MA-13: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading=esθua!es·sθua unknown!θel·pa?inua | |reading=esθua!es·sθua unknown!θel·pa?inua | ||
|reading_original={{c|A|A7}}{{c|U}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c||addŚ1}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|P}}{{c|Lpunct|Lpunct2}}{{c|E}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|S}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|S}}{{c|E}} | |reading_original={{c|A|A7}}{{c|U}}{{c|N}}{{c|I}}{{c||addŚ1}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|P}}{{c|Lpunct|Lpunct2}}{{c|E}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|A|A7}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|Θ}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|E}} | ||
|direction= | |direction=mixed | ||
|letter_height_min=1.3 | |letter_height_min=1.3 | ||
|letter_height_max=2.6 cm | |letter_height_max=2.6 cm | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|sigla_mancini=MA-1 | |sigla_mancini=MA-1 | ||
|sigla_mlr=55 | |sigla_mlr=55 | ||
|sigla_tm=218486 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 164, 340 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 164, 340 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
| Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
Images in {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 179, fig. 10 (drawing), {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawings), {{bib|MLR}} (photos). | Images in {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 179, fig. 10 (drawing), {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawings), {{bib|MLR}} (photos). | ||
Length 11.7 cm, starting at the (slightly) narrower end of the antler piece. The object is broken into three fragments. The sequence {{c||Θ}}{{c||A7}}{{c||U2}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||S}}{{c||punctuation7}}{{c||S}}{{c||E}} is well legible on fragment 1 (the largest). Note that Upsilon is inverted in opposition to the second instance toward the end of the inscription, which is the expected Magrè {{c||U}}. The first five letters being a little offset toward the edge, it | Length 11.7 cm, starting at the (slightly) narrower end of the antler piece. The object is broken into three fragments. The sequence {{c||Θ}}{{c||A7}}{{c||U2}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||punctuation7}}{{c||S|d}}{{c||E}} is well legible on fragment 1 (the largest). Note that Upsilon is inverted in opposition to the second instance toward the end of the inscription, which is the expected Magrè {{c||U}}. The first five letters being a little offset toward the edge, it appears that the writer started writing in dextroverse direction, then turned the object after Upsilon (the better to be able to support his hand) – cp. [[index::MA-17]]. Both other Magrè inscriptions which contain the word {{w||esθua|esθua*}} are dextroverse. In this case, Epsilon is inverted, for which cp. [[index::MA-1]], [[index::MA-6]], [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::MA-11]]. Sigma is turned with its upper angle opening in writing direction in [[index::MA-12]] and [[index::MA-14]]. {{c||E}} is heavily damaged by the break, but all three bars are discernible. The left half of the object is also broken horizontally, damaging all remaining letters but the last. {{c|A|A7}}{{c|P}}{{c|Lpunct|Lpunct2}} is clear. Of the next letter, a hasta and a bar {{c||line d 20}} are visible. The surface here and to the left of the letter is damaged, but not so much that a second bar in the lower area to form {{c||K}} (as surmised by Pellegrini) should not be discernible. Neither is the bar prolonged on the right of the hasta ({{c||T|d}}). A letter {{c||addŚ1}} San is used in the Venetic subcorpus of Cadore, but is not attested elsewhere in Raetic. {{c||N}}{{c||I}} is faint; the angle of Nu looks more like it belongs with the hasta of Iota – maybe Iota was inserted after Nu to correct a mistake, or the crampedness is due to the lack of space. {{c||U}} is smallish; {{c||A7}} is crammed into the top left corner. | ||
Syllabic punctuation is applied correctly, although the repetition of Sigma in {{w||esθua}} is unprecedented. {{w||esθua}} can be compared with a number of similar forms attested in the Magrè inscriptions and elsewhere (see the word page). The remaining sequence is unclear, but the ending is likely to be a patronym in {{m||-nu}} in the genitive {{m||-a}}. If the twelfth letter {{c||addŚ1}} is really San, a sequence {{w||paśinua}} might be compared with [[index::SZ-15.1]] {{w||paśunu}} (?). In any case, if the final form is a genitive, this would indicate that it corresponds with the supposed individual name {{w||esθua}}, which would then also have to be interpreted as a genitive. A very tentative interpretation is 'of/to Esθu*, son of Paś* ?'; {{w||θel}} is opaque. | Syllabic punctuation is applied correctly, although the repetition of Sigma in {{w||esθua}} is unprecedented. {{w||esθua}} can be compared with a number of similar forms attested in the Magrè inscriptions and elsewhere (see the word page). The remaining sequence is unclear, but the ending is likely to be a patronym in {{m||-nu}} in the genitive {{m||-l(a)|-a}}. If the twelfth letter {{c||addŚ1}} is really San, a sequence {{w||paśinua}} might be compared with [[index::SZ-15.1]] {{w||paśunu}} (?). In any case, if the final form is a genitive, this would indicate that it corresponds with the supposed individual name {{w||esθua}}, which would then also have to be interpreted as a genitive. A very tentative interpretation is 'of/to Esθu*, son of Paś* ?'; {{w||θel}} is opaque. | ||
