VN-16: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Unpublished. | Unpublished. | ||
Inscribed on the tapered part of a bone point, running from the drilled hole towards the tip. Length 3 cm. The scratches appearing black on the light bone surface, legibility is impeded by black marks and blots, but {{c||S}}{{c||I}}{{c||R2}}{{c||A5}} is unambiguous. In the right, more heavily scorched area, a group of scratches seems to make up a variant of Heta with four bars, which is not attested elsewhere in Raetic context. Cp. [[index::VN-8]] with possibly a name in the genitive {{w||χaris}}, but note that while the status of Heta/{{p||h}} in Raetic is not quite clear, Chi is assumed to write a velar media rather than a fricative, wherefore Heta would not be an expectable orthographic variant. Another possibile reading is {{c||Θ}}{{c||E}} {{w||etaris}} with one of Theta's lines rather straight. | Inscribed on the tapered part of a bone point, running from the drilled hole towards the tip. Length 3 cm. The scratches appearing black on the light bone surface, legibility is impeded by black marks and blots, but {{c||S}}{{c||I}}{{c||R2}}{{c||A5}} is unambiguous. {{c||I}} is a little shorter than the other letters, {{c||S}} has a very short lower bar. In the right, more heavily scorched area, a group of scratches seems to make up a variant of Heta with four bars, which is not attested elsewhere in Raetic context. Cp. [[index::VN-8]] with possibly a name in the genitive {{w||χaris}} (and a similar execution of {{c||S}}), but note that while the status of Heta/{{p||h}} in Raetic is not quite clear, Chi is assumed to write a velar media rather than a fricative, wherefore Heta would not be an expectable orthographic variant. Another possibile reading is {{c||Θ}}{{c||E}} {{w||etaris}} with one of Theta's lines rather straight. | ||
On the reverse side, a neat sequence {{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}}{{c||I}} (height 1.2 cm, length 2.6 cm) must be interpreted as decoration. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 18:31, 27 October 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ?aris |
Original script: | ? |
| |
Object: | VN-16 bone point (bone) |
Position: | left area"left area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
Orientation: | 0° |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.3 cm |
Number of letters: | 5 – 6 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged |
Date of inscription: | last decade of the 2nd–1st centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | archaeological context, natural science [from object] |
| |
Language: | Raetic |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | none |
Images
Object VN-16 bone point with inscription VN-16.
|
Object VN-16 bone point with inscription VN-16.
|
Inscription VN-16 - front side.
|
Inscription VN-16 - rear side.
|
Commentary
Unpublished.
Inscribed on the tapered part of a bone point, running from the drilled hole towards the tip. Length 3 cm. The scratches appearing black on the light bone surface, legibility is impeded by black marks and blots, but is unambiguous. is a little shorter than the other letters, has a very short lower bar. In the right, more heavily scorched area, a group of scratches seems to make up a variant of Heta with four bars, which is not attested elsewhere in Raetic context. Cp. VN-8 with possibly a name in the genitive χaris (and a similar execution of ), but note that while the status of Heta/h in Raetic is not quite clear, Chi is assumed to write a velar media rather than a fricative, wherefore Heta would not be an expectable orthographic variant. Another possibile reading is etaris with one of Theta's lines rather straight.
On the reverse side, a neat sequence (height 1.2 cm, length 2.6 cm) must be interpreted as decoration.