Search results

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

  • |description=Describes the textual genre to which the inscription belongs. {{property_statistics|Inscription}}
    929 bytes (119 words) - 20:57, 9 January 2017
  • ...that given by {{bib|Lattes 1901}}: p. 1137 in the publication of slab A's inscription. Lattes, citing from Francesco Pellegrini's letters (written in 1896), writ ...and language. Due to the clearly Etruscoid character of the language, the inscription was used as evidence for the connection of Raetic with Etruscan, but was ev
    15 KB (2,445 words) - 23:43, 18 March 2020

Page text matches

  • |description=Direction (in degrees) of the baseline of an inscription in relation to its object. ...lways seen from the side, and the given value defines the deviation of the inscription's top from the object's top (counterclockwise):
    758 bytes (103 words) - 12:31, 10 March 2016
  • |description=Defines the vertical measure of the inscription's largest letter. {{property_statistics|Inscription|0|15|1|range}}
    276 bytes (33 words) - 18:09, 7 March 2016
  • ...imum quantity of letters, including fragmentary and inferable ones, in the inscription. {{property statistics|Inscription|0|40}}
    688 bytes (81 words) - 18:15, 7 March 2016
  • |description=Defines the vertical measure of the inscription's smallest letter. |[[Category:Inscription]][[letter height min::<0.9]];?coordinate;?text_plain=Inscription;icon=Marker_FFFFC0.png;limit=1000
    2 KB (261 words) - 17:48, 12 October 2022
  • ...m quantity of characters, including fragmentary and inferable ones, in the inscription. {{property statistics|Inscription|0|40}}.
    694 bytes (78 words) - 18:14, 7 March 2016
  • |description=Defines the number of lines of an inscription. ...ed a line, provided that the lines (are thought to) belong together as one inscription, which cannot always be determined securely.
    2 KB (294 words) - 19:42, 7 March 2016
  • ...tion=Specifies the layout of rules in the middle part of a frame around an inscription. ...etween'' the lines. ''Unknown'' indicates that in case of a partly damaged inscription, part of a frame can be seen, while the presence of other parts of the fram
    2 KB (250 words) - 01:35, 21 October 2022
  • |description=Defines the quantity of clearly countable letters in the inscription. |[[Category:Inscription]][[letter number min::<3]];?coordinate;?text_plain=Inscription;icon=Marker_FFFFC0.png;limit=1000
    3 KB (356 words) - 20:59, 5 October 2022
  • |description=Specifies the design of the left-hand side of a frame around an inscription. {{property_statistics|Inscription}}
    265 bytes (34 words) - 22:43, 20 October 2022
  • |description=Defines the quantity of clearly countable characters in the inscription. ...is not clear that any of the characters are indeed letters, i.e. that the inscription represents proper script.
    3 KB (438 words) - 16:57, 19 February 2020
  • ..._object=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[object::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}}) ...t_plain=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[script::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}})
    2 KB (284 words) - 23:03, 17 May 2016
  • |description=Describes the manner in which the inscription has been applied to the object. | inscription is executed on the mould
    3 KB (398 words) - 22:28, 1 October 2022
  • {{inscription ...isible (height about 7.5 cm), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    655 bytes (80 words) - 20:40, 8 November 2021
  • |description=Specifies the direction of writing of the inscription. ...roverse. ''Unknown'' is used only when it is not clear that the respective inscription represents proper script at all.
    3 KB (402 words) - 20:58, 5 October 2022
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Us||Ud]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::U2s||U2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (470 words) - 01:16, 27 January 2016
  • {{inscription ...are left (height about 5 cm). No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    673 bytes (83 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ps||Pd]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::P2s||P2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (434 words) - 00:59, 27 January 2016
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ls||Ld]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::L2s||L2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (358 words) - 01:03, 27 January 2016
  • {{inscription ...ture of [[index::AK-1.17]]?), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    722 bytes (92 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
  • ...c}}: 397 with fig. (an attempt of reading and interpretation of the entire inscription).
    1 KB (197 words) - 15:16, 17 September 2015
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.2 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-27.2|another, identical inscription]].
    768 bytes (93 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...9.2 cm), but no reading can be offered. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription.
    756 bytes (99 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    509 bytes (70 words) - 14:46, 29 June 2020
  • {{inscription ...belong to [[index::AK-1.12]]. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    816 bytes (104 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...le despite corrosion. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.2|another, identical inscription]].
    770 bytes (100 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...white inlay, is left. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.1|another, identical inscription]].
    764 bytes (102 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.1|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    771 bytes (95 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...bowl]]), {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} included the inscription twice: SA-81 is the inscription as published by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, SA-101 as he saw it at the [[index::
