lauste: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Attested only once in this form; most probably a Raetic individual name in -{{p||e}}. the assumption that this is identical with {{w||lasta}} and/or {{w||lasθe}} is methodically questionable, since this would presuppose a monophthongisation that cannot be proved otherwise
Attested only once in this form; most probably a Raetic individual name in -{{p||e}}. The assumption that this is identical with {{w||lasta}} and/or {{w||lasθe}} is methodically highly questionable, since such an assumption would presuppose a monophthongisation that cannot be proved otherwise.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 18:07, 10 January 2018

Word
Language: Raetic
Word type: proper noun

Case: nominative
Number: singular

Meaning: 'Lauste'

Attestation: HU-5.1 (laustẹ) (1)

Commentary

Attested only once in this form; most probably a Raetic individual name in -e. The assumption that this is identical with lasta and/or lasθe is methodically highly questionable, since such an assumption would presuppose a monophthongisation that cannot be proved otherwise.