron-shaped marks {{c||U2}} {{c||U2}} near the broad end below the inscription. Cp. marks in the same shape2 KB (209 words) - 15:26, 11 September 2015
- ...index::AS-2]], arguing that both should probably be read as inverted San {{c||Ś4}}(''ś'').645 bytes (81 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
- ...stokes not arrangeable into characters. Possibly intended as the symbol {{c||symbol5}}.669 bytes (85 words) - 21:54, 8 November 2021
- Raetic Mu appears consistently with three rather than four bars ({{c||addM1}}, as prevalent in Etruscan, Venetic and Lepontic). This characteris638 bytes (94 words) - 02:43, 22 May 2016
- |source=IR: 278–279 (No. 55), pl. XLVI, fig. c ...er is alternating between 9 and 11. Between the ''striae''-decorations a {{c||Θ}}-shaped character which is part of the ornamentation. Decorations befo2 KB (239 words) - 17:27, 27 October 2015
- ...}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|K}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|R}}{{c|I}}{{c|S}} ...ther difference is the execution of rho, written {{c||R}} in SL-2.1, but {{c||R2}} in [[index::SL-2.2]]. Marstrander's splitting of the sequence into tw8 KB (1,209 words) - 21:25, 8 November 2021
- ...ents:<br>Fragment A: 9 x 20.7 cm<br>Fragment B: 19.8 x 24.6 cm<br>Fragment C: 10.2 x 12 cm<br>Fragment D: 12 x 12 cm<br>Fragment E: 15.9 x 17.1 cm<br>Fr ...aeticarum'' in November 2013.<br>''S.K.'' with additional information by ''C.S.''4 KB (654 words) - 15:34, 1 October 2015
- |reading_original={{c|U|U2}}693 bytes (87 words) - 21:53, 8 November 2021
- ...as part of a potentially para-script element. The typically Venetic form {{c||H4}} is attested only once (somewhat doubtfully) in a petrograph.678 bytes (99 words) - 13:29, 4 April 2016
- Pellegrini writes: "in un altro pezzo di fondo trovarsi la lettera {{c||Θ}} seguita a s[inistra] dai resti di un ''u'' o di un ''a'', fosse quind702 bytes (93 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
- Nalli's drawing shows a {{c||Φ4}}-shape crossed by an oblique line. {{bib|PID|Whatmough}} reads ''θ''682 bytes (87 words) - 20:45, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original={{c|Χ|Χ3}}773 bytes (89 words) - 21:40, 8 November 2021
- ...le 5, to the right of [[index::AK-1.17]]. Only faint traces are visible ({{c||A|d}}, height about 9.5 cm, in the area under the potential ligature of [[722 bytes (92 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
- ...bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 313 (no. 17) (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIV,c (above) and drawing) = {{bib|LIR}}).764 bytes (91 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
- ...}}{{c||I}} (fig. 7.8), {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}} (fig. 7.9 left), {{c|symbol|symbol2}} and oblique (fig. 7.9 middle). Lora e Ruta Serafini connec5 KB (833 words) - 17:26, 10 March 2016
- ...ggestive traces are found at about 34 cm above the well visible asterisk {{c||symbol2}} (about 50 cm from the ground, height 9.2 cm), but no reading can756 bytes (99 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
- |reading_original=]{{c|Θ|Θ}}[798 bytes (93 words) - 20:56, 8 November 2021
- ...n the identification of St. Andrew's cross with Theta. The small variant {{c||Θ2}} is reminiscent of the Etruscan/Venetic protoform attested on Venetic760 bytes (104 words) - 14:45, 11 April 2016
- |reading_original={{c|symbol|symbol4}}801 bytes (109 words) - 22:59, 13 December 2021
- |find_context=settlement, section C ...1952}}: 176–177). The object was discovered with other findings in section C of the settlement. The map and the here used number 16 indicates the exact2 KB (324 words) - 14:57, 11 September 2015
- {{#vardefine: values | A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z }}<div class="navigation-line1 KB (131 words) - 16:03, 15 June 2019
- ...es are left. At about 40 cm from the bottom, a hasta and angle, possibly {{c||N|d}}, are visible.948 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
- ...([[index::SR-1]], [[index::SR-8]]). A variant with a small vertical bar {{c||addI1}} is used in the epigraphically Camunic [[index::AV-1]]. Any such ad1 KB (165 words) - 14:52, 11 April 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D ...etic settlement [[index::Himmelreich]]. Franz confirms a dating to La Tène C and La Téne D concerning the findings discovered by Kasseroler (cp. {{bib|3 KB (384 words) - 09:57, 28 September 2015