    994 bytes (127 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...7 potsherd|potsherd]], mentions only [[index::SZ-27.1|the other, identical inscription]] on the [[index::SZ-27 potsherd|object]].
    787 bytes (105 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • ...anzeno alphabets]], related to Etruscan. The linguistical ascription of an inscription to Raetic is usually dependent on the presence of certain suffixes; differe ...s of inscriptions of doubtful status, i.e. when it is not certain that the inscription has any linguistic content at all. '''None''' indicates that the marks in q
    5 KB (596 words) - 14:27, 21 May 2020
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.2|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    798 bytes (101 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • Concordance of TIR [[:Category:Inscription|inscription]] sigla with those used in the {{bib|PID|Pre-Italic Dialects of Italy (PID) {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]]|mainlabel=TIR|sort=sortform|?sigla_pid=PID|?sigla_ir=IR|?sigla_mancini=LI
    847 bytes (111 words) - 18:22, 6 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...t traces before and after it. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    832 bytes (116 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...entification with {{bib|PID}} 207 b, and assigned the sigla SA-50 a to the inscription published in {{bib|PID}}, SA-50 b to the one seen by him.
    1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....1 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....2 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|sort=sortform|format=ol|?text_plain=|limit=1000}}
    121 bytes (14 words) - 03:33, 12 August 2013
  • {{inscription ...rranged into a Lepontic "butterfly" san. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription. In any case, no reading can be offered.
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....9 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....4 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...the frame lines, possibly followed by a frame line marking the end of the inscription.
    1 KB (172 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...eceded by {{c||S|d}}. No further reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    900 bytes (122 words) - 20:36, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...osion, but the reading {{w||þine}} is supported by [[index::SZ-33|the same inscription occurring in the same place on another iron farming implement]].
    936 bytes (124 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...an be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratch
    952 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-9 in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|Schumacher 2004|2004}}.
    633 bytes (75 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...are fairly well distinguishable, though the white inlay is misleading. The inscription features additional little crosses similar to [[index::SZ-44.1]].
    942 bytes (123 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...r and connected with a horizontal line on top, indicate the presence of an inscription (length 79 cm). No reading can be offered.
    937 bytes (130 words) - 20:41, 8 November 2021
  • |description=Specifies the object on which the inscription is found.
    93 bytes (13 words) - 18:44, 14 July 2013
  • {{inscription ...ve the preserved ones; in light of the above considerations concerning the inscription's original length, we prefer {{p||e}} as the typical auslaut of Raetic indi
    2 KB (391 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 7.0 cm. The inscription is in excellent condition, the reading is unambiguous.
    1 KB (167 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
  • ...of the type Almgren 65 with a Raetic inscription. For fibulae with Raetic inscription see in particular ''Liste I: Almgren 65'' and table 2.
    653 bytes (99 words) - 14:36, 8 January 2015
  • {{inscription ...Raetic context and may be an import and/or indicate a recent date for the inscription.
    1 KB (215 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    200 bytes (22 words) - 15:21, 28 February 2014
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-10 (the first of the two) in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|S
    749 bytes (96 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ft {{c||I}}, incised before burning, is part of the ornamentation, not the inscription.
    706 bytes (96 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...w||upi}} supports the reading. Very probably an [[index::SZ-88.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    766 bytes (101 words) - 23:26, 13 December 2021
  • $
    {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    219 bytes (26 words) - 12:35, 24 January 2014
  • ...axe]]|format=count}}x), mostly from [[index::Sanzeno]] ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]][[object.site::Sanzeno]]|format=count}}x). {{c||L}} ...hasta in writing direction shortened). They are always accompanied by the inscription {{w||uθiiθi}}.
    3 KB (447 words) - 13:41, 12 May 2016
  • {{inscription ...valley. Also the shape of the sherd suggests that on the upright bowl the inscription was seen as shown in the drawing.
    1 KB (209 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.1 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]]
    733 bytes (93 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Length 1.9 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-79.1|an identical inscription on the opposite side]].
    693 bytes (88 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...m, are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    1 KB (162 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
  • |title=L'Inscription Rétique de Castelcies
    228 bytes (26 words) - 15:21, 16 January 2014
  • {{inscription ...e at the right breaking edge, at a distance of about a centimeter from the inscription.
    765 bytes (103 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...from {{bib|PID}}, while SA-55 was seen by him but not identified with the inscription on {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}'s "chisel". Independently of {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}
