AV-1: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{inscription
{{inscription
|reading=ṭịp̣ṛụχ̣ṇụḷạṿịṣẹẓ§̣
|reading=ṭịp̣ṛụχ̣ṇụḷạṿịṣẹẓ§̣
|reading_original={{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}<span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span><span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span><span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span>{{c||Z3}}{{c||line v 1}}{{c|Z|Z3}}{{c|E}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|I}}{{c|V}}{{c|A|A2}}{{c|L|L2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c|Χ}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|R}}{{c|P|P2}}{{c|I}}{{c|Θ}}
|reading_original={{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}{{c||line d 1}}{{c||line d 2}}<span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span><span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span><span style="margin-left:2px">{{c||line v 1}}</span>{{c||Z3}}{{c||line v 1}}{{c|Z|Z3}}{{c|E}}{{c|S||d}}{{c||addI1}}{{c|V}}{{c|A|A23}}{{c|L}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c||addΧ2}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|R|R2}}{{c||addP3}}{{c||addI1}}{{c|Θ}}
|direction=sinistroverse
|direction=sinistroverse
|word_number=0
|word_number=0
Line 13: Line 13:
|source=Schumacher 2004: 328
|source=Schumacher 2004: 328
|checklevel=5
|checklevel=5
|problem=craftsmanship, Zeichenformen, Lesung (Rix) = ?
|problem=craftsmanship, Lesung = ?, Angaben abgleichen mit Alphabetarien, Interpretation
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Line 21: Line 21:
Pictures in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 15,2).
Pictures in {{bib|Ziegaus & Rix 1998}}: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 15,2).


Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298).
Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298). He suggests that due to the lack of space vertically, the writer expanded the characters in breadth, leading to some unusual shapes.
 
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> discerns the following letters (sigla refer to {{bib|Mancini 1980}}):
*St. Andrew's-cross {{c||Θ}} as in Sc 4, Lu 2, Lu 3, Lu 4 and Lu 7; arguably writing a dental, though the relation to {{c||addT2}} is unclear.
*{{c||addI1}} "a tratto ortogonale" as in Sc 6 and Na 16, with the bar pointing in writing direction in Na 19, Se 1, Se 2, and apparently on [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/BS%C2%B722 BS·22]. The squiggle on the right must then be a writer's mistake.
*Greek-style {{c||addP3}}, which in the Val Camonica occurs exclusively as upside-down {{c||addP4}} (Sc 8, Na 5, Na 6, Na 8, Be 1, FN 14, FN 16).
*{{c||R2}}, a standard Val Camonica shape, stretched out and carved with a rectangular body to avoid the execution of a curve.
*{{c||U2}}, as predominant in the Val Camonica.
*{{c||addΧ2}} as occurring in Sc 6 and [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/BS%C2%B722 BS·22] in contrast to more usual {{c||Χ}}.
*A contorted {{c||N}}-shape; <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> suspects that the small upper bar  {{c||line d 2000}}  is a correction of the lower one. The standard shape in the Val Camonica is {{c||addN2}}.
*{{c||U2}}, as above.
*{{c||L}} as in Sc 1; the standard shape in the Val Camonica is {{c||L2}}. Although the bar extends very far beyond the hasta, <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span> counts out {{c||addT2}} because of the presence of {{c||Θ}}.
*{{c||A23}} with the bar not touching the angle, inclined to the left. While inverted forms are prevalent in the Val Camonica (usually congruent with the orientation of the character for {{p||u}}), the short bar, pace <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span>, is usually attached to one of the hastae.
*{{c||V}}, which does not appear in the Sondrino alphabet, where the glide is written with the character for the vowel.
*{{c||addI1}} as above.
*{{c||S|d}} with pointed angles, probably due to lack of space vertically. The letter does not occur in the Val Camonica, where {{p||s}} is written with Zeta, but {{c|S||d}} with the upper angle opened in writing direction occurs on the Sondrino stone from Montagna (PID 252), against writing direction on [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/BS%C2%B722 BS·22]; {{c||S2}} occurs on the Sondrino stone from Tresivio (PID 253) and on the [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/GR%C2%B73 Castaneda flagon], both times opened in writing direction.
*{{c|E}} written without a hasta – no parallels in any of the Transpadanian inscriptions.
*{{c||Z3}} with straight bars as opposed to the standard Sondrino form {{c||addZ3}} (orientation usually congruent with that of the letters for {{p||a}} and {{p||u}}).
 
