AK-1.16: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=damaged | |condition=damaged | ||
|culture_archaeological=La Tène | |||
|sortdate=-250 | |||
|date=5th–1st centuries BC | |||
|checklevel=4 | |checklevel=4 | ||
|problem=Maße, Abgleich Gugsi, Verweise AK-1.11 und Größe, drinlassen? | |problem=Maße, Abgleich Gugsi, Verweise AK-1.11 und Größe, drinlassen? | ||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
The very doubtful remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 5, to the right of [[index::AK-1.15]]. Only faint traces are left. A tentative reading of the group to the left of the third letter of [[index::AK-1.17]] is dextroverse {{c||A3|d}}{{c||L3|d}}{{c||punctuation|d}}{{c||E|d}} {{m||-(a)le|al·e}}, but while Cadore-style {{c||L3|d}} is documented in [[index::ST-5]] and possibly [[index::AK-1.11]], this reading might be purely epigraphic fancy. Also, the characters are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription. | The very doubtful remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 5, to the right of [[index::AK-1.15]]. Only faint traces are left. A tentative reading of the group to the left of the third letter of [[index::AK-1.17]] is dextroverse {{c||A3|d}}{{c||L3|d}}{{c||punctuation|d}}{{c||E|d}} {{m||-(a)le|al·e}}, but while Cadore-style {{c||L3|d}} is documented in [[index::ST-5]] and possibly [[index::AK-1.11]], this reading might be purely epigraphic fancy. Also, the characters are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 15:06, 19 November 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ? |
Original script: | ? |
| |
Object: | AK-1 rock (stone) (Inscriptions: AK-1.1, AK-1.2, AK-1.3, AK-1.4, AK-1.5, AK-1.6, AK-1.7, AK-1.8, AK-1.9, AK-1.10, AK-1.11, AK-1.12, AK-1.13, AK-1.14, AK-1.15, AK-1.16, AK-1.17, AK-1.18, AK-1.19, AK-1.20, AK-1.21) |
Position: | right area"right area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property., lower area"lower area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | unknown |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène |
Date of inscription: | 5th–1st centuries BC |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | none |
Images
Inscription AK-1.16.
|
Tracing of inscriptions on AK-1 rock.
|
Inscription AK-1.16.
|
Commentary
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Picture in Mandl 2011: Abb. 142 (photo). Photo of the entire rock wall in Mandl 2011: Abb. 136.
The very doubtful remains of a vertical inscription on Bildstelle 5, to the right of AK-1.15. Only faint traces are left. A tentative reading of the group to the left of the third letter of AK-1.17 is dextroverse al·e, but while Cadore-style is documented in ST-5 and possibly AK-1.11, this reading might be purely epigraphic fancy. Also, the characters are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
Bibliography
Mandl 2011 | Franz Mandl, Felsbilder. Österreich – Bayern: Nördliche Kalkalpen [= Anisa – Verein für alpine Forschung 4], Haus im Ennstal: 2011. |
---|