BZ-28: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|craftsmanship=engraved | |craftsmanship=engraved | ||
|condition=damaged, fragmentary, restored | |condition=damaged, fragmentary, restored | ||
|sigla_tm=653546 | |||
|checklevel=2 | |checklevel=2 | ||
|problem=position/orientation, Link field name | |problem=position/orientation, Link field name |
Latest revision as of 19:58, 8 November 2021
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ]?aịṇ[ |
Original script: | ]?[ |
| |
Object: | BZ-28 fragment (bronze) |
Position: | outside |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 1.2 cm |
Number of letters: | 4 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | damaged, fragmentary, restored |
Date of inscription: | 2nd half of the 5th century–1st century BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | typology [from object] |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | TM 653546 |
Images
Object BZ-28 fragment with inscription BZ-28.
|
Commentary
Not previously published. Autopsied by TIR in November 2014.
Length of the remains about 3 cm. The inscription is included into the Raetic corpus for the only clearly legible letter , which appears in the same shape as in BZ-27. When it comes to the other lines, the reading is impeded not only by cracks and surface damage, but also by a sloppily applied white inlay. The leftmost character, whose hasta is clearly longer than the inlay suggests, may well be ; in this case, the single vertical scratch before it must be . To the right of , two scratches cut short in the bottom can be seen. See Non-script notational systems for information on the marks on those fragments of helmets from the find which have not been included.