IT-6: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|type_inscription=unknown | |type_inscription=unknown | ||
|sigla_mlr=96 | |sigla_mlr=96 | ||
|sigla_tm=653555 | |||
|checklevel=1 | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=zwei runde Steine mit Löchern (7019, 7112 Ghislanzoni, Castello) mit Strichen | |problem=zwei runde Steine mit Löchern (7019, 7112 Ghislanzoni, Castello) mit Strichen | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
First published in TIR. First print publication in {{bib|Salomon 2018}}: 93. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014. | First published in TIR. First print publication in {{bib|Salomon 2018}}: 93. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014. | ||
Images in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo), {{bib|Salomon | Images in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo), {{bib|Salomon 2018}}: 93, fig. 58 (drawing = drawing on this page). | ||
Length about 3.5 cm. Despite the unambiguous alpha {{c||A}}, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of "butterfly" san {{c||addŚ2}}, which is characteristic of [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/%C5%9A the Lepontic alphabet]. Cf. the somewhat similar arrangement of lines [[index::SR-11]] on another round, but much larger stone. See [[index::Non-script notational systems]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | Length about 3.5 cm. Despite the unambiguous alpha {{c||A}}, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of "butterfly" san {{c||addŚ2}}, which is characteristic of [http://www.univie.ac.at/lexlep/wiki/%C5%9A the Lepontic alphabet]. Cf. the somewhat similar arrangement of lines [[index::SR-11]] on another round, but much larger stone. See [[index::Non-script notational systems]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 8 November 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | aiθiu |
| Original script: |    
|
|
| |
| Object: | IT-6 stone (stone) |
| Position: | front |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.5 cm – 2 cm |
| Number of characters: | 3 – 5 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | engraved |
| Current condition: | complete |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Type: | unknown |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | MLR 96 TM 653555 |
Images
 Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - upper side.
|
 Object IT-6 stone with inscription IT-6 - axonometry.
|
 Inscription IT-6.
|
Commentary
First published in TIR. First print publication in Salomon 2018: 93. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Images in Tischer 2006: 215, fig. 13 (photo), MLR (photo), Salomon 2018: 93, fig. 58 (drawing = drawing on this page).
Length about 3.5 cm. Despite the unambiguous alpha , possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of "butterfly" san 
, which is characteristic of the Lepontic alphabet. Cf. the somewhat similar arrangement of lines SR-11 on another round, but much larger stone. See Non-script notational systems for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
