SZ-14: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|direction=sinistroverse
|direction=sinistroverse
|letter_height_min=0.9 cm
|letter_height_min=0.9 cm
|letter_number_min=9
|letter_number_min=22
|letter_number_max=10
|letter_number_max=23
|word_number=4
|word_number=4
|line_number=2
|line_number=2

Revision as of 01:10, 21 February 2015

Inscription
Transliteration: φelipuriesielukuslepile / kạṛapaśna
Original script: E sL2 sI sP2 sE sL2 sS sU2 sK sU2 sL2 sE sI sS sE sI sR sU2 sP2 sI sL2 sE sΦ2 s
A sN sŚ sA sP2 sA sR sA sK s
Variant Reading: kạṛapanina
A sN sI sN sA sP2 sA sR sA sK s

Object: SZ-14 bronze (bronze)
Position: top, bottom, foot
Script: North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet)
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 0.9 cm
Number of letters: 22 – 23
Number of lines: 2
Craftsmanship: embossed
Current condition: complete
Date of inscription: 4th–3rd centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: typology [from object]

Language: Raetic
Meaning: 'of/by Φelipurie X-ed (and) Slepi, son(s)/daughter(s) of Karapaś*'

Alternative sigla: IR 27
LIR SA-8
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 135

Images

Commentary

First published in Pellegrini 1951: 315 (no. 14a). Autopsied by TIR in October 2014.

Images in Pellegrini 1951: no. 14a (photo) and 131 (14) (drawings), Ciurletti 1992: 30 (drawings), LIR (photos and drawings = IR).

Inscribed on the lower side (line 1) and on the upper side (line 2) of the bronze's base, to be read from the front; length 6.4 cm and 4.3 cm resp. The letters are well visible. The two sequences are highly likely to belong together as one inscription; our arrangement of the lines is based on the interpretation (see below); see Schumacher 1998: 109.

The reading of line 1 is unambiguous. The writer started out with slender and rather densely packed characters, then began to space them out more after E s in eluku – maybe after deciding that the whole inscription couldn't be fit on the lower side anyway. In line 2, initial K s is clear. Then, apparently a writer's mistake: two strokes, slightly inclined to the left, and another one inclined to the right, which has been struck before the second one, followed by a straight hasta considered to belong to the next letter R s. The group between K s and R s can be and is usually interpreted as an A s which had to be squeezed in, maybe after the hasta of R s was struck prematurely. After R s, A s, then a comparatively broad gap (the letters tend to overlap, where that is possible (A sR s, A sN s), but do not in this instance), but an intentional space is unlikely in regard to line 1. A sP2 sA s are clear; then, four strokes which can be read Ś s ś as well as I sN s ni, as the inscription displays both very small gaps between letters on the one hand and gaps of pretty much equal breadth between lines of one letter (tips of R s, secure N s) on the other hand. Final A sN s is unambiguous. After the last letter, two broad indentations on top and bottom of the line, filling the line between it and the horse's foreleg.

Line 1 can be segmented φelipuriesi eluku slepile, i.e. two individual names in the pertinentive separated by a ku-form. Concerning φelipuriesi: The name must be compared with the individual name on NO-3, which is usually read φeluriesi, but might indeed be φelpuriesi (written with lp in ligature). If the name on SZ-14 appears with an epenthetic vowel i, the names could be considered to be identical. Despite the lack of case correlation, the sequence in line 2 is best interpreted as the patronymic in -na on which the individual names in line 1 depend; so Schumacher 1998: 109 f., cp. also 112 and SZ-9.1 with (possibly) only the individual name appearing in the pertinentive. Note that the patronymic appears with -na, which – if Schumacher's assumption that -nu is employed in patronymics for mixed couples (p. 296) is correct – contradicts the evidence of NO-3, where the patronymic formed with -nu would determine φel(p)urie to be a male name. A less likely alternative for line 2 is reading the second dubious point as ni, which results in a sequence (a)panina, which might be compared with (a)pani(u)n. While this word is associated with the votive sphere, it does not occur on any of the other Sanzeno bronzes; also, what to do with final a – a genitive? The second A s might belong with panina (see the word page), which would leave obscure kar. A reading of the problematic second letter as E s for ker (attested elsewhere) is not possible.

Further references: Pellegrini 1951: 326 f., Mayr 1952: 176 (no. 14), Vetter 1954: 72 (no. 14), Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 224, Ciurletti 1992.

Bibliography

Ciurletti 1992 Gianni Ciurletti, "Omaggio al cavaliere di Sanzeno", in: Ingrid R. Metzger, Paul Gleirscher, Die Räter / I Reti [= Schriftenreihe der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Alpenländer, Neue Folge 4], Bozen: Athesia 1992, 27–39.
IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)
Mayr 1952 Karl M. Mayr, "Zu den Inschriften der Votive von Sanzeno", Der Schlern 26 (1952), 175–177.