BZ-1: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|word_number=0 | |word_number=0 | ||
|line_number=1 | |line_number=1 | ||
|script= | |script=unknown | ||
|language=unknown | |language=unknown | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|object=BZ-1 potsherd | |object=BZ-1 potsherd | ||
|position=bottom | |position=bottom, outside | ||
|craftsmanship=incised | |craftsmanship=incised | ||
|condition=unknown | |condition=unknown | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 f. | First published in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: 228 f. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Franz 1959}}: Taf. 3,5 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LVI, fig. b; and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | |||
The orientation of the inscription is ambiguous – either {{c|A|A3|d}} or {{c|N}} is written upside-down. Above representation chooses the sinistroverse reading with straight {{c||N}}; compare [[index::BZ-2]] for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down {{c||N2|d}} (and straight {{c||E|d}}). The {{c||Θ}} in {{p||θ}}]{{w||anu}} read by {{bib|LIR|Mancini}} is not verifiable: The stroke in question (see his drawing) is not as deep as the others and may not be intentional. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Revision as of 15:29, 13 March 2014
| Inscription | |
|---|---|
| Transliteration: | ]anu[ |
| Original script: | ]   [
|
|
| |
| Object: | BZ-1 potsherd (pottery) |
| Position: | bottom, outside |
| Script: | unknown |
| Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
| Letter height: | 1.61.6 cm <br /> – 2.0 cm |
| Number of letters: | 3 |
| Number of lines: | 1 |
| Craftsