Search results

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Results 21 – 121 of 618
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  • {{inscription ...entification with {{bib|PID}} 207 b, and assigned the sigla SA-50 a to the inscription published in {{bib|PID}}, SA-50 b to the one seen by him.
    1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....1 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....2 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|sort=sortform|format=ol|?text_plain=|limit=1000}}
    121 bytes (14 words) - 03:33, 12 August 2013
  • {{inscription ...rranged into a Lepontic "butterfly" san. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription. In any case, no reading can be offered.
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....9 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....4 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...the frame lines, possibly followed by a frame line marking the end of the inscription.
    1 KB (172 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...eceded by {{c||S|d}}. No further reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    900 bytes (122 words) - 20:36, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...osion, but the reading {{w||þine}} is supported by [[index::SZ-33|the same inscription occurring in the same place on another iron farming implement]].
    936 bytes (124 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...an be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratch
    952 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-9 in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|Schumacher 2004|2004}}.
    633 bytes (75 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...are fairly well distinguishable, though the white inlay is misleading. The inscription features additional little crosses similar to [[index::SZ-44.1]].
    942 bytes (123 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...r and connected with a horizontal line on top, indicate the presence of an inscription (length 79 cm). No reading can be offered.
    937 bytes (130 words) - 20:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ve the preserved ones; in light of the above considerations concerning the inscription's original length, we prefer {{p||e}} as the typical auslaut of Raetic indi
    2 KB (391 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 7.0 cm. The inscription is in excellent condition, the reading is unambiguous.
    1 KB (167 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
  • ...of the type Almgren 65 with a Raetic inscription. For fibulae with Raetic inscription see in particular ''Liste I: Almgren 65'' and table 2.
    653 bytes (99 words) - 14:36, 8 January 2015
  • {{inscription ...Raetic context and may be an import and/or indicate a recent date for the inscription.
    1 KB (215 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    200 bytes (22 words) - 15:21, 28 February 2014
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-10 (the first of the two) in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|S
    749 bytes (96 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ft {{c||I}}, incised before burning, is part of the ornamentation, not the inscription.
    706 bytes (96 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...w||upi}} supports the reading. Very probably an [[index::SZ-88.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    766 bytes (101 words) - 23:26, 13 December 2021
  • $
    {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    219 bytes (26 words) - 12:35, 24 January 2014
  • ...axe]]|format=count}}x), mostly from [[index::Sanzeno]] ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]][[object.site::Sanzeno]]|format=count}}x). {{c||L}} ...hasta in writing direction shortened). They are always accompanied by the inscription {{w||uθiiθi}}.
    3 KB (447 words) - 13:41, 12 May 2016
  • {{inscription ...valley. Also the shape of the sherd suggests that on the upright bowl the inscription was seen as shown in the drawing.
    1 KB (209 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.1 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]]
    733 bytes (93 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Length 1.9 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-79.1|an identical inscription on the opposite side]].
    693 bytes (88 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...m, are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    1 KB (162 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
  • |title=L'Inscription Rétique de Castelcies
    228 bytes (26 words) - 15:21, 16 January 2014
  • {{inscription ...e at the right breaking edge, at a distance of about a centimeter from the inscription.
    765 bytes (103 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...from {{bib|PID}}, while SA-55 was seen by him but not identified with the inscription on {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s "chisel". Independently of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}
    1 KB (163 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • ...ccordance with Marstrander's reading and interpretation in April 2020. The inscription is now filed in ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univ [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    1 KB (199 words) - 21:10, 23 April 2020
  • {{inscription Length 1.1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.1|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on
    773 bytes (101 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.6 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-46.2]]
    762 bytes (97 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...t. Possibly non- or pseudo-script; maybe Latin (two potsherds with a Latin inscription come from the same context). See [[index::Non-script notational systems]].
    1 KB (175 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Length 1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.2|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on
    772 bytes (101 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 20:26, 3 January 2015
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 20:58, 6 December 2016
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 14:14, 4 January 2014
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    101 bytes (11 words) - 14:43, 18 January 2016
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 11:24, 16 September 2014
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    101 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 18 January 2016
  • {{inscription ...taller than {{c|Χ|Χ3}} and also {{c||I}}. Apart from the shape of Khi, the inscription is identical to [[index::SZ-17]], including tall Sigma with the upper angle
    1 KB (165 words) - 21:44, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...overse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight
    1 KB (195 words) - 20:49, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...also above the curved crack – it is not possible to determine how far the inscription extended. No further reading can be offered.