On the back, at the broader end, an arrangement of very tidy, deeply and broadly engraved lines {{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}{{c||line v 1}} (length about 5 cm). | On the back, at the broader end, an arrangement of very tidy, deeply and broadly engraved lines {{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}{{c||line v 1}} (length about 5 cm). | ||
Latest revision as of 20:08, 8 November 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | es·sθuaθel·pa?inua |
| Original script: |            
|
|
| |
| Object: | MA-13 antler (antler) |
| Position: | front |
| Script: | North Italic script (Magrè alphabet) |
| Direction of writing: | mixed |
| Letter height: | 1.31.3 cm <br /> – 2.6 cm |
| Number of letters: | 16 |
| Number of characters: | 18 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete, damaged |
| Date of inscription: | 3rd–2nd centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | Raetic |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | PID 233 LIR MA-1 MLR 55 TM 218486 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 164, 340 |
Commentary
First published in Pellegrini 1918: 179 f. (no. 3).
Images in Pellegrini 1918: 179, fig. 10 (drawing), LIR (photo and drawings), MLR (photos).
Length 11.7 cm, starting at the (slightly) narrower end of the antler piece. The object is broken into three fragments. The sequence is well legible on fragment 1 (the largest). Note that Upsilon is inverted in opposition to the second instance toward the end of the inscription, which is the expected Magrè . The first five letters being a little offset toward the edge, it appears that the writer started writing in dextroverse direction, then turned the object after Upsilon (the better to be able to support his hand) – cp. MA-17. Both other Magrè inscriptions which contain the word esθua* are dextroverse. In this case, Epsilon is inverted, for which cp. MA-1, MA-6, MA-8, MA-9 and MA-11. Sigma is turned with its upper angle opening in writing direction in MA-12 and MA-14. is heavily damaged by the break, but all three bars are discernible. The left half of the object is also broken horizontally, damaging all remaining letters but the last. is clear. Of the next letter, a hasta and a bar 
are visible. The surface here and to the left of the letter is damaged, but not so much that a second bar in the lower area to form 
(as surmised by Pellegrini) should not be discernible. Neither is the bar prolonged on the right of the hasta (
). A letter San is used in the Venetic subcorpus of Cadore, but is not attested elsewhere in Raetic. is faint; the angle of Nu looks more like it belongs with the hasta of Iota – maybe Iota was inserted after Nu to correct a mistake, or the crampedness is due to the lack of space. is smallish; is crammed into the top left corner.
Syllabic punctuation is applied correctly, although the repetition of Sigma in esθua is unprecedented. esθua can be compared with a number of similar forms attested in the Magrè inscriptions and elsewhere (see the word page). The remaining sequence is unclear, but the ending is likely to be a patronym in -nu in the genitive -a. If the twelfth letter is really San, a sequence paśinua might be compared with SZ-15.1 paśunu (?). In any case, if the final form is a genitive, this would indicate that it corresponds with the supposed individual name esθua, which would then also have to be interpreted as a genitive. A very tentative interpretation is 'of/to Esθu*, son of Paś* ?'; θel is opaque.
On the back, at the broader end, an arrangement of very tidy, deeply and broadly engraved lines 
(length about 5 cm).
Further references: Kretschmer 1932, Vetter 1943: 80, Kretschmer 1943: 177, 179, 182, Mayr 1956b: 245, Pisani 1964: 318 (no. 134k), Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 237 f.
Bibliography
| Kretschmer 1932 | Paul Kretschmer, "Die Etruskerfrage und die Inschriften von Magrè", in: Axel Nelson (Ed.), Symbolae philologicae O.A. Danielsson Octogenario dicatae, Uppsala: 1932, 134–142. |
|---|---|
| Kretschmer 1943 | Paul Kretschmer, "Die vorgriechischen Sprach- und Volksschichten (Fortsetzung)", Glotta 30 (1943), 84–218. |
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
| Mayr 1956b | Karl M. Mayr, "Hirschhornvotive aus den rätischen Bergen", Der Schlern 30 (1956), 245–246. |
