UG-1.2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=damaged | |condition=damaged | ||
|culture_archaeological=La Tène | |||
|sortdate=-250 | |||
|date=5th–1st centuries BC | |||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=Abgleich mit Gugsi | |problem=Abgleich mit Gugsi | ||
| Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
The first six letters are fairly well legible despite erosion. {{c||I|d}} and {{c||S|d}} are smaller than the following letters; it is doubtful whether the hasta of {{c||T|d}} extends beyond the bar. {{c||E|d}} is followed by a slightly oblique vertical scratch, which seems to be crossed by a bar in the centre, but this bar extends in a curve through {{c||E|d}} all the way back to {{c||N|d}} and is probably unintentional. The vertical, however, is too short to be a frame line as in [[index::UG-1.1]]. The remains of at least one character follow, but no reading can be offered. | The first six letters are fairly well legible despite erosion. {{c||I|d}} and {{c||S|d}} are smaller than the following letters; it is doubtful whether the hasta of {{c||T|d}} extends beyond the bar. {{c||E|d}} is followed by a slightly oblique vertical scratch, which seems to be crossed by a bar in the centre, but this bar extends in a curve through {{c||E|d}} all the way back to {{c||N|d}} and is probably unintentional. The vertical, however, is too short to be a frame line as in [[index::UG-1.1]]. The remains of at least one character follow, but no reading can be offered. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 19 November 2014
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | istane[?? |
| Original script: |      
|
|
| |
| Object: | UG-1 rock (stone) (Inscriptions: UG-1.1, UG-1.2, UG-1.3, UG-1.4) |
| Position: | right area"right area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property., lower area"lower area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
| Orientation: | 90° |
| Frame: | ? ? (unknown, top, unknown)
|
| Script: | North Italic script |
| Direction of writing: | dextroverse |
| Letter height: | 66 cm <br /> – 10 cm |
| Number of letters: | 6 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | damaged |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène |
| Date of inscription: | 5th–1st centuries BC |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | none |
Images
 Inscription UG-1.2.
|
Commentary
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Picture in Mandl 2011: Abb. 134 (photo). Photos of the entire rock wall in Mandl 2011: Abb. 67 and 99.
Length min. 27 cm, running vertically towards the top at about 60 cm from the bottom slightly to the right of the centre of the rock wall, immediately to the right of UG-1.1. It is hard to determine whether it it also framed: The line above the letters may belong to UG-1.1; the line before the first letter may be a natural crack in the rock (see UG-1.1). Traces of a line can be detected beneath the letters , and the two following characters.
The first six letters are fairly well legible despite erosion. and are smaller than the following letters; it is doubtful whether the hasta of extends beyond the bar. is followed by a slightly oblique vertical scratch, which seems to be crossed by a bar in the centre, but this bar extends in a curve through all the way back to and is probably unintentional. The vertical, however, is too short to be a frame line as in UG-1.1. The remains of at least one character follow, but no reading can be offered.
Bibliography
| Mandl 2011 | Franz Mandl, Felsbilder. Österreich – Bayern: Nördliche Kalkalpen [= Anisa – Verein für alpine Forschung 4], Haus im Ennstal: 2011. |
|---|
