SR-10: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=unknown!???????]al·
|reading=unknown!???????]ịal·
|reading_original={{c|Lpunct}}{{c|A|A3|d}}[
|reading_original={{c|Lpunct}}{{c|A|A3}}[{{c|I}}
|direction=sinistroverse
|direction=sinistroverse
|letter_height_min=1.3 cm
|letter_height_min=1.3 cm
Line 9: Line 9:
|line_number=1
|line_number=1
|script=North Italic script
|script=North Italic script
|alphabet=Magrè alphabet
|language=unknown
|language=unknown
|meaning=unknown
|meaning=unknown
Line 17: Line 18:
|sigla_ir=92
|sigla_ir=92
|sigla_mancini=SE-10
|sigla_mancini=SE-10
|sigla_tm=218468
|source=Schumacher 2004: 159
|source=Schumacher 2004: 159
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=2
|problem=orientation
|problem=orientation, Endung: etr. Genitiv..? (Pellegrini)
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965}}: 15 (no. 10). Autopsied by TIR in November 2014.
Images in {{bib|Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965}}: 15 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LV a = {{bib|LIR}} and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}).
Length 6.6 cm. The object is broken into multiple fragments; the entire upper part of the inscription is missing apart from the last two letters. For the arrangement of the lower tips of the letters see the drawing. The rightmost trace is situated 1 cm from the drilled hole; it is probably part of the initial letter. The last letter is {{c||L}} with inscribed punctuation – the punctuation mark, an evenly rounded dot situated under the bar of {{c||L}}, is considered to be inscribed based on the comparison with word-final {{c||Rpunct}} in [[index::SR-1]] / [[index::SR-7]], but cp. [[index::SR-8]] with final {{c||S}} with the punctuation mark following the letter. For the use of Venetic syllable punctuation in Raetic context see [[index::Script]]. Before {{c||Lpunct}}, {{c||A3}} is unambiguous despite the missing upper half. The hasta immediately to its right is most likely {{c||I}} judging by its small distance from {{c||A3}}. Before that, the angle is hardly {{c||Φ2}} or {{c||Χ3}}, as the right line is vertical. For {{c||R}}, the scratch in the centre would be inexplicable. In either case, the small oblique scratch to the left of the angle would remain isolated. No further conjectures concerning the preceding letters seem possible.
Further references: {{bib|Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965}}: 23 f.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 20:29, 8 November 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: ???????]ịal·
Original script: Lpunct sA3 s[I s

Object: SR-10 antler (antler)
Position: front
Script: North Italic script (Magrè alphabet)
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 1.3 cm
Number of letters: 9
Number of characters: 10
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged
Date of inscription: 3rd century BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: IR 92
LIR SE-10
TM 218468
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 159

Images

Commentary

First published in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 15 (no. 10). Autopsied by TIR in November 2014.

Images in Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 15 (drawing), IR (photo tav. LV a = LIR and drawing = LIR).

Length 6.6 cm. The object is broken into multiple fragments; the entire upper part of the inscription is missing apart from the last two letters. For the arrangement of the lower tips of the letters see the drawing. The rightmost trace is situated 1 cm from the drilled hole; it is probably part of the initial letter. The last letter is L s with inscribed punctuation – the punctuation mark, an evenly rounded dot situated under the bar of L s, is considered to be inscribed based on the comparison with word-final Rpunct s in SR-1 / SR-7, but cp. SR-8 with final S s with the punctuation mark following the letter. For the use of Venetic syllable punctuation in Raetic context see Script. Before Lpunct s, A3 s is unambiguous despite the missing upper half. The hasta immediately to its right is most likely I s judging by its small distance from A3 s. Before that, the angle is hardly Φ2 s or Χ3 s, as the right line is vertical. For R s, the scratch in the centre would be inexplicable. In either case, the small oblique scratch to the left of the angle would remain isolated. No further conjectures concerning the preceding letters seem possible.

Further references: Pellegrini & Sebesta 1965: 23 f.

Bibliography

IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)