NO-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{inscription | {{inscription | ||
|reading= | |reading=tianusa taniun!taṇ | ||
|reading_original={{c| | |reading_original={{c|N}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|T|T3}}{{c|A||d}}{{c|S||d}}{{c|U|U2}}{{c|N}}{{c|A|A5}}{{c|I}}{{c|T|T3}} | ||
|direction=sinistroverse | |direction=sinistroverse | ||
|letter_height_min=0.9 | |letter_height_min=0.9 | ||
|letter_height_max=1.4 cm | |letter_height_max=1.4 cm | ||
|letter_number_min=10 | |letter_number_min=10 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=North Italic script | |script=North Italic script | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|object=NO-2 | |object=NO-2 strainer | ||
|position=outside | |position=outside | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
|sigla_ir=75 | |sigla_ir=75 | ||
|sigla_mancini=CL-2 | |sigla_mancini=CL-2 | ||
|sigla_mlr=27 | |||
|sigla_tm=218445 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem= | |problem=Wie alt ist das Ding? Doch abgeschrieben? | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | First published in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Images in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}: Abb. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo). | |||
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w|| | The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w||tianusatau}} in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c||U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 proposed {{w||tianusatan}} with the hasta of {{c||N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] {{w||laθurusi}} {{w||tianusa}} {{w||taniun|tanin}}. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s idea that NO-2 might be a forgery based on [[index::SZ-16]] (p. 336) relied on his incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete for unknown reasons. The fragmentary word might have been {{w||taniun|tanin}} as in [[index::SZ-16]] or {{w||taniun}}. | ||
Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221. | Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:12, 8 November 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | tianusataṇ |
| Original script: |       
|
|
| |
| Object: | NO-2 strainer (bronze) |
| Position: | outside |
| Script: | North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet) |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Letter height: | 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.4 cm |
| Number of letters: | 10 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Archaeological culture: | Late Iron Age [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 75 LIR CL-2 MLR 27 TM 218445 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 |
Commentary
First published in Franz 1958b. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Images in Franz 1958b: Abb. 2 (drawing), Mayr 1960f: 389 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = LIR), MLR (photo).
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While Franz read tianusatau in spite of the oddly misaligned , Mayr 1960f: 389 proposed tianusatan with the hasta of missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription SZ-16 laθurusi tianusa tanin. Schumacher's idea that NO-2 might be a forgery based on SZ-16 (p. 336) relied on his incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete for unknown reasons. The fragmentary word might have been tanin as in SZ-16 or taniun.
Further references: Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 221.
Bibliography
| Franz 1958b | Leonhard Franz, "Eine Inschrift aus Cles", Der Schlern 32 (1958), 39–40. |
|---|---|
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
