IT-6: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
|craftsmanship=engraved
|craftsmanship=engraved
|condition=complete
|condition=complete
|sigla_mlr=96
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=1
|problem=Lesung mit San als alternative reading?
|problem=Lesung mit San als alternative reading?; Literatur: MLR???
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.


Picture in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo).
Picture in {{bib|Tischer 2006}}: 215, fig. 13 (photo), {{bib|MLR}} (photo).


Despite the unambiguous {{c||A|d}}, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of the St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of the "butterfly San" {{c||addŚ2}} characteristic of Lepontic. Cp. [[index::SR-11]]. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
Despite the unambiguous {{c||A|d}}, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of the St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of the "butterfly San" {{c||addŚ2}} characteristic of Lepontic. Cp. [[index::SR-11]]. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 08:00, 15 July 2015

Inscription
Transliteration: aiθiu
Original script: U sI sΘ sI sA d

Object: IT-6 stone (stone)
Position: front
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Number of characters: 3 – 5
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: complete
Archaeological culture: La Tène [from object]
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: MLR 96

Images

Commentary

Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in July 2014.

Picture in Tischer 2006: 215, fig. 13 (photo), MLR (photo).

Despite the unambiguous A d, possibly non- or pseudo-script. The two vertical scratches on both sides of the St. Andrew's cross are very close to the latter, suggesting the shape of the "butterfly San" addŚ2 s characteristic of Lepontic. Cp. SR-11. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.

Bibliography