Search results

|analysis_morphemic=?{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}} ...all instances of documentation of the suffix syntagma {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} without a definable individual name base.

|analysis_morphemic=kaszri{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=eθu(n){{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=piθam(n){{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=nuþ{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=φelvi{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=aθiv{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=θaθiv{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=keta{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

|analysis_morphemic=laśa{{m|-nu}}{{m|-le|-ale}}

...he {{p||a}} is part of the base {{w||perkusia}} or of the suffix {{m||-le|-ale}}, and whether 2. it is an entire word or should be segmented further. An i

|reading=)si!]ṣị )le!eṣ[???]ụale ...lus frame line) destroyed, followed by a patronymic in {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}}, of which the first two letters {{c||S|d}}{{c||E}} are legible. While we

''-le'' appears as ''-ale'' after the patronymic suffix {{m||-nu}}, which is indeed the usual context

...s attested [[index::esθuale|twice]] with the pertinentive ending {{m||-le|-ale}}, once written with Tau rather than Theta. Cp. {{w||(h)estulanuale}} in [[

...th [[index::ST-5]] and [[index::ST-6]], alpha precedes {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}}, but in [[index::ST-6]], only the element {{m||-nu}} is written between s

...ver, are unambiguous, representing the suffix syntagma {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}}, as attested repeatedly on [[index::AK-1 rock|this rock wall]] and at [[i

We can identify the Raetic suffix group {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} as documented multiple times on [[index::AK-1 rock|this rock wall]] and a

...ion of the sequence as the remains of the suffix group {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} suggests alpha. Cf. [[index::AK-1.19]], similar in size and orientation.

...{p||a}} is a generalised stem vowel. Cp. the contexts of {{m||-le}} vs. ''-ale'' of the pertinentive II. The pre-apocope auslaut *{{m||a}} can, like *{{m|

...{{c||L}} might just fit in, but all in all the reading {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} given above, while not impossible, is due more to its linguistic probabil

...with a patronymic in {{m||-nu}}, both {{m||-l(a)|-a}} (genitive) and {{m||-ale}} (pertinentive) are plausible suffixes.

|reading=pitaunesi!pitaun&#x0323;esi kaszrinuale!kaszrinu&#x0323;ale unknown!t&#91; |reading_variant={{w|ritauiesi}}[[index::kaszrinuale|kaszrinu&#x0323;ale]]t[<br>]{{c||T}}{{c||E}}{{c||L}}{{c||A14}}{{c||U}}{{c||N}}{{c||I}}{{c||R}}{

|reading=)nuale!sa&#x0323;?al·&#x0323;esta·nu·ale φakal&#x0323;e&#x0323; ...ntification of the sequence as the common suffix group {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}}. This character variant occurs in a handful of Northern Venetic inscripti

...gone. The reading is nevertheless unambiguous, including that of {{m||-le|-ale}}, though damaged by a crack. The two Sigmas of this inscription have oppos

|reading=)nuale!hes·t&#x0323;ulanu·ale ker!ker· akve ...n of the following sequence as the common suffix group {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} – so far, this character variant occurs only in this inscription (but s

...nscription is correct, we can isolate the suffix group {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} and assume a patronym in the pertinentive case, with the base illegible.

...o be a patronym in {{m||-nu}} or {{m||-na}}. (Cp. {{m||-le}} instead of ''-ale'' in [[index::SZ-14]] {{w||sletile}} and possibly also [[index::SZ-30]] {{w

...ce can be segmented into {{w||kastriesi|kastrie-si}} {{w||eθunnuale|eθunnu-ale}}. In other words, this a typical two-part Raetic name ''kastrie eθunnu''

1. Inscriptions ending in {{m||-nu}}{{m||-le|-ale}} which contain (where sufficiently well preserved) two-part name formulae

...ments, most strikingly the suffixes of the syntagma {{m||-nu}}{{m||-(a)le|-ale}}. In fact, considering that the letters of the suffix {{m||-nu}} are in th