ST-1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
First published in {{bib|Vetter 1957}}. | First published in {{bib|Vetter 1957}}. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Vetter 1957}}: Taf. VI (photos = {{bib|Mayr 1960}}: Abb. 2 and 3), {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 35 (drawing = {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}: Taf. 8,2), {{bib|Joppich 1971}}: 41 (drawing), {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}: Fig. 1 (drawing), {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 18 (drawing) and {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 1, 130, 131, 133 (photos). | Pictures in {{bib|Vetter 1957}}: Taf. VI (photos = {{bib|Mayr 1960}}: Abb. 2 and 3), {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 35 (drawing = {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}: Taf. 8,2), {{bib|Joppich 1971}}: 41 (drawing), {{bib|Gleirscher 1991}}: Abb. 3 (photo), {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}: Fig. 1 (drawing), {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 18 (drawing) and {{bib|Mandl 2011}}: Abb. 1, 130, 131, 133 (photos). Numerous casts have been made of the Steinberg inscriptions; the most recent one, made by the Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Innsbruck in 1995, can be seen at the [[index::Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum]]. | ||
Length about 80 cm, running towards the ground. Situated on the right-hand side just behind the entrance to the crevice, the leftmost of a group of three; fairly well legible despite erosion. The impression of a line framing the inscription on the left side is due to some scratches belonging to more recent graffiti. Our reading follows {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 344 f. and 351 ff. The first {{c||A20}} and {{c||U2}} are inverted in opposition to the rest of this inscription and the associated inscriptions [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]]. {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}}'s assumption (p. 388) that the writer changed position after the first two letters explains only inverted {{c||A20}}. The reading of the sequence after {{c||U2}} is impeded by a petrograph in the shape of a multiple cross: The two vertical lines following the two {{c||N}}s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final {{c||T}} seen by {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} (p. 388) could not be confirmed by {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}, who thinks that {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} fancied seeing the letter because it also appears at the end of [[index::ST-2]]. | Length about 80 cm, running towards the ground. Situated on the right-hand side just behind the entrance to the crevice, the leftmost of a group of three; fairly well legible despite erosion. The impression of a line framing the inscription on the left side is due to some scratches belonging to more recent graffiti. Our reading follows {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 344 f. and 351 ff. The first {{c||A20}} and {{c||U2}} are inverted in opposition to the rest of this inscription and the associated inscriptions [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]]. {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}}'s assumption (p. 388) that the writer changed position after the first two letters explains only inverted {{c||A20}}. The reading of the sequence after {{c||U2}} is impeded by a petrograph in the shape of a multiple cross: The two vertical lines following the two {{c||N}}s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final {{c||T}} seen by {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} (p. 388) could not be confirmed by {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}, who thinks that {{bib|Vetter 1957|Vetter}} fancied seeing the letter because it also appears at the end of [[index::ST-2]]. | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The sequence can be segmented into a typical two-part Raetic name in the pertinentive case. Note that though the inscription seems to be written in a different hand, it belongs with the two inscriptions [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]] which are written to its immediate right – either Kastrie was travelling or out working with two sons, or his sons added their names to that of their father at a later date. The former theory could explain the change of ductus in ST-1, if Kastrie started writing, but then decided to let one of his offspring finish, who carved the last letters including {{c|U|U5}} and {{c|A|A19}} in the style of [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]]. The latter theory is supported by the fact that ST-1 is more weathered than the other inscriptions and lacks a frame; also mark that the others may have been longer. | The sequence can be segmented into a typical two-part Raetic name in the pertinentive case. Note that though the inscription seems to be written in a different hand, it belongs with the two inscriptions [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]] which are written to its immediate right – either Kastrie was travelling or out working with two sons, or his sons added their names to that of their father at a later date. The former theory could explain the change of ductus in ST-1, if Kastrie started writing, but then decided to let one of his offspring finish, who carved the last letters including {{c|U|U5}} and {{c|A|A19}} in the style of [[index::ST-2]] and [[index::ST-3]]. The latter theory is supported by the fact that ST-1 is more weathered than the other inscriptions and lacks a frame; also mark that the others may have been longer. | ||
Further references: {{bib|Mayr 1960}}: 309 f., {{bib|Pisani 1964}}: 137 bis, {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 35, 45 incl. {{bib|Joppich 1971}}: 41, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 232, '''{{bib|Sydow 1989}}: 68 ff.''', {{bib|Schürr 2001}}: 215 f, {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}: 50. | Further references: {{bib|Mayr 1958b}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960}}: 309 f., {{bib|Pisani 1964}}: 137 bis, {{bib|Prosdocimi 1971}}: 35, 45 incl. {{bib|Joppich 1971}}: 41, {{bib|Schürr 1975}}: 606, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 232, '''{{bib|Sydow 1989}}: 68 ff.''', {{bib|Schürr 2001}}: 215 f., {{bib|Zavaroni 2004}}: 50. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 16:33, 23 July 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | kastriesieθunnuale |
Original script: | A19 sA20 s |
| |
Object: | ST rock (stone) (Inscriptions: ST-1, ST-2, ST-3, ST-4, ST-5, ST-6, ST-7, ST-8, ST-9) |
Position: | right-hand side"right-hand side" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
Orientation: | 90° |
Frame: | ? (unknown, bottom, none) |
Script: | North Italic script (Alphabet of Steinberg"Alphabet of Steinberg" is not in the list (Venetic alphabet, Magrè alphabet, Sanzeno alphabet, Lugano alphabet, ?) of allowed values for the "alphabet" property.) |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 77 cm <br /> – 8 cm |
Number of letters: | 18 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | 'of/by Kastrie Eθunnu' |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 106 LIR STN-1 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 191, 222, 342 ff. |
Images
Commentary
First published in Vetter 1957.
