Search results

...near the ''Reiferhof'' is in direct relation to the [[index::chronological classification| Iron age]] settlement located on the [[index::Albanbühel]].

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the ceramic frag

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the ceramic frag

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the simpulum mus

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the handle fragm

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the statuette mu

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the axe must als

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the axe must als

...n age period]], i.e. from the 5th century BC to the [[index::chronological classification|Roman period]] (cp. {{bib|Fogolari 1960}}: 269). Therefore the [[SZ-38 knif

...appearance of characters points to a dating to the [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]].<br>Probably first published in {{bib|IR}}: 278, No. 54.<

|problem=current location; classification, arch. type ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...n]] of the bone points can be supposed for the late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). On the [[index::Ganglegg]

...n]] of the bone points can be supposed for the late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] (cp. {{bib|Gamper 2006}}: 145). Concerning the [[NO-17 bo

...m the late Hallstatt period to the beginning of the [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] (cp. {{bib|Wieser 1909}}: 198–199). The detailed contex

|problem=current location; classification, arch. type ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification, arch. type ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification, arch. type ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification: cup or beaker (coppa or bicchiere); arch. type: tipo 1a or tipo 1b ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification: cup or beaker (coppa or bicchiere); arch. type: tipo 1a or tipo 1b ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification: cup or beaker (coppa or bicchiere); arch. type: tipo 1a or tipo 1b; arch. ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

|problem=current location; classification: cup or beaker (coppa or bicchiere); arch. type: tipo 1a or tipo 1b ...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...ra'') was discovered in the settlements of the late [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] as well as it occurs more frequently as stray finds in th

...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...p. {{bib|Walde-Psenner 1976}}: 214). However it can be assumed the general chronological timeframe related to the Fritzens-Sanzeno culture, therefore a date determi

...vations of 1912 and 1969 only few facts date to the [[index::chronological classification|III periodo atestino]]. The major part dates to the 4th–2nd centuries BC

...by a consecutive reference number. An introduction presenting options for classification and interpretation of the material will follow in time. See, in the meantim | [[index::chronological classification|La Tène period]] according to the archaeological context