    1 KB (178 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...d bars of {{c||E3|d}}, an interpretation of the group as the remains of an inscription is not unlikely (but note the superfluous small straight bar between the cu
    1 KB (170 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo and transcription of the inscription).
    1 KB (178 words) - 20:53, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2}}. Probably an owner's inscription.
    2 KB (212 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ndex::SZ-73.2|letters on the other side of the neck-guard]] are a discrete inscription.
    1 KB (168 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...nscription, an asterisk {{c||symbol2}}. {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, who saw the inscription in 1923, read (dextroverse) ''kuθ''[. Compare [[index::SZ-65.1]] / [[index
    1 KB (161 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...possibly part of a longer sequence. Assuming that the orientation of this inscription is in accordance with that of [[index::VN-14.1]], we should be faced with t
    879 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...a is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]] and [[index::SZ-46.2]]. Besides the inscription, two symbols {{c|symbol|symbol2}} (the top half missing) and {{c|symbol}} (
    814 bytes (113 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.9 cm. The characters are unambiguous and clearly visible despite c
    805 bytes (101 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete for unknown reasons. The fragmentary
    2 KB (257 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...he left, but unambiguous. Based on comparison with [[index::BZ-25.2]], the inscription is probably complete.
    845 bytes (115 words) - 17:33, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.3 cm. If the characters are letters, the two oblique strokes visib
    801 bytes (97 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.5 cm. The left half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguisha
    822 bytes (107 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 3.9 cm. The top half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguishab
    824 bytes (112 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.2 cm. The white inlay does not fill all the clearly visible stroke
    835 bytes (104 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...7|Franz}} to read the St. Andrew's cross as {{c||symbol}} and classing the inscription as one of his "Reitia-Inschriften".
    798 bytes (104 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Hardly readably due to corrosion, but apparently the inscription does not belong with [[index::uθiiθi|this group]].
    881 bytes (105 words) - 21:51, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...uous; the closeness of the breaking edge to the last letter allows for the inscription to have continued beyond that point.
    1 KB (179 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...tinguishable due to heavy corrosion, but compare [[index::SZ-79.2|the same inscription repeated on the object]] as well as other occurrences of {{w||upi}}.
    820 bytes (113 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription The remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 4, to the immediate right of [[index::AK-1.12]], sharing a fr
    974 bytes (122 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • Recurring as a one-word "inscription" in the same place on ceramics from [[index::Sanzeno]]. An abbreviation / f
    219 bytes (28 words) - 16:21, 11 March 2014
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.8 cm. SZ-45.2 differs from the [[index::la|similar inscriptions on
    886 bytes (120 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.3 cm. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-47]]. See [[index::???|here]] for
    875 bytes (115 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ib|PID|Whatmough}} sub "Addenda" – nobody seems to have examined object or inscription since the original publication, which contains only a schematic rendering o
    962 bytes (131 words) - 21:00, 8 November 2021
  • |subtitle=A comprehensive analysis of inscription and decorative program
    313 bytes (37 words) - 00:35, 17 March 2020
  • {{inscription The heavily eroded remains of an inscription running vertically from the foot of the rock upwards, slightly to the right
    948 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • Documented only once in a Latinoid inscription; for problems with the reading see [[index::BZ-24|there]].
    296 bytes (37 words) - 17:53, 1 June 2015
  • {{inscription ...character in the centre is probably misrepresented. In light of the recent inscription finds from [[index::Bostel]], AS-1 may have (had) linguistic content, but w
    2 KB (250 words) - 20:42, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ee {{w||la}}). The object bears [[index::SZ-57.2|another, almost identical inscription]].
    896 bytes (114 words) - 23:21, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 4.2 cm. The characters may be incomplete in the lower part, but it i
    870 bytes (120 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...as applied to the vessel), to the right of the centre (when looking at the inscription upright). Well legible despite the white inlay, much of which has crumbled
    2 KB (339 words) - 20:52, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ght, only an angle {{c||U3}} is left. While it cannot be excluded that the inscription is incomplete, cp. the group of scratchings on Sanzeno bowls discussed sub
    926 bytes (124 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ght. If the preserved letters constitute only the end of what was a longer inscription, it may have been a name in the [[index::-si|pertinentive case]].
