HU-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|sigla_mancini=INC-1 | |sigla_mancini=INC-1 | ||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=1 | ||
|problem=see below -> notes | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | ||
The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
Notes: | |||
First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 1. Scratched after firing. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 11:55, 24 June 2014
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ?(?)u |
| Original script: |   or  
|
|
| |
| Object: | HU-2 potsherd () |
| Position: | foot, inside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.2 cm |
| Number of characters: | 2 – 3 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 69 LIR INC-1 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 197 |
Commentary
First published in IR. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in IR (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = LIR).
The scratches can be arranged to read ua or uiθ – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
Notes: First published in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442, fig. 1. Scratched after firing.
