Edit object: AS-5 potsherd

• Use ";" to separate the entries, use ":" to separate the reference from pages, use "," to separate different pages.
• Example: "Schumacher 2004: 156, 301; LIR: 210–214; Stöckli 1975: pl. 38"

Free text

== Commentary == Fragment of a ceramic vessel.<br>According to Pellegrini the fragment derives from the same kind of cup like [[index::AS-3 potsherd]], [[index::AS-4 potsherd]], [[index::AS-6 potsherd]] as well as [[index::AS-7 potsherd]]. He describes this ceramic type in the following way: "''Bicchiere ad orlo aggettante, ventre espanso verso il piede, d'argilla per lo più cinerea depuratissima, a volte però anche rossiccia, lavorato al tornio (...)''". He adds that this kind of cup is the common ceramic type of [[index::Bostel]] (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1915}}: 120). On the archaeological drawing on pl. II.6 Pellegrini represents a perfect example for this ceramic type. By comparing this drawing with the indications given by Leonardi and Ruta Serafini related to the common ceramic type in [[index::Bostel]] and the appearance of inscribed fragments as well as the fig. 36.2, it can be stated as result that only by comparing the photos and drawings the ceramic type must be ''Tipo 4b - Bicchiere carenato a corpo tozzo''. Contrary to this result however is the fact that related to this ceramic type only one, but complete extant exemplar was discovered during the excavation of 1912 and it is not one of the common pottery of [[index::Bostel]]. Due to the indications related to common ceramic type and the frequency of characters on the fragments as well as the fragmentary condition of the object it can be assumed that the fragment either derives from a ''coppa con corpo a calotta tipo 1a'' or a ''coppa con corpo emisferico tipo 1b'' or that the ceramic type is not determinable (cp. the same questionability with: [[index::AS-3 potsherd]], [[index::AS-4 potsherd]], [[index::AS-6 potsherd]] and [[index::AS-7 potsherd]]). For the [[index::AS-5 potsherd|present fragment]] Pellegrini mentions that the clay is reddish in colour (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1915}}: 121).<br>According to Pellegrini the [[index::AS-5|characters]] on the belly of the fragment are identical with the [[index::AS-12|characters]] on a [[index::AS-12|bone needle]] from [[index::Rotzo]], published by Orsi 1890 (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1915}}: 121; for Orsi cp. {{bib|Orsi 1890}}: 293).<br>The fragment was discovered during the excavation in 1912 executed by Alfonso Alfonsi, the superintendent of the [[index::Museo Nazionale Atestino]] at this time and associated with the [[index::Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici del Veneto| Reale Soprintendenza per i Musei e gli scavi di Antichità del Veneto]] conducted by Giuseppe Pellegrini during this period. The entire material discovered in [[index::Bostel]] 1912 was preserved in the ''Museo di Asiago''. Before the destruction of the museum during the war years 1915–1918 these findings were transported and securely stored in the [[index::Museo Nazionale Atestino]]. The current location is uncertain. The material can be still preserved in the [[index::Museo Nazionale Atestino]] or it is stored in the [[index::Soprintendenza per i Beni Archeologici del Veneto]]. Also possible is a storage in the newly founded museum, the [[index::Museo Archeologico dell'Alto Vicentino]] in [[index::Santorso]]. But obviously the material was traceable until 1981 because of the fact that the entire material from the excavation 1912 was documented on archaeological drawings and photos in the published work of Leonardi and Ruta Serafini (cp. {{bib|Leonardi & Ruta Serafini 1981}}: 16–34, fig. 16–31).<br>According to Leonardi and Ruta Serafini the analysis of the excavations and the material yields the following timeframe: related to the entire material and the residential structure discovered during the excavations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC (cp. {{bib|Leonardi & Ruta Serafini 1981}}: 66). Therefore, related to the potsherd, a dating to the 4th–2nd centuries BC is to be favoured.<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography).