SR-6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=North Italic script | |script=North Italic script | ||
|alphabet=Magrè alphabet | |||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown |
Revision as of 13:18, 9 July 2015
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | aṛụseθar·̣naφeris·̣nạ |
Original script: | Φ5 s |
Variant Reading: | aḷụseθar·̣na φeris·̣nạ Φ5 s |
| |
Object: | SR-6 antler (antler) |
Position: | front |
Script: | North Italic script (Magrè alphabet) |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 1.21.2 cm <br /> – 1.7 cm |
Number of letters: | 17 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete, damaged |
Date of inscription: | 3rd century BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 88 LIR SE-2 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 158 |
Images
Object SR-6 antler with inscription SR-6.
|
Inscription SR-6 - detail (miscroscopic image).
|
Inscription SR-6 - detail (microscopic image).
|
Inscription SR-6 - detail (microscopic image).
|
Commentary
First published in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 13 (no. 6). Autopsied by TIR in November 2014.
Images in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 13 (drawing) and fig. 8 (photo), IR (drawing = LIR), LIR (photo).
Length about 10 cm, starting at the broader end of the piece of antler. The first three characters are the most heavily damaged: seems comparatively clear; the next letter was read by Pellegrini, but might also be (but see below). is fairly secure again, its right hasta being affirmed by a straight breaking edge (see drawing). After the second , , damaged in the lower area, appears to have a punctuation mark inscribed into it. The letter after the third is certainly not , but Φ5 s, as already seen by Mancini. A punctuation mark is very probably situated after the second , right above the breaking edge. The object being broken into multiple fragments, it has been restored, with the group of fragments on the narrow end having been attached incorrectly; the reading of is impeded, but secure (cp. the photos and drawings provided by Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965 and Mancini). Of final , only the uppermost tip is left.
Mancini perceives the sequences aruseθarna and φerisna to be separated by a space. In any case, the final part of the inscription can be identified as the word perisna; the sequence before it may be a name, possibly a two-part name formula in the nominative arus eθar-na or aru seθar-na. Cp. SR-3.1 with possibly a name base aruś. In both parts of the inscription, the suffix -na is preceded by a punctuation mark, but it cannot be determined whether this is the intention, as the punctuation is also in line with the Venetic rules for syllable punctuation. For the inscribed punctuation mark cp. SR-1/SR-7; see Script for a discussion.
Further references: Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 22 f., Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 234.
Bibliography
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
---|---|
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |