BZ-1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Franz 1959}}: Taf. 3,5 (drawing), {{bib|Lunz 1974}}: Taf. 73,1 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LVI, fig. b; and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | Pictures in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 2 (drawing), {{bib|Franz 1959}}: Taf. 3,5 (drawing), {{bib|Lunz 1974}}: Taf. 73,1 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LVI, fig. b; and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | ||
{{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}} mentions remains of an inscription and only two characters. The orientation of the inscription is ambiguous – either {{c|A|A3|d}} or {{c|N}} is written upside-down. Above representation chooses the sinistroverse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight {{c||E|d}}). The {{c||Θ}} in {{p||θ}}]{{w||anu}} read by {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} is not verifiable: The stroke in question (see his drawing) is not as deep as the others and may not be intentional. | {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b|Torggler-Wöß}} mentions remains of an inscription and only two characters. The orientation of the inscription is ambiguous – either {{c|A|A3|d}} or {{c|N}} is written upside-down. Above representation chooses the sinistroverse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight {{c||E|d}}). The {{c||Θ}} in {{p||θ}}]{{w||anu}} read by {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} is not verifiable: The stroke in question (see his drawing) is not as deep as the others and may not be intentional. | ||
Further references: {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 f. | Further references: {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 f. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 11:25, 24 June 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ]anu[ |
Original script: | ][ |
| |
Object: | BZ-1 potsherd (pottery) |
Position: | bottom, outside |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Letter height: | 1.61.6 cm <br /> – 2.0 cm |
Number of letters: | 3 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | incised |
Current condition: | unknown |
Archaeological culture: | La Tène A, La Tène B [from object] |
Date of inscription: | middle of the 5th–middle of the 3rd centuries BC [from object] |
Date derived from: | typology, archaeological context [from object] |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 102 LIR BZ-21 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 178 |
Commentary
First published in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442 f. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442, fig. 2 (drawing), Franz 1959: Taf. 3,5 (drawing), Lunz 1974: Taf. 73,1 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. LVI, fig. b; and drawing = LIR).
Torggler-Wöß mentions remains of an inscription and only two characters. The orientation of the inscription is ambiguous – either or is written upside-down. Above representation chooses the sinistroverse reading with straight ; compare BZ-2 for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down (and straight ). The in θ]anu read by Mancini is not verifiable: The stroke in question (see his drawing) is not as deep as the others and may not be intentional.
Further references: Franz 1959: 228 f.
Bibliography
Franz 1959 | Leonhard Franz, "Rätische Inschriften im Innsbrucker Landesmuseum", Der Schlern 33 (1959), 228–229. |
---|---|
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
Lunz 1974 | Reimo Lunz, Studien zur End-Bronzezeit und älteren Eisenzeit im Südalpenraum, Firenze: Sansoni 1974. |