VN-1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Mayr 1953}}: 365 (drawings and photo = {{bib|Mayr 1956b}}), {{bib|Lunz 1981}}: Taf 85 (photo), {{bib|IR}} (drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | Pictures in {{bib|Mayr 1953}}: 365 (drawings and photo = {{bib|Mayr 1956b}}), {{bib|Lunz 1981}}: Taf 85 (photo), {{bib|IR}} (drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | ||
Inscribed on a handle or grip made of antler, running all the way from the thinner to the broader end (about 4.5 cm). The letters become increasingly smaller towards the left, because the writer avoided the small screw hole by swerving upwards. Although the object is somewhat damaged by erosion on the thinner end, there is no reason to believe that a substantial part of object or inscription is missing. The fact that the upper tip of the first {{c|A|A7}} is in evidence suggests that the object had much the same shape as today, with the height of the letters being accomodated to it. The surface is much corroded; while some of the scratches are well visible, others are all but gone. | |||
The first part of the inscription {{c||L2}}{{c||E}}{{c||I}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||I}}{{c||V3}}{{c||A7}}{{c||L2}} is comparatively well readable and unambiguous. {{c||S|d}} has a distinct angle in the upper bend, but is more smoothly curved in the lower half. Starting from {{c||S|d}}, the letters become more crowded. The second {{c||L2}} is followed by a problematic group (see drawing), probably a writing mistake: {{c||A7}} seems to be rendered more slender than drawn at first by a vertical scratch cutting through the left hasta; the remains of said hasta appear to be covered by the lower bar of {{c||V3}}. Another possibility is that the writer erroneously carved two straight hastae, then tried to arrange an {{c||A7}} between them. The reading {{c||V3}}{{c||A7}} is based on the observation that the second part of the inscription repeats the first sequence. | |||
{{c||U2}}{{c||L2}}{{c||A7}}{{c||E}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||I}} is clear despite the crowding of the letters in the upper left corner. {{c||S|d}} is the same shape as before. | |||
Although the presence of the Raetic individual name {{w||lavise|Lavise}} can be determined, the precise import of the inscription is unclear. {{w||lavise|Lavise}} appearing first with {{p||i}} before final {{p||e}} is not necessarily problematic, as we have evidence of a variation -{{p||e}} ~ -{{p||i}}{{p||e}} in the typically vocalic endings of Raetic individual names (though nowhere else documented in the same name). More conspicuous is the sequence {{p||a}}{{p||l}}{{p||u}}, which may be either a separate word or a morpheme suffixed to {{w||lavise}}. An alternative reading {{p||a}}{{p||n}}{{p||u}} would allow us to interpret the entire inscription as a bipartite Raetic name formula with a patronymic in {{m||-nu}} and some unusual treatment of the auslaut of the individual name (-{{p||e}} vs. -{{p||i}}{{p||e}}; insertion of {{p||a}} before the suffix), but while inverted {{c||N2}} is arguably known from inscriptions in the Bozen area ([[index::BZ-1]], [[index::BZ-2]]), no trace of an additional bar to the left of {{c||L2}} can be made out. | |||
The group of scratches in the lower corner on the broad end, read {{w||þinaχe|tinaχ}} by {{bib|Mayr 1956b}}: 245 f., is too untidy to be arranged into letters, apart from {{c||Θ}} to the very right, then a vertical scratch {{c||I}}, and possibly {{c||V2}} – the rest is a profusion of intersecting scratches. Probably non-script, though the function is unclear. Cp. the non-inscriptions [[index::VN-5.1]] and [[index::VN-6]] on bones from the [[index::Ganglegg]], which also contain the sequence {{c||V}}{{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 14:47, 6 October 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | lavisielavisealu |
Original script: | |
| |
Object: | VN-1 antler (antler) |
Position: | |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 1.2 cm – 2.6 cm |
Number of letters: | 16 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete, damaged |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | Raetic, unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 103 LIR BZ-22 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 177 |
Images
Object VN-1 antler with inscription VN-1.
|
Inscription VN-1 - detail.
|
Inscription VN-1 - detail.
|
Commentary
First published in Mayr 1953.
Pictures in Mayr 1953: 365 (drawings and photo = Mayr 1956b), Lunz 1981: Taf 85 (photo), IR (drawing = LIR).
Inscribed on a handle or grip made of antler, running all the way from the thinner to the broader end (about 4.5 cm). The letters become increasingly smaller towards the left, because the writer avoided the small screw hole by swerving upwards. Although the object is somewhat damaged by erosion on the thinner end, there is no reason to believe that a substantial part of object or inscription is missing. The fact that the upper tip of the first is in evidence suggests that the object had much the same shape as today, with the height of the letters being accomodated to it. The surface is much corroded; while some of the scratches are well visible, others are all but gone.
The first part of the inscription is comparatively well readable and unambiguous. has a distinct angle in the upper bend, but is more smoothly curved in the lower half. Starting from , the letters become more crowded. The second is followed by a problematic group (see drawing), probably a writing mistake: seems to be rendered more slender than drawn at first by a vertical scratch cutting through the left hasta; the remains of said hasta appear to be covered by the lower bar of . Another possibility is that the writer erroneously carved two straight hastae, then tried to arrange an between them. The reading is based on the observation that the second part of the inscription repeats the first sequence. is clear despite the crowding of the letters in the upper left corner. is the same shape as before.
Although the presence of the Raetic individual name Lavise can be determined, the precise import of the inscription is unclear. Lavise appearing first with i before final e is not necessarily problematic, as we have evidence of a variation -e ~ -ie in the typically vocalic endings of Raetic individual names (though nowhere else documented in the same name). More conspicuous is the sequence alu, which may be either a separate word or a morpheme suffixed to lavise. An alternative reading anu would allow us to interpret the entire inscription as a bipartite Raetic name formula with a patronymic in -nu and some unusual treatment of the auslaut of the individual name (-e vs. -ie; insertion of a before the suffix), but while inverted is arguably known from inscriptions in the Bozen area (BZ-1, BZ-2), no trace of an additional bar to the left of can be made out.
The group of scratches in the lower corner on the broad end, read tinaχ by Mayr 1956b: 245 f., is too untidy to be arranged into letters, apart from to the very right, then a vertical scratch , and possibly – the rest is a profusion of intersecting scratches. Probably non-script, though the function is unclear. Cp. the non-inscriptions VN-5.1 and VN-6 on bones from the Ganglegg, which also contain the sequence .
Bibliography
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
---|---|
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
Lunz 1981 | Reimo Lunz, Archäologie Südtirols. Von den Jägern des Mesolithikums (um 7000 v. Chr.) bis zum Ende des Weströmischen Reiches (476 n. Chr.) [= Archäologische Forschungen in Tirol 7], Calliano (Trento): 1981. |
Mayr 1953 | Karl M. Mayr, "Rätische Votivinschrift vom Tartscherbühel bei Mals", Der Schlern 27 (1953), 365–367. |
Mayr 1956b | Karl M. Mayr, "Hirschhornvotive aus den rätischen Bergen", Der Schlern 30 (1956), 245–246. |