uθiiθi: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Recurring on a number of iron objects from [[index::Sanzeno]]. On scythe rings ([[index::SZ-44 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-45 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-46 scythe ring]]), the inscription is accompanied by {{w||la}} on the opposite side of the object; on [[index::SZ-50 chisel|the chisel]] and [[index::SZ-51 knife|the knife]] it stands alone. It runs in different directions ([[index::SZ-45.1]] and [[index::SZ-46.1]] vs. [[index::SZ-44.1]], [[index::SZ-50]] and [[index::SZ-51]]). Merely decoration, or possibly a manufacturer's mark? See [[index:: | Recurring on a number of iron objects from [[index::Sanzeno]]. On scythe rings ([[index::SZ-44 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-45 scythe ring]], [[index::SZ-46 scythe ring]]), the inscription is accompanied by {{w||la}} on the opposite side of the object; on [[index::SZ-50 chisel|the chisel]] and [[index::SZ-51 knife|the knife]] it stands alone. It runs in different directions ([[index::SZ-45.1]] and [[index::SZ-46.1]] vs. [[index::SZ-44.1]], [[index::SZ-50]] and [[index::SZ-51]]). Merely decoration, or possibly a manufacturer's mark? See [[index::Non-script notational systems|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 15:18, 23 July 2015
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | unknown |
| Word type: | unknown |
|
| |
|
| |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Attestation: | SZ-44.1 (uθiiθi), SZ-45.1 (uθiiθi), SZ-46.1 (uθiiθi), SZ-50 (uθiiθi), SZ-51 (uθiiθ[) (5) |
Commentary
Recurring on a number of iron objects from Sanzeno. On scythe rings (SZ-44 scythe ring, SZ-45 scythe ring, SZ-46 scythe ring), the inscription is accompanied by la on the opposite side of the object; on the chisel and the knife it stands alone. It runs in different directions (SZ-45.1 and SZ-46.1 vs. SZ-44.1, SZ-50 and SZ-51). Merely decoration, or possibly a manufacturer's mark? See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