- ...aeticarum'' in November 2013.<br>''S.K.'' with additional information by ''C.S.''5 KB (787 words) - 11:46, 16 April 2020
- |reading_original={{c|symbol}}1 KB (140 words) - 23:12, 13 December 2021
- ...made up of about five short scratches, followed by a zig-zag, suggesting {{c||M}}. There is another "bar" extending from the bottom of the longer line i1 KB (149 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
- |reading_original={{c|symbol}}1 KB (141 words) - 23:10, 13 December 2021
- ...ur inneralpinen Bronze- und Eisenzeit'', Basel 1983 (= Antiqua 9); Andreas C. Zürcher, ''Urgeschichtliche Fundstellen Graubündens'', Chur 1982 (= Schr ...remains of three characters ( {{c||I}} {{c||I}} and probably remains of {{c||Θ}}). In accord with the typology and the decoration the bowl dates to La5 KB (809 words) - 18:14, 10 March 2016
- ...951}}: 133 with transcription (Mayr labels the bronze as ''Doppelpferdchen C''); {{bib|Vetter 1954}}: 71.1 KB (141 words) - 15:15, 17 September 2015
- ! style="text-align:center; width:16px;" | {{c||S2|d}} ! style="text-align:center; width:16px;" | {{c||L4|d}}13 KB (1,900 words) - 00:13, 25 April 2020
- ...tool ({{bib|Marstrander 1927}}: 14 f., 20). Another mark {{c||line d 2}} {{c||line d 1}} (height 0.6 cm) is embossed on the edge of the dome right above4 KB (616 words) - 00:27, 17 April 2020
- |reading_original={{c||Χ3}}1 KB (142 words) - 23:14, 13 December 2021
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D ...12|characters]] from right to left composed by the two characters {{c|E}}{{c|K}}. To be compared with the [[index::VN-18|characters]] of [[index::VN-185 KB (776 words) - 12:44, 14 March 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D ...ne bears the inscription: ''χaris'' {{c|Þ|Þ3}}''u'' where the character {{c|Þ|Þ3}} seems to be incomplete. This bone was not traceable in the [[index5 KB (771 words) - 07:45, 23 May 2016
- ...6 cm in depth. The letters are roughly aligned on the edge; after final {{c||E2}}, a space suggests the end of the inscription. At this end, the slab i ...3d}}{{c||punctuation}}{{c||R}}{{c||E}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||A2}}{{c||I}}{{c||K2}}<br>15 KB (2,445 words) - 23:43, 18 March 2020
- ...dex::θr|characters]] θṛ[ (in original script: ]{{c|R|R2}}{{c|Θ}}) present a factory mark.<br>Further information about the find circums4 KB (566 words) - 11:08, 23 March 2016
- ...presenza di ceramica grigia (...) a partire da fine IV - pieno III sec. a. C."'').<br>The entire material discovered in the Raetic settlement of [[index9 KB (1,293 words) - 16:06, 25 January 2016
- ...to the Fritzens-Sanzeno culture. The dating 5<sup>th</sup>–3<sup>rd</sup> c. follows {{bib|Constantini 2002}}: 48.1 KB (206 words) - 23:16, 7 April 2020
- ...ertain. In any case, the last four characters {{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c|A|A5}} (-''aris'') are well legible.<br>The [[index::VN-16 bone point|fragm7 KB (1,138 words) - 07:28, 23 May 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D ...etic settlement [[index::Himmelreich]]. Franz confirms a dating to La Tène C and La Téne D concerning the findings discovered by Kasseroler (cp. {{bib|4 KB (551 words) - 12:46, 23 March 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D |source=IR: 287 [No. 76], pl. LII, fig. c5 KB (696 words) - 09:24, 29 September 2015
- ...3;ịṣẹ'', while Vetter saw ''kuse'' (with upsilon {{c||addU1}}) on the cast made by Kurz. {{bib|Joppich 1971}}: 43 and {{bib|Pros2 KB (232 words) - 21:33, 8 November 2021
- ...final part indicates the verb {{w||þinaχe}}; on the back side the symbol {{c||symbol5}}.<br>In the recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions2 KB (230 words) - 11:26, 29 January 2016
- ...r the potential interpretation of the [[index::VR-2|characters]] {{c||N}}{{c||Z2}} as reduced verbal form of {{w||þinaχe}} as well as the partly inter4 KB (664 words) - 23:06, 4 March 2016
- ...ons. The material is published in {{bib|Beschi 2000}}: 73–94.). Eichner (p.c.) analyses the latter form as ''nu-v-aiz-na'' 'sacro-sanctum' (with the gli ...ion. The common reading is ''têrśna'' with tau {{c||T}} rather than zeta {{c||Z}}, but the character is damaged in the lower area, so that zeta cannot b4 KB (656 words) - 15:11, 16 April 2020
- ...o''; Pellegrini indicates the name given by Roberti as well as ''Pferdchen C'' (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1951}}: 312). The latter in according to Mayr (cp.2 KB (271 words) - 15:12, 17 September 2015
