NO-2: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}: Abb. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}).
Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1958b}}: Abb. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}).


The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w||pianusapau}} in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c||U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 proposed {{w||pianusapan}} with the hasta of {{c||N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] {{w||laθuru}} {{w||sipianu}} {{w||sapanin}}. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable [[index::SZ-16]] suggests that the inscription might be either an archaic, but unsophisticated imitation (the sieve dates from the Roman period) or an outright forgery, in any case made by a person who knew [[index::SZ-16]] but was unable to read or understand it. (See {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 336.)
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While {{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}} read {{w||pianusapau}} in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c||U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 proposed {{w||pianusapan}} with the hasta of {{c||N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] {{w||laθurusi}} {{w||pianus}} {{w||apanin}}. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable [[index::SZ-16]] suggests that the inscription might be either an archaic, but unsophisticated imitation (the sieve dates from the Roman period) or an outright forgery, in any case made by a person who knew [[index::SZ-16]] but was unable to read or understand it. (See {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 336.)


Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221.
Further references: {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 15:52, 15 June 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: pianusapaụ
Original script: U2 sA sP2 sA sS sU2 sN sA5 sI sP2 s

Object: NO-2 sieve funnel ()
Position: outside
Script: North Italic script (Sanzeno alphabet)
Direction of writing: sinistroverse
Letter height: 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.4 cm
Number of letters: 10
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: engraved
Current condition: complete, restored
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: IR 75
LIR CL-2
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 150, 336

Commentary

First published in Franz 1958b. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.

Pictures in Franz 1958b: Abb. 2 (drawing), Mayr 1960f: 389 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing = LIR).

The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While Franz read pianusapau in spite of the oddly misaligned U2 s, Mayr 1960f: 389 proposed pianusapan with the hasta of N s missing due to a mistake by the writer, citing as a parallel the inscription SZ-16 laθurusi pianus apanin. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable SZ-16 suggests that the inscription might be either an archaic, but unsophisticated imitation (the sieve dates from the Roman period) or an outright forgery, in any case made by a person who knew SZ-16 but was unable to read or understand it. (See Schumacher 2004: 336.)

Further references: Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 221.

Bibliography

Franz 1958b Leonhard Franz, "Eine Inschrift aus Cles", Der Schlern 32 (1958), 39–40.
IR Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306.
LIR Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes)