SZ-21: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|word_number=0 | |word_number=0 | ||
|line_number=0 | |line_number=0 | ||
|script=unknown | |script=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |||
|object=SZ-20 statuette | |object=SZ-20 statuette | ||
|position=upper area | |position=upper area | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Picture in {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | Picture in {{bib|LIR}} (drawing). | ||
Along the edge on the animal's back, apparently a mere succession of short strokes and angles: {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, from {{bib|PID|Conway}}'s drawing, read {{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c||I}}{{c||punctuation7}}{{c||V}}{{c||A}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||N}}{{c||P2}} {{w||pnippipiav.i.}}. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggested possible readings {{w||il.nuapiśav.i.}} or {{w||la.nuep.mav.i.}}. Despite the appropriately word-final occurrence of Venetic {{c|H|H4}}, the stokes are more likely to be decorative, probably indicating a mane (see [[index::SZ-20]] on the question of which animal we are looking at). | Along the edge on the animal's back, length about 4 cm, apparently a mere succession of short strokes and angles: {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, from {{bib|PID|Conway}}'s drawing, read {{c|punctuation|punctuation7}}{{c||I}}{{c||punctuation7}}{{c||V}}{{c||A}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||P2}}{{c||P2}}{{c||I}}{{c||N}}{{c||P2}} {{w||pnippipiav.i.}}. {{bib|LIR|Mancini}}, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggested possible readings {{w||il.nuapiśav.i.}} or {{w||la.nuep.mav.i.}}. Despite the appropriately word-final occurrence of Venetic {{c|H|H4}}, the stokes are more likely to be decorative, probably indicating a mane (see [[index::SZ-20]] on the question of which animal we are looking at). | ||
Due to a misunderstanding by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, inscriptions [[index::SZ-20]] and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects. | Due to a misunderstanding by {{bib|PID|Whatmough}}, inscriptions [[index::SZ-20]] and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects. |
Revision as of 23:47, 16 March 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ? |
Original script: | ? |
| |
Object: | SZ-20 statuette () |
Position: | upper area"upper area" is not in the list (front, back, top, bottom, inside, outside, neck, shoulder, foot, handle, ...) of allowed values for the "position" property. |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | unknown |
Craftsmanship: | embossed |
Current condition: | restored |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | PID 202 LIR SA-16 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 137 |
Commentary
First published in PID. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Picture in LIR (drawing).
Along the edge on the animal's back, length about 4 cm, apparently a mere succession of short strokes and angles: Whatmough, from Conway's drawing, read pnippipiav.i.. Mancini, despite conceding that the inscription is "in realtà inutilizzabile", suggested possible readings il.nuapiśav.i. or la.nuep.mav.i.. Despite the appropriately word-final occurrence of Venetic , the stokes are more likely to be decorative, probably indicating a mane (see SZ-20 on the question of which animal we are looking at).
Due to a misunderstanding by Whatmough, inscriptions SZ-20 and SZ-21 were thought to be inscribed on two different, though similar, objects.
Further references: NRIE 98, Battisti 1944: 230.
Bibliography
Battisti 1944 | Carlo Battisti, "Osservazioni sulla lingua delle iscrizioni nell'alfabeto etrusco settentrionale di Bolzano", Studi Etruschi 18 (1944), 199–236. |
---|---|
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |