IT-6: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in TIR. First print publication in {{bib|Salomon | First published in TIR. First print publication in {{bib|Salomon 2018}}: 93. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014. | ||
Images in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo), {{bib|Salomon 2019}}: 93, fig. 58 (drawing = drawing on this page). | Images in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo), {{bib|Salomon 2019}}: 93, fig. 58 (drawing = drawing on this page). |
Revision as of 22:41, 16 March 2020
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | aiθiu |
Original script: | |
| |
Object: | IT-6 stone (stone) |
Position: | front |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Letter height: | 1.5 cm – 2 cm |
Number of characters: | 3 – 5 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène [from object] |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Type: | unknown |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | MLR 96 |
Images
Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - upper side.
|
Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - axonometry.
|
Inscription IT-6.
|
Commentary
First published in TIR. First print publication in Salomon 2018: 93. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Images in Tischer 2006: 215, fig. 13 (photo), MLR (photo), Salomon 2019: 93, fig. 58 (drawing = drawing on this page).
Length about 3.5 cm. Despite the unambiguous alpha , possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of "butterfly" san , which is characteristic of the Lepontic alphabet. Cf. the somewhat similar arrangement of lines SR-11 on another round, but much larger stone. See Non-script notational systems for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.