SZ-23: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|direction=ambiguous
|direction=ambiguous
|letter_number_min=3
|letter_number_min=3
|letter_number_max=6
|word_number=0
|word_number=0
|line_number=1
|line_number=1
Line 17: Line 18:
|sigla_mancini=SA-38, SA-41
|sigla_mancini=SA-38, SA-41
|source=Schumacher 2004: 137, 147
|source=Schumacher 2004: 137, 147
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=0
|problem=Autopsie Stefan, Verweis
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|PID}}. Republished in {{bib|IR}}.<br>Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 100, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 231.<br>Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo Tav. L, fig. a and drawing) and {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>The inscription erroneously bears two sigla SZ-23 and SZ-64 due to having been published twice (see '''[[index::SZ-23 handle]]'''). In {{bib|PID}}, Whatmough, following Conway, read ''ilps&#x0323;i&#x0323;i&#x0323;'', with the last three letters "incomplete at the top". Our reading based on the alignment of the fragments by the project's illustrator endorses the reading of the first three letters. Of the last three, only minimal traces are visible on the leftmost fragment; ''s'' is not verifiable. Possibly a piece went missing when the object fell apart. Mancini and, following him, Schumacher kept the fragments separate, and therefore failed to recognise the inscription.<br>The inscription is classified as being written in the Sanzeno alphabet because of the apparent presence of Sanzeno {{c|P|P2}} and {{c|L|L2}}, although there is not enough of it left to be entirely sure of its status as script.
First published in {{bib|PID}}. Republished in {{bib|IR}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
 
Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo Tav. L, fig. a and drawing) and {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).
 
The inscription erroneously bears two sigla SZ-23 and SZ-64 due to having been published twice (see [[index::SZ-23 handle]]). {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, following {{bib|PID|Conway}}, read {{w||ilps&#x0323;i&#x0323;i&#x0323;}}, with the last three letters "incomplete at the top", which suggests that more was left of the upper or lower part of the three scratches, traces of which can now be seen only on the smallest fragment, before the object came apart (see [[SZ-23 handle]]). Our reading based on the alignment of the fragments by the project's illustrator endorses the reading of the first three letters; {{p||s}} is not verifiable, although the respective scratch is slightly aslant. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} and, following him, {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}} kept the fragments separate, and therefore failed to recognise the inscription.
 
The inscription is classified as being written in the Sanzeno alphabet because of the apparent presence of Sanzeno {{c|P|P2}} and {{c|L|L2}}, although there is not enough of it left to be entirely sure of its status as script. No interpretation suggests itself.
 
Further references: {{bib|NRIE}} 100, {{bib|Battisti 1944}}: 231.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 20:09, 3 March 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ilp[?
Original script: ]P2 sL2 sI s

Object: SZ-23 handle ()
Position: outside
Script: North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet)
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Number of letters: 3 – 6
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged, fragmentary
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: unknown
Meaning:

Alternative sigla: PID 204
IR 63
LIR SA-38, SA-41
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 137, 147

Images

Commentary

First published in PID. Republished in IR. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.

Pictures in IR (photo Tav. L, fig. a and drawing) and LIR (photo and drawing).

The inscription erroneously bears two sigla SZ-23 and SZ-64 due to having been published twice (see SZ-23 handle). Whatmough, following Conway, read ilpṣịị, with the last three letters "incomplete at the top", which suggests that more was left of the upper or lower part of the three scratches, traces of which can now be seen only on the smallest fragment, before the object came apart (see SZ-23 handle). Our reading based on the alignment of the fragments by the project's illustrator endorses the reading of the first three letters; s is not verifiable, although the respective scratch is slightly aslant. Mancini and, following him, Schumacher kept the fragments separate, and therefore failed to recognise the inscription.

The inscription is classified as being written in the Sanzeno alphabet because of the apparent presence of Sanzeno P2 s and L2 s, although there is not enough of it left to be entirely sure of its status as script. No interpretation suggests itself.

Further references: NRIE 100, Battisti 1944: 231.

Bibliography

Battisti 1944 Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236.
IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)