Pictures in Vetter 1957: Taf. VI (photos = Mayr 1960: Abb. 2 and 3), Prosdocimi 1971: 35 (drawing = Schumacher 1992: Taf. 8,2), Joppich 1971: 41 (drawing), Gleirscher 1991: Abb. 3 (photo), Zavaroni 2004: Fig. 1 (drawing), Schumacher 2004: Taf. 18 (drawing) and Mandl 2011: Abb. 1, 130, 131, 133 (photos). Numerous casts have been made of the Steinberg inscriptions; the most recent one, made by the Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Innsbruck in 1995, can be seen at the Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum.
Length about 80 cm, running towards the ground. Situated on the right-hand side just behind the entrance to the crevice, the leftmost of a group of three; fairly well legible despite erosion. The impression of a line framing the inscription on the left side is due to some scratches belonging to more recent graffiti. Our reading follows Schumacher 2004: 344 f. and 351 ff. The first A20 s and are inverted in opposition to the rest of this inscription and the associated inscriptions ST-2 and ST-3. Vetter's assumption (p. 388) that the writer changed position after the first two letters explains only inverted A20 s. The reading of the sequence after is impeded by a petrograph in the shape of a multiple cross: The two vertical lines following the two s belong to this group and are not part of the inscription. The final seen by Vetter (p. 388) could not be confirmed by Schumacher, who thinks that Vetter fancied seeing the letter because it also appears at the end of ST-2.
The sequence can be segmented into a typical two-part Raetic name in the pertinentive case. Note that though the inscription seems to be written in a different hand, it belongs with the two inscriptions ST-2 and ST-3 which are written to its immediate right – either Kastrie was travelling or out working with two sons, or his sons added their names to that of their father at a later date. The former theory could explain the change of ductus in ST-1, if Kastrie started writing, but then decided to let one of his offspring finish, who carved the last letters including and A19 s in the style of ST-2 and ST-3. The latter theory is supported by the fact that ST-1 is more weathered than the other inscriptions and lacks a frame; also mark that the others may have been longer.
Further references: Mayr 1958b, Mayr 1960: 309 f., Pisani 1964: 137 bis, Prosdocimi 1971: 35, 45 incl. Joppich 1971: 41, Schürr 1975: 606, Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 232, Sydow 1989: 68 ff., Schürr 2001: 215 f., Zavaroni 2004: 50.
Bibliography
Gleirscher 1991 | Paul Gleirscher, Die Räter, Chur: Rätisches Museum 1991. |
---|---|
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
Joppich 1971 | Julius Joppich, "Anhang. Tonabdruck und Korrektur zur Lesung der Felsinschriften nach Emil Vetter", in: Wolfgang Meid, Hermann M. Ölberg, Hans Schmeja (Eds), Studien zur Namenkunde und Sprachgeographie. Festschrift für Karl Finsterwalder zum 70. Geburtstag [= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft 16], Innsbruck: 1971, 41–44. |
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
Mandl 2011 | Franz Mandl, Felsbilder. Österreich – Bayern: Nördliche Kalkalpen [= Anisa – Verein für alpine Forschung 4], Haus im Ennstal: 2011. |
Mayr 1958b | Karl M. Mayr, "-", review of: Emil Vetter, "Die vorrömischen Felsinschriften von Steinberg in Nordtirol", Anzeiger der phil.-hist. Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Jg. 1957, Nr. 24 (1957), 384–398, Der Schlern 32 (1958), 303–304. |