HU-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Martin Braun (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |||
|object=HU-2 potsherd | |object=HU-2 potsherd | ||
|position=foot, inside | |position=foot, inside | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
|sigla_mancini=INC-1 | |sigla_mancini=INC-1 | ||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|IR}}. | First published in {{bib|IR}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | |||
The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 20:16, 14 March 2014
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ?(?)u |
| Original script: |   or  
|
|
| |
| Object: | HU-2 potsherd () |
| Position: | foot, inside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.2 cm |
| Number of characters: | 2 – 3 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | complete, restored |
| Date of inscription: | |
| Date derived from: | |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 69 LIR INC-1 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 197 |
Commentary
First published in IR. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in IR (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = LIR).
The scratches can be arranged to read ua or uiθ – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
