HU-5.2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|craftsmanship=embossed | |craftsmanship=embossed | ||
|condition=unknown | |condition=unknown | ||
|sigla_mancini=SA-19 b | |sigla_mancini=SA-19 (b) | ||
|sigla_mlr=305 (b) | |||
|sigla_tm=653549 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 331 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 331 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem= | |problem=cp. Vepelie? | ||
|disambiguation=HU-5 | |disambiguation=HU-5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Schumacher 1994}}: 315 ff. | First published in {{bib|Schumacher 1994}}: 315 ff. Autopsied by Stefan Schumacher in October 1992. | ||
Images in {{bib|Gempeler 1976}}: Abb. 11b (photo and drawing), {{bib|Schumacher 1994}}: | Images in {{bib|Gempeler 1976}}: Abb. 11b (photo and drawing), {{bib|Schumacher 1994}}: Abb. 5 (drawing based on the one in {{bib|Gempeler 1976}} = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 17,1 = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo and drawing = {{bib|Gempeler 1976}} photo and drawing). | ||
Inscribed on the upper side of the bronze's base; length about 2.8 cm. {{bib|Schumacher 1994}} describes the inscription as follows: A hasta, damaged on top by corrosion, followed by a bar {{c||line d 01}} which does not touch it – {{c||V}} or {{c||K}}? Then another hasta damaged in the middle, probably {{c||I}}. The next letters are fairly well legible. The final letter is read as a small {{c||V}} by Schumacher, based on the observation that the area above it is not corroded. The photo in Gempeler, however, does appear to show a damage; this in combination with the arbitrary smallness of {{c||V}} and linguistic considerations – maybe an individual name in -{{p||e}} as in HU-5.1? – makes a reading {{c||E}} more likely (cp. {{bib|LIR}}). | Inscribed on the upper side of the bronze's base; length about 2.8 cm. {{bib|Schumacher 1994}} describes the inscription as follows: A hasta, damaged on top by corrosion, followed by a bar {{c||line d 01}} which does not touch it – {{c||V}} or {{c||K}}? Then another hasta damaged in the middle, probably {{c||I}}. The next letters are fairly well legible. The final letter is read as a small {{c||V}} by Schumacher, based on the observation that the area above it is not corroded. The photo in Gempeler, however, does appear to show a damage; this in combination with the arbitrary smallness of {{c||V}} and linguistic considerations – maybe an individual name in -{{p||e}} as in HU-5.1? – makes a reading {{c||E}} more likely (cp. {{bib|LIR}}). | ||
The forms of Lambda demonstrates the inscription to be written in the [[index::Script|Sanzeno alphabet]]; the inscription should be considered part of the subcorpus of the [[index::Sanzeno]] votive inscriptions on bronzes (as done in {{bib|LIR}}), even though the provenance of the object cannot be verified. | The forms of Lambda demonstrates the inscription to be written in the [[index::Script|Sanzeno alphabet]]; the inscription should be considered part of the subcorpus of the [[index::Sanzeno]] votive inscriptions on bronzes (as done in {{bib|LIR}}, cp. also {{bib|Ciurletti 1992}}: 35 f.), even though the provenance of the object cannot be verified. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Latest revision as of 22:00, 13 December 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ?ịφiliẹ |
Original script: | ? |
| |
Object: | HU-5 bronze (bronze) (Inscriptions: HU-5.1, HU-5.2, HU-5.3) |
Position: | top, foot |
Script: | North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet) |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 0.60.6 cm <br /> – 1 cm |
Number of letters: | 7 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | embossed |
Current condition: | unknown |
Date of inscription: | 4th–3rd centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | typology [from object] |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | LIR SA-19 (b) MLR 305 (b) TM 653549 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 331 |
Commentary
First published in Schumacher 1994: 315 ff. Autopsied by Stefan Schumacher in October 1992.
Images in Gempeler 1976: Abb. 11b (photo and drawing), Schumacher 1994: Abb. 5 (drawing based on the one in Gempeler 1976 = Schumacher 2004: Taf. 17,1 = LIR), MLR (photo and drawing = Gempeler 1976 photo and drawing).
Inscribed on the upper side of the bronze's base; length about 2.8 cm. Schumacher 1994 describes the inscription as follows: A hasta, damaged on top by corrosion, followed by a bar which does not touch it – or ? Then another hasta damaged in the middle, probably . The next letters are fairly well legible. The final letter is read as a small by Schumacher, based on the observation that the area above it is not corroded. The photo in Gempeler, however, does appear to show a damage; this in combination with the arbitrary smallness of and linguistic considerations – maybe an individual name in -e as in HU-5.1? – makes a reading more likely (cp. LIR).
The forms of Lambda demonstrates the inscription to be written in the Sanzeno alphabet; the inscription should be considered part of the subcorpus of the Sanzeno votive inscriptions on bronzes (as done in LIR, cp. also Ciurletti 1992: 35 f.), even though the provenance of the object cannot be verified.
Bibliography
Ciurletti 1992 | Gianni Ciurletti, "Omaggio al cavaliere di Sanzeno", in: Ingrid R. Metzger, Paul Gleirscher, Die Räter / I Reti [= Schriftenreihe der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Alpenländer, Neue Folge 4], Bozen: Athesia 1992, 27–39. |
---|---|
Gempeler 1976 | Robert D. Gempeler, Werke der Antike im Kunsthaus Zürich [= Sammlungsheft 5], Zürich: Kunsthaus Zürich 1976. |
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |