AV-1: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
|object=AV-1 ring
|object=AV-1 ring
|position=outside
|position=outside
|craftsmanship=embossed
|craftsmanship=engraved
|condition=complete, damaged
|condition=complete, damaged
|source=Schumacher 2004: 328
|source=Schumacher 2004: 328
Line 16: Line 16:
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: 297–303.
Pictures in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 15,2).
Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298).
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 18:58, 28 April 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ṭịp̣ṛụχ̣ṇụḷạṿịṣẹẓ§̣
Original script: line d 2 sline d 1 sline d 2 sline d 1 sline d 2 sline v 1 sline v 1 sline v 1 sZ3 sline v 1 sZ3 sE sS dI sV sA2 sL2 sU2 sN sΧ sU2 sR sP2 sI sΘ s

Object: AV-1 ring (silver)
Position: outside
Script: Camunic script
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: complete, damaged
Archaeological culture: Hallstatt D [from object]
Date of inscription: 5th century BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Language: Raetic
Meaning:

Alternative sigla: none
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 328

Images

Commentary

First published in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: 297–303.

Pictures in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = Schumacher 2004: Taf. 15,2).

Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of Rix in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298).

Bibliography

Mancini 1980 Alberto Mancini, "Le iscrizioni della Valcamonica. Parte 1: Status della questione. Criteri per un'edizione dei materiali", Studi Urbinati di storia, filosofia e letteratura Supplemento linguistico 2 (1990), 75–167.