WE-5.2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|reading=ui | |reading=ui | ||
|reading_original={{c|I|I}}{{c|U|U2}} | |reading_original={{c|I|I}}{{c|U|U2}} | ||
|direction=ambiguous | |direction=ambiguous | ||
| | |letter_height_min=1.0 cm | ||
| | |sign_number=2 | ||
|word_number= | |word_number=0 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|object=WE-5 | |meaning=unknown | ||
|object=WE-5 potsherd | |||
|position=inside, rim | |position=inside, rim | ||
|craftsmanship= | |craftsmanship=incised before firing | ||
|condition= | |condition=complete | ||
| | |sigla_mlr=73 a | ||
|checklevel= | |sigla_tm=653650 | ||
|checklevel=1 | |||
|problem=Verweis | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | |||
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | |||
Probably non-script. See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:33, 13 December 2021
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ui |
| Original script: |  
|
|
| |
| Object: | WE-5 potsherd (pottery) (Inscriptions: WE-5.1, WE-5.2) |
| Position: | inside, rim |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.0 cm |
| Number of characters: | 2 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised before firing |
| Current condition: | complete |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène B [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | 4th–3rd centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | typology [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | MLR 73 a TM 653650 |
Commentary
Unpublished. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