    1 KB (194 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Only the upper or lower part of the inscription is left: two strokes, a chevron and probably two more strokes. {{bib|Franz
    984 bytes (134 words) - 20:55, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...T rock|Steinberg]]. We can therefore assume that the illegible part of the inscription contained at least the personal name base for the patronym.
    1 KB (214 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 3 cm. SZ-45.1 differs from the [[index::uθiiθi|similar inscription
    909 bytes (127 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...yllabic punctuation does not seem to be executed consistently. The present inscription is the only one of the group which has the sequence representing the verbal
    2 KB (275 words) - 22:12, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Length of the remains 2.1 cm. Although there might be some of the inscription missing on the left side, what can be seen is symmetrical (judging by {{bib
    988 bytes (128 words) - 21:30, 8 November 2021
  • ...cups from [[index::Rotzo]], twice in combination with a language-encoding inscription. Probably a manufacturer's mark.
    256 bytes (31 words) - 14:03, 9 November 2015
  • {{inscription ...possible comparanda on axe heads and elsewhere. As on [[index::SZ-76.1|the inscription on the other side of the object]], a bar without inlay can be made out, her
    922 bytes (135 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Length about 5 cm. Judging by the drawings, the inscription is much damaged by holes or abrasions on the surface. On the end with less
    966 bytes (122 words) - 21:22, 8 November 2021
  • ...r as well as Mancini and Schumacher only with regard to the [[index::SZ-40|inscription]].
    1 KB (125 words) - 15:23, 17 September 2015
  • {{inscription ...}, but these might be unintentional; they certainly do not belong with the inscription. {{w||χarse}} is most easily interpreted as a Raetic individual name in th
    2 KB (340 words) - 21:21, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...remarks, given context and dating, BZ-17 is highly unlikely to be a Raetic inscription, but belongs with the assortment of characters often found on bronze axes f
    1 KB (192 words) - 20:54, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...s end of the object is situated under the bars of this last letter, so the inscription can miss one or two letters at most (unless it went on on the other grip pl
    2 KB (318 words) - 21:58, 8 November 2021
  • S
    ...a]], Sigma sometimes occurs both sinistroverse and dextroverse in the same inscription (e.g. [[index::WE-3]]). The prevalent orientation, however, is with the upp
    1 KB (156 words) - 13:54, 28 April 2016
  • {{inscription ...torso, length 1.8 cm. Much more faintly embossed than [[index::SZ-8.1|the inscription on the front]]. A character like {{c||A3|d}} with elongated bar and the lef
    951 bytes (128 words) - 23:13, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.2 cm. The characters are unambiguous and clearly visible despite c
    994 bytes (132 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 3 cm. No white inlay in the third bar of {{c||E}}. After {{c||E}} a
    983 bytes (141 words) - 21:45, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...however, too much inclined to indicate a hasta. Cp. the probably identical inscription [[index::VN-3]].
    1 KB (216 words) - 22:02, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...e upper edge, the inscription is probably best regarded as a sinistroverse inscription as shown in the TIR images.
    2 KB (271 words) - 21:11, 8 November 2021
  • Possibly attested in an alphabetically Camunic inscription '''lauisiouiesuleiaklalau''' on a bronze spit from Sabbio Chiese, see Marin
    345 bytes (40 words) - 14:45, 2 May 2023
  • ...eno]].<br>In {{bib|Franz 1959}} only a transcription of the [[index::SZ-36|inscription]] (cp. {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228, pl. 3.7).<br>Autopsied by the ''Thesaurus I
    1 KB (147 words) - 15:09, 2 October 2015
  • {{inscription ...f course phonetically unfavourable, especially seeing as the ending of the inscription in -{{p||i}}{{p||e}} suggests a Raetic individual name and hence linguistic
    2 KB (273 words) - 21:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...acher}} kept the fragments separate, and therefore failed to recognise the inscription. Our reading based on the alignment of the fragments by the project's illus
    2 KB (292 words) - 18:16, 6 November 2021
  • Attested twice in the same inscription; obscure. Possibly a noun – see [[index::The Raetic language]] for a disc
    316 bytes (43 words) - 18:27, 5 October 2015

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)