Search results

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Results 1 – 52 of 618
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

Page title matches

  • ...that given by {{bib|Lattes 1901}}: p. 1137 in the publication of slab A's inscription. Lattes, citing from Francesco Pellegrini's letters (written in 1896), writ ...and language. Due to the clearly Etruscoid character of the language, the inscription was used as evidence for the connection of Raetic with Etruscan, but was ev
    15 KB (2,445 words) - 23:43, 18 March 2020

Page text matches

  • ..._object=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[object::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}}) ...t_plain=|sort=sortform|format=list|limit=800|default=}} ({{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[script::unknown]]|sort=sortform|format=count}})
    2 KB (284 words) - 23:03, 17 May 2016
  • {{inscription ...isible (height about 7.5 cm), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    655 bytes (80 words) - 20:40, 8 November 2021
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Us||Ud]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::U2s||U2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (470 words) - 01:16, 27 January 2016
  • {{inscription ...are left (height about 5 cm). No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    673 bytes (83 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ps||Pd]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::P2s||P2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (434 words) - 00:59, 27 January 2016
  • [[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::Ls||Ld]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain=; |[[Category:Inscription]][[character_variant::L2s||L2d]][[sortdate::<-225]];?coordinate;?text_plain
    3 KB (358 words) - 01:03, 27 January 2016
  • {{inscription ...ture of [[index::AK-1.17]]?), no reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    722 bytes (92 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
  • ...c}}: 397 with fig. (an attempt of reading and interpretation of the entire inscription).
    1 KB (197 words) - 15:16, 17 September 2015
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.2 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-27.2|another, identical inscription]].
    768 bytes (93 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...9.2 cm), but no reading can be offered. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription.
    756 bytes (99 words) - 20:38, 8 November 2021
  • The inscription VR-5 was included in the Raetic corpus by {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 172, 340 [[Category:Non-inscription]]
    509 bytes (70 words) - 14:46, 29 June 2020
  • {{inscription ...belong to [[index::AK-1.12]]. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    816 bytes (104 words) - 20:37, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...le despite corrosion. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.2|another, identical inscription]].
    770 bytes (100 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...white inlay, is left. The object bears [[index::SZ-37.1|another, identical inscription]].
    764 bytes (102 words) - 23:17, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.1|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    771 bytes (95 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...bowl]]), {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} included the inscription twice: SA-81 is the inscription as published by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, SA-101 as he saw it at the [[index::
    994 bytes (127 words) - 21:42, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...7 potsherd|potsherd]], mentions only [[index::SZ-27.1|the other, identical inscription]] on the [[index::SZ-27 potsherd|object]].
    787 bytes (105 words) - 23:16, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...iption length 2.4 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-43.2|another, identical inscription]] on the opposite side.
    798 bytes (101 words) - 23:18, 13 December 2021
  • Concordance of TIR [[:Category:Inscription|inscription]] sigla with those used in the {{bib|PID|Pre-Italic Dialects of Italy (PID) {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]]|mainlabel=TIR|sort=sortform|?sigla_pid=PID|?sigla_ir=IR|?sigla_mancini=LI
    847 bytes (111 words) - 18:22, 6 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...t traces before and after it. No reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    832 bytes (116 words) - 20:34, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...entification with {{bib|PID}} 207 b, and assigned the sigla SA-50 a to the inscription published in {{bib|PID}}, SA-50 b to the one seen by him.
    1 KB (144 words) - 21:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....1 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....2 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    587 bytes (74 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|sort=sortform|format=ol|?text_plain=|limit=1000}}
    121 bytes (14 words) - 03:33, 12 August 2013
  • {{inscription ...rranged into a Lepontic "butterfly" san. Possibly the remains of a younger inscription. In any case, no reading can be offered.
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:35, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ....4 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-92.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:27, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ....9 cm. Well legible despite corrosion. Another, [[index::SZ-93.1|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    610 bytes (77 words) - 23:28, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...the frame lines, possibly followed by a frame line marking the end of the inscription.
    1 KB (172 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...eceded by {{c||S|d}}. No further reading can be offered. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    900 bytes (122 words) - 20:36, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...osion, but the reading {{w||þine}} is supported by [[index::SZ-33|the same inscription occurring in the same place on another iron farming implement]].
    936 bytes (124 words) - 21:52, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...an be seen in the upper area (under {{c||U5|d}} through {{c||E|d}} of that inscription). Between these two lines, the faint traces of possibly intentional scratch
    952 bytes (134 words) - 22:01, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-9 in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|Schumacher 2004|2004}}.
    633 bytes (75 words) - 20:43, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...are fairly well distinguishable, though the white inlay is misleading. The inscription features additional little crosses similar to [[index::SZ-44.1]].
    942 bytes (123 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...r and connected with a horizontal line on top, indicate the presence of an inscription (length 79 cm). No reading can be offered.
    937 bytes (130 words) - 20:41, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ve the preserved ones; in light of the above considerations concerning the inscription's original length, we prefer {{p||e}} as the typical auslaut of Raetic indi
    2 KB (391 words) - 21:19, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 7.0 cm. The inscription is in excellent condition, the reading is unambiguous.
    1 KB (167 words) - 21:39, 8 November 2021
  • ...of the type Almgren 65 with a Raetic inscription. For fibulae with Raetic inscription see in particular ''Liste I: Almgren 65'' and table 2.
    653 bytes (99 words) - 14:36, 8 January 2015
  • {{inscription ...Raetic context and may be an import and/or indicate a recent date for the inscription.
    1 KB (215 words) - 21:50, 8 November 2021
  • {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    200 bytes (22 words) - 15:21, 28 February 2014
  • {{inscription Note that due to a misprint, the inscription is filed as AS-10 (the first of the two) in {{bib|Schumacher 1992}}/{{bib|S
    749 bytes (96 words) - 20:44, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...ft {{c||I}}, incised before burning, is part of the ornamentation, not the inscription.
    706 bytes (96 words) - 21:48, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription ...w||upi}} supports the reading. Very probably an [[index::SZ-88.2|identical inscription]] on the other side.
    766 bytes (101 words) - 23:26, 13 December 2021
  • $
    {{#ask:[[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]]|?text_plain=|format=ul|limit=1000|sort=sortform}}
    219 bytes (26 words) - 12:35, 24 January 2014
  • ...axe]]|format=count}}x), mostly from [[index::Sanzeno]] ({{#ask: [[Category:Inscription]][[word::{{PAGENAME}}]][[object.site::Sanzeno]]|format=count}}x). {{c||L}} ...hasta in writing direction shortened). They are always accompanied by the inscription {{w||uθiiθi}}.
    3 KB (447 words) - 13:41, 12 May 2016
  • {{inscription ...valley. Also the shape of the sherd suggests that on the upright bowl the inscription was seen as shown in the drawing.
    1 KB (209 words) - 21:02, 8 November 2021
  • {{inscription Inscription length 2.1 cm. The left hasta of Alpha is shortened, cp. [[index::SZ-44.2]]
    733 bytes (93 words) - 23:20, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription Length 1.9 cm. The object bears [[index::SZ-79.1|an identical inscription on the opposite side]].
    693 bytes (88 words) - 23:25, 13 December 2021
  • {{inscription ...m, are small compared to other Raetic rock inscriptions. Possibly a pseudo-inscription.
    1 KB (162 words) - 20:39, 8 November 2021
  • |title=L'Inscription Rétique de Castelcies
    228 bytes (26 words) - 15:21, 16 January 2014
  • {{inscription ...e at the right breaking edge, at a distance of about a centimeter from the inscription.
    765 bytes (103 words) - 21:15, 8 November 2021

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)