- ...the centre, reminiscent of phi (or, hypothetically, theta), followed by {{c||S2|d}} as it appears in both of the legible Raetic inscriptions on the roc2 KB (301 words) - 17:05, 9 April 2020
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène B, La Tène C2 KB (322 words) - 09:34, 8 July 2015
- |source=Pellegrini 1918: 192–193, fn 3, fig. C; PID: 33 [No. 220]2 KB (322 words) - 14:56, 15 March 2016
- |source=IR: 290 [No. 82], fig. LIV c .... In the middle of two ''striae''-groups another decoration in form of a {{c||Θ}} with a deep drilled hole in each triangle. The ''striae''-decorations6 KB (882 words) - 09:18, 29 September 2015
- | STERIO EXIMNII F(ILIUS) F(OCUNAS) MILES [...] EX C(O)HOR(TE) RAET(ORUM) ET VENDEL(ICORUM) c) Other5 KB (715 words) - 01:03, 22 February 2017
- ...ed in the area of the modern piece. Between the ''striae''-decorations a {{c||Θ}}-shaped character which is part of the ornamentation. Decorations befo2 KB (307 words) - 17:33, 27 October 2015
- ...used at times until the 4th century AC. Franz confirms a dating to La Tène C and La Téne D concerning the findings discovered by Kasseroler, i.e. betwe3 KB (384 words) - 11:59, 11 May 2015
- ...ns; on the rim on the right side as the helmet is worn, embossed {{c||R}}{{c||R|d}} (height 0.6 cm), possibly a manufacturer's mark (cf. {{bib|Reinecke7 KB (1,037 words) - 23:31, 20 May 2020
- ...18|characters]] from right to left composed by the two characters {{c|E}}{{c|K}}. To be compared with the [[index::VN-12|characters]] of [[index::VN-126 KB (966 words) - 14:40, 14 March 2016
- ...script, or even obvious ornaments of the {{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}-type.11 KB (1,616 words) - 21:02, 8 April 2020
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène B, La Tène C3 KB (391 words) - 13:49, 10 September 2015
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène B, La Tène C3 KB (424 words) - 13:41, 10 September 2015
- *[[index::NO-6]] and [[index::SZ-40]] appear to be delimited by a mark {{c||punctuation10}} (oblique strokes in SZ-40), though is is not sure that the ...both cases, the interpretation of the inscription strongly suggests that {{c||Θ}} is to be read not as a letter Theta, but as a delimiter.38 KB (4,887 words) - 16:11, 14 November 2021
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C3 KB (412 words) - 11:50, 16 April 2020
- ...ank et al. 1985}}: 166), therefore to the Middle La Tène period or La Tène C.<br>Probably first published in {{bib|IR}}: 280 (No. 59), however with part3 KB (430 words) - 11:49, 16 April 2020
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C3 KB (465 words) - 11:48, 23 March 2016
- ...ank et al. 1985}}: 166), therefore to the Middle La Tène period or La Tène C.<br>Probably first published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228, however with parti3 KB (436 words) - 11:48, 16 April 2020
- ...thongised, possibly long /e/ was consistently written with the character {{c||addE1}}. As is customary in archaic Greek inscriptions, Etruscan inscripti ...that *Es 122 has {{c||L}}, read ''l'' by Prosdocimi; cp. Pi in the form {{c||L}} in Chiusi. Syllabic punctuation is absent.67 KB (10,434 words) - 23:57, 30 April 2020
- |source=IR: 277–278 [No. 53], pl. XLVII, fig. a, b, c3 KB (512 words) - 11:47, 16 April 2020
- ...n with the Venetic divinity ''Reitia'' (cp. {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 229, below C. Von St. Hippolyt bei Lana No. 2). Characters incised before firing.<br>The4 KB (582 words) - 09:46, 23 March 2016
- |street=Via Guido Negri 9/c5 KB (710 words) - 07:55, 27 January 2016
- ...n with the Venetic divinity ''Reitia'' (cp. {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 229, below C. Von St. Hippolyt bei Lana No. 3, fig. 3.4). Characters incised before firi4 KB (622 words) - 09:18, 23 March 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D5 KB (791 words) - 21:58, 30 March 2016
- |culture_archaeological=La Tène C, La Tène D6 KB (923 words) - 12:42, 14 March 2016
- ...ects the dependence on the northern Urnfield cultures, Laugen-Melaun B and C (Early Iron Age) show a reorientation towards the south-east Este culture ( ...e three areas can be observed from around the turn of the Early (Hallstatt C–D) to the Late (La Tène) Iron Age, though they never consolidate to form39 KB (6,050 words) - 10:42, 9 April 2020