NO-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|sigla_ir=75 | |sigla_ir=75 | ||
|sigla_mancini=CL-2 | |sigla_mancini=CL-2 | ||
|sigla_mlr=27 | |||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
First published in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | First published in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}: Abb. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}: Abb. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}), {{bib|MLR}} (photo). | ||
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w||pianusapau}} in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c||U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 proposed {{w||pianusapan}} with the hasta of {{c||N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] {{w||laθurusi}} {{w||pianus}} {{w||pani(u)n|apanin}}. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s idea that NO-2 might be a forgery based on [[index::SZ-16]] (p. 336) relied on his incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete. | The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w||pianusapau}} in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c||U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 proposed {{w||pianusapan}} with the hasta of {{c||N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] {{w||laθurusi}} {{w||pianus}} {{w||pani(u)n|apanin}}. {{bib|Schumacher 2004|Schumacher}}'s idea that NO-2 might be a forgery based on [[index::SZ-16]] (p. 336) relied on his incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete. | ||
Revision as of 05:22, 16 July 2015
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | pianusapaṇ |
| Original script: |       
|
|
| |
| Object: | NO-2 strainer (bronze) |
| Position: | outside |
| Script: | North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet) |
| Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
| Letter height: | 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.4 cm |
| Number of letters: | 10 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Archaeological culture: | Late Iron Age [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 75 LIR CL-2 MLR 27 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 |
Commentary
First published in Franz 1958b. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in Franz 1958b: Abb. 2 (drawing), Mayr 1960f: 389 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = LIR), MLR (photo).
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While Franz read pianusapau in spite of the oddly misaligned , Mayr 1960f: 389 proposed pianusapan with the hasta of missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription SZ-16 laθurusi pianus apanin. Schumacher's idea that NO-2 might be a forgery based on SZ-16 (p. 336) relied on his incorrect segmentation of that inscription, and can now be dismissed. The inscription does, however, appear to be incomplete.
Further references: Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 221.
Bibliography
| Franz 1958b | Leonhard Franz, "Eine Inschrift aus Cles", Der Schlern 32 (1958), 39–40. |
|---|---|
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
