AV-1: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|object=AV-1 ring | |object=AV-1 ring | ||
|position=outside | |position=outside | ||
|craftsmanship= | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=complete, damaged | |condition=complete, damaged | ||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 328 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 328 | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: 297–303. | |||
Pictures in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 15,2). | |||
Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298). | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 18:58, 28 April 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ṭịp̣ṛụχ̣ṇụḷạṿịṣẹẓ§̣ |
Original script: | |
| |
Object: | AV-1 ring (silver) |
Position: | outside |
Script: | Camunic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete, damaged |
Archaeological culture: | Hallstatt D [from object] |
Date of inscription: | 5th century BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | |
| |
Alternative sigla: | none |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 328 |
Images
Commentary
First published in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: 297–303.
Pictures in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = Schumacher 2004: Taf. 15,2).
Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of Rix in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298).
Bibliography
Mancini 1980 | Alberto Mancini, "Le iscrizioni della Valcamonica. Parte 1: Status della questione. Criteri per un'edizione dei materiali", Studi Urbinati di storia, filosofia e letteratura Supplemento linguistico 2 (1990), 75–167. |
---|