IT-4: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
("space" is a character; do not declare characters if there is none!)
Line 21: Line 21:
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Abgetragenes Material (v.a. nach den ersten vier Zeichen fehlt der untre Teil - wie viel, ist schwer zu sagen) sowie Bruchlinien durch die Inschrift (oben, am anfang und in der mitte). zwei lakunen. riti problemlos, dann a oder e, was für die interpretation schooner wär, dann loch, dann das obere end von am e oder v, dann a obliquer strich einsam - vll a s rechtsläufig, unten abgetragen, dann wohl a i, dann chi, dann zwei zelte, serste recht gleichmäßig, szweite grad plus gebogen - ein u oder r? was dann davor - ein u, oder a mit tiefsitzendem Zweig? dann eine haste grad mit den letzten resten eines zweiges dran, loch, haste (i?), und schön le. ritie?esigurvile..
The inscription is damaged by cracks (vertical after the first four signs and before the last three, horizontal along the upper part of the middle section) and abrasion - on the middle fragment, the lower parts of the signs are gone. Two lacunae after the cracks.<br>
The signs on the first fragment are readable without difficulty: ''riθi''. Partly damaged by the crack, the next letter could be {{c|A|A|d}} (with '''unusual orientation''') or {{c|E}} with the third twig missing, which would yield ''riθie'' ('''compare ...'''). After the lacuna, the upper angle of an {{c|E}} or {{c|V}}, damaged by the horizontal crack, can be distinguished, followed by an oblique stroke, also damaged, slanting from '''left to right''' - possibly the upper third of an '''{{c|S}}'''. The following stroke could then only be read as {{c|I}}, since the next group of strokes can be identified with reasonable certainty as {{c|Χ}}. Of the next two letters, though not spoilt by the crack, only angles are left, the first with two oblique strokes - probably {{c|U}} as in case of {{c|A|A|d}} a trace of the twig should be left -, the second with one straight and one curved line, which could be {{c|U|U5}} or, considering the preceding sign, more probably {{c|R|R2}}. Right before the second crack a hasta with the trace of one twig ({{c|E}} or {{c|V}}), then the second lacuna. On the next fragment a single stroke which can hardly be anything but {{c|I}}, and finally undamaged {{c|E}}{{c|L}}. '''riθie?esigurvile'''
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 23:00, 3 December 2013

Inscription
Transliteration: riθiẹ[???]ịχ[???]ịle
Original script: E sL sI s[space sspace sspace s]Χ sI s[space sspace sspace s]E sI sΘ sI sR2 s
Variant Reading: riθiẹ[???]ịχ[???]ịpe

Object: IT-4 unknown ()
Position: outside
Script: North Italic script
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 0.9 cm – 1.3 cm
Number of letters: 14 – 17
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged, incomplete
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: Raetic
Meaning:

Alternative sigla: none
Sources: [unpublished]

Images

Commentary

The inscription is damaged by cracks (vertical after the first four signs and before the last three, horizontal along the upper part of the middle section) and abrasion - on the middle fragment, the lower parts of the signs are gone. Two lacunae after the cracks.
The signs on the first fragment are readable without difficulty: riθi. Partly damaged by the crack, the next letter could be A d (with unusual orientation) or E s with the third twig missing, which would yield riθie (compare ...). After the lacuna, the upper angle of an E s or V s, damaged by the horizontal crack, can be distinguished, followed by an oblique stroke, also damaged, slanting from left to right - possibly the upper third of an S s. The following stroke could then only be read as I s, since the next group of strokes can be identified with reasonable certainty as Χ s. Of the next two letters, though not spoilt by the crack, only angles are left, the first with two oblique strokes - probably U s as in case of A d a trace of the twig should be left -, the second with one straight and one curved line, which could be U5 s or, considering the preceding sign, more probably R2 s. Right before the second crack a hasta with the trace of one twig (E s or V s), then the second lacuna. On the next fragment a single stroke which can hardly be anything but I s, and finally undamaged E sL s. riθie?esigurvile

Bibliography