<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Rix</span>, referring to the tentative dating of the object inferred from context, concludes that the inscription is written in a Sondrino "Uralphabet" which still shows some archaic letter forms that are more similar to those of Venetic/Etruscan script than the later standard Sondrino shapes ({{c||V}}, {{c||Z3}}, {{c||N}}).
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 19:48, 29 April 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ṭịp̣ṛụχ̣ṇụḷạṿịṣẹẓ§̣
Original script: line d 2 sline d 1 sline d 2 sline d 1 sline d 2 sline v 1 sline v 1 sline v 1 sZ3 sline v 1 sZ3 sE sS daddI1 sV sA23 sL sU2 sN saddΧ2 sU2 sR2 saddP3 saddI1 sΘ s

Object: AV-1 ring (silver)
Position: outside
Script: Camunic script
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: complete, damaged
Archaeological culture: Hallstatt D [from object]
Date of inscription: 5th century BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Language: Raetic
Meaning:

Alternative sigla: none
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 328

Images

Commentary

First published in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: 297–303.

Pictures in Ziegaus & Rix 1998: Abb. 1,3c (photo) and d, e (drawings = Schumacher 2004: Taf. 15,2).

Engraved, probably with an etcher's needle, all around the outside of the ring. The smallness of the surface available can be made responsible for the irregularities in the execution of the characters, if they are indeed such – our reading follows that of Rix in the original publication, who argues that, apart from the sequence of straight strokes and zig-zag-line, the engraving is not regular or symmetrical enough to be merely decorative (p. 298). He suggests that due to the lack of space vertically, the writer expanded the characters in breadth, leading to some unusual shapes.

Rix discerns the following letters (sigla refer to Mancini 1980):

  • St. Andrew's-cross Θ s as in Sc 4, Lu 2, Lu 3, Lu 4 and Lu 7; arguably writing a dental, though the relation to addT2 s is unclear.
  • addI1 s "a tratto ortogonale" as in Sc 6 and Na 16, with the bar pointing in writing direction in Na 19, Se 1, Se 2, and apparently on BS·22. The squiggle on the right must then be a writer's mistake.
  • Greek-style addP3 s, which in the Val Camonica occurs exclusively as upside-down addP4 s (Sc 8, Na 5, Na 6, Na 8, Be 1, FN 14, FN 16).
  • R2 s, a standard Val Camonica shape, stretched out and carved with a rectangular body to avoid the execution of a curve.
  • U2 s, as predominant in the Val Camonica.
  • addΧ2 s as occurring in Sc 6 and BS·22 in contrast to more usual Χ s.
  • A contorted N s-shape; Rix suspects that the small upper bar line d 2000 s is a correction of the lower one. The standard shape in the Val Camonica is addN2 s.
  • U2 s, as above.
  • L s as in Sc 1; the standard shape in the Val Camonica is L2 s. Although the bar extends very far beyond the hasta, Rix counts out addT2 s because of the presence of Θ s.
  • A23 s with the bar not touching the angle, inclined to the left. While inverted forms are prevalent in the Val Camonica (usually congruent with the orientation of the character for u), the short bar, pace Rix, is usually attached to one of the hastae.
  • V s, which does not appear in the Sondrino alphabet, where the glide is written with the character for the vowel.
  • addI1 s as above.
  • S d with pointed angles, probably due to lack of space vertically. The letter does not occur in the Val Camonica, where s is written with Zeta, but S d with the upper angle opened in writing direction occurs on the Sondrino stone from Montagna (PID 252), against writing direction on BS·22; S2 s occurs on the Sondrino stone from Tresivio (PID 253) and on the Castaneda flagon, both times opened in writing direction.
  • E s written without a hasta – no parallels in any of the Transpadanian inscriptions.
  • Z3 s with straight bars as opposed to the standard Sondrino form addZ3 s (orientation usually congruent with that of the letters for a and u).

Rix, referring to the tentative dating of the object inferred from context, concludes that the inscription is written in a Sondrino "Uralphabet" which still shows some archaic letter forms that are more similar to those of Venetic/Etruscan script than the later standard Sondrino shapes (V s, Z3 s, N s).

Bibliography

Mancini 1980 Alberto Mancini, "Le iscrizioni della Valcamonica. Parte 1: Status della questione. Criteri per un'edizione dei materiali", Studi Urbinati di storia, filosofia e letteratura Supplemento linguistico 2 (1990), 75–167.