esθua: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Attested twice with the auslaut/ending -{{p||a}}, though never in the normalised form ([[index::MA-11]] {{w||esθuva}} with the semivocalic element spelled out, [[index::MA-13]] with weird syllabic punctuation). The attestation in [[index::MA-11]] suggests a nominative, assuming that the inscription follows the same pattern as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::MA-10]] (individual name in the nominative + active preterite), though an auslaut -{{p||u}}{{p||a}} is not otherwise attested in Raetic names. [[index::MA-13]], on the other hand, indicates a genitive in {{m||-a}}, if the name corresponds with a supposed patronym in the genitive. In Rix' translation of [[index::PA-1]], the name is interpreted as a theonym, which would make its appearing in the benefactive genitive likely, but disagree with it being combined with a patronym. The word is attested [[index::esθuale|twice]] with the pertinentive ending {{m||-(a)le}}, once written with Tau rather than Theta. Cp. {{w||(h)estulanuale}} in [[index::ST-5]], also with Tau; for Lambda between Upsilon and Alpha cp. the problematic identification of Digamma in [[index::MA-11]]. | Attested twice with the auslaut/ending -{{p||a}}, though never in the normalised form ([[index::MA-11]] {{w||esθuva}} with the semivocalic element spelled out, [[index::MA-13]] with weird syllabic punctuation). The attestation in [[index::MA-11]] suggests a nominative, assuming that the inscription follows the same pattern as [[index::MA-8]], [[index::MA-9]] and [[index::MA-10]] (individual name in the nominative + active preterite), though an auslaut -{{p||u}}{{p||a}} is not otherwise attested in Raetic names. [[index::MA-13]], on the other hand, indicates a genitive in {{m||-l(a)|-a}}, if the name corresponds with a supposed patronym in the genitive. In Rix' translation of [[index::PA-1]], the name is interpreted as a theonym, which would make its appearing in the benefactive genitive likely, but disagree with it being combined with a patronym. The word is attested [[index::esθuale|twice]] with the pertinentive ending {{m||-(a)le}}, once written with Tau rather than Theta. Cp. {{w||(h)estulanuale}} in [[index::ST-5]], also with Tau; for Lambda between Upsilon and Alpha cp. the problematic identification of Digamma in [[index::MA-11]]. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 14:42, 11 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
|
| |
| Meaning: | 'Esθu(a)' (?) |
|
| |
| Paradigm: | esθua, esθuale (pertinentive) (2) |
| Attestation: | MA-11 (ẹ]ṣθuvaθinaχe), MA-13 (es·sθuaθel·pa?inua) (2) |
Commentary
Attested twice with the auslaut/ending -a, though never in the normalised form (MA-11 esθuva with the semivocalic element spelled out, MA-13 with weird syllabic punctuation). The attestation in MA-11 suggests a nominative, assuming that the inscription follows the same pattern as MA-8, MA-9 and MA-10 (individual name in the nominative + active preterite), though an auslaut -ua is not otherwise attested in Raetic names. MA-13, on the other hand, indicates a genitive in -a, if the name corresponds with a supposed patronym in the genitive. In Rix' translation of PA-1, the name is interpreted as a theonym, which would make its appearing in the benefactive genitive likely, but disagree with it being combined with a patronym. The word is attested twice with the pertinentive ending -(a)le, once written with Tau rather than Theta. Cp. (h)estulanuale in ST-5, also with Tau; for Lambda between Upsilon and Alpha cp. the problematic identification of Digamma in MA-11.
