VN-14.1: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
|craftsmanship=engraved
|craftsmanship=engraved
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|condition=damaged, fragmentary
|sigla_tm=653629
|source=Schumacher 2004: 324
|source=Schumacher 2004: 324
|checklevel=2
|checklevel=2
Line 23: Line 24:
First edited in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 324.
First edited in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 324.


Picture in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 13,6 (drawing).
Image in {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: Taf. 13,6 (drawing).


Length of the remains 3 cm. The scratches are very slight, barring the pronounced separators, but the reading is unambiguous. upper tips of the letters are missing, where the object is broken. No interpretation suggests itself.
Length of the remains 3 cm. The scratches are very slight, barring the pronounced separators, but the reading is unambiguous. The upper tips of the letters are missing, where the object is broken. No interpretation suggests itself.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 23:32, 13 December 2021

Inscription
Transliteration: ]a·φe·ki
Original script: I sK spunctuation7 sE sΦ4 spunctuation7 sA5 s[

Object: VN-14 bone (bone)
(Inscriptions: VN-14.1, VN-14.2)
Position: outside
Script: North Italic script
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 1.8 cm
Number of letters: 5
Number of characters: 7
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: damaged, fragmentary
Date of inscription: 3rd–1st centuries BC [from object]
Date derived from: archaeological context [from object]

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: TM 653629
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 324

Images

Commentary

First edited in Schumacher 2004: 324.

Image in Schumacher 2004: Taf. 13,6 (drawing).

Length of the remains 3 cm. The scratches are very slight, barring the pronounced separators, but the reading is unambiguous. The upper tips of the letters are missing, where the object is broken. No interpretation suggests itself.

Bibliography