kusenkus: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|lemma=kusenku* | |lemma=kusenku* | ||
|analysis_morphemic=kusenku{{m|-s}} | |analysis_morphemic=kusenku{{m|-s(i)|-s}} | ||
|meaning='of/for Kusenku' | |meaning='of/for Kusenku' | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Dubious because of isolated {{w||kusen}} in [[index::UG-1.1]]. If | Dubious because of isolated {{w||kusen}} in [[index::UG-1.1]]. If so in [[index::CE-1.4]], a name in the benefactive genitive – possibly a theonym? | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:18, 11 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Case: | genitive |
| Number: | singular |
| Gender: | masculine |
|
| |
| Morphemic analysis: | kusenku-s |
| Meaning: | 'of/for Kusenku' |
|
| |
| Attestation: | none (0) |
Commentary
Dubious because of isolated kusen in UG-1.1. If so in CE-1.4, a name in the benefactive genitive – possibly a theonym?