    1 KB (163 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • ...ccordance with Marstrander's reading and interpretation in April 2020. The inscription is now filed in ''Lexicon Leponticum'' with the new siglum [http://www.univ [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    1 KB (199 words) - 21:10, 23 April 2020
  • {{inscription Length 1.1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.1|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on
    773 bytes (101 words) - 23:23, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.6 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-46.2]]
    762 bytes (97 words) - 23:19, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...t. Possibly non- or pseudo-script; maybe Latin (two potsherds with a Latin inscription come from the same context). See [[index::Non-script notational systems]].
    1 KB (175 words) - 22:13, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Length 1 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-65.2|another, identical inscription]] on the other side of the handle. Compare maybe [[index::SZ-75]], also on
    772 bytes (101 words) - 23:22, 13 December 2021
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    101 bytes (11 words) - 14:43, 18 January 2016
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 11:24, 16 September 2014
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    101 bytes (11 words) - 16:18, 18 January 2016
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 20:26, 3 January 2015
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 20:58, 6 December 2016
  • [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    103 bytes (11 words) - 14:14, 4 January 2014
  • {{inscription ...taller than {{c|Χ|Χ3}} and also {{c||I}}. Apart from the shape of Khi, the inscription is identical to [[index::SZ-17]], including tall Sigma with the upper angle
    1 KB (165 words) - 21:44, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...overse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight
    1 KB (195 words) - 20:49, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...also above the curved crack – it is not possible to determine how far the inscription extended. No further reading can be offered.
    1 KB (178 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...d bars of {{c||E3|d}}, an interpretation of the group as the remains of an inscription is not unlikely (but note the superfluous small straight bar between the cu
    1 KB (170 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo and transcription of the inscription).
    1 KB (178 words) - 20:53, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2}}. Probably an owner's inscription.
    2 KB (212 words) - 20:50, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ndex::SZ-73.2|letters on the other side of the neck-guard]] are a discrete inscription.
    1 KB (168 words) - 23:24, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...nscription, an asterisk {{c||symbol2}}. {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, who saw the inscription in 1923, read (dextroverse) ''kuθ''[. Compare [[index::SZ-65.1]] / [[index
    1 KB (161 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...possibly part of a longer sequence. Assuming that the orientation of this inscription is in accordance with that of [[index::VN-14.1]], we should be faced with t
    879 bytes (116 words) - 23:32, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...a is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]] and [[index::SZ-46.2]]. Besides the inscription, two symbols {{c|symbol|symbol2}} (the top half missing) and {{c|symbol}} (
    814 bytes (113 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.9 cm. The characters are unambiguous and clearly visible despite c
    805 bytes (101 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete for unknown reasons. The fragmentary
    2 KB (257 words) - 21:12, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...he left, but unambiguous. Based on comparison with [[index::BZ-25.2]], the inscription is probably complete.
    845 bytes (115 words) - 17:33, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 1.3 cm. If the characters are letters, the two oblique strokes visib
    801 bytes (97 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.5 cm. The left half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguisha
    822 bytes (107 words) - 21:46, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 3.9 cm. The top half of the second {{c||Θ}} is hardly distinguishab
    824 bytes (112 words) - 21:47, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.2 cm. The white inlay does not fill all the clearly visible stroke
    835 bytes (104 words) - 21:43, 8 November 2021
  • |description=Describes the location of the inscription on the object. ...ow, which does not only avoid confusion, but also allows the comparison of inscription positions on objects of similar types, e.g. on ''blades'' of knives, swords
    2 KB (368 words) - 12:47, 16 August 2016
  • {{inscription ...7|Franz}} to read the St. Andrew's cross as {{c||symbol}} and classing the inscription as one of his "Reitia-Inschriften".
    798 bytes (104 words) - 22:18, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Hardly readably due to corrosion, but apparently the inscription does not belong with [[index::uθiiθi|this group]].
    881 bytes (105 words) - 21:51, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...uous; the closeness of the breaking edge to the last letter allows for the inscription to have continued beyond that point.
    1 KB (179 words) - 23:31, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...tinguishable due to heavy corrosion, but compare [[index::SZ-79.2|the same inscription repeated on the object]] as well as other occurrences of {{w||upi}}.
    820 bytes (113 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription The remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 4, to the immediate right of [[index::AK-1.12]], sharing a fr
    974 bytes (122 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • Recurring as a one-word "inscription" in the same place on ceramics from [[index::Sanzeno]]. An abbreviation / f
    219 bytes (28 words) - 16:21, 11 March 2014

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)