Search results

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.2 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-27.2|another, identical inscription]].
    768 bytes (93 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...9.2 cm), but no reading can be offered. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription.
    756 bytes (99 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    509 bytes (70 words) - 14:46, 29 June 2020
  • {{inscription ...belong to [[index::AK-1.12]]. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    816 bytes (104 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...le despite corrosion. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.2|another, identical inscription]].
    770 bytes (100 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...white inlay, is left. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.1|another, identical inscription]].
    764 bytes (102 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.1|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    771 bytes (95 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...bowl]]), {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} included the inscription twice: SA-81 is the inscription as published by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, SA-101 as he saw it at the [[index::
    994 bytes (127 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...7 potsherd|potsherd]], mentions only [[index::SZ-27.1|the other, identical inscription]] on the [[index::SZ-27 potsherd|object]].
    787 bytes (105 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • ...anzeno alphabets]], related to Etruscan. The linguistical ascription of an inscription to Raetic is usually dependent on the presence of certain suffixes; differe ...s of inscriptions of doubtful status, i.e. when it is not certain that the inscription has any linguistic content at all. '''None''' indicates that the marks in q
    5 KB (596 words) - 14:27, 21 May 2020
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.2|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    798 bytes (101 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • Concordance of TIR [[:Category:Inscription|inscription]] sigla with those used in the {{bib|PID|Pre-Italic Dialects of Italy (PID) {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]]|mainlabel=TIR|sort=sortform|?sigla_pid=PID|?sigla_ir=IR|?sigla_mancini=LI
    847 bytes (111 words) - 18:22, 6 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...t traces before and after it. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    832 bytes (116 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...entification with {{bib|PID}} 207 b, and assigned the sigla SA-50 a to the inscription published in {{bib|PID}}, SA-50 b to the one seen by him.
    1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....2 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....1 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|sort=sortform|format=ol|?text_plain=|limit=1000}}
    121 bytes (14 words) - 03:33, 12 August 2013
  • {{inscription ...rranged into a Lepontic "butterfly" san. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription. In any case, no reading can be offered.
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....4 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....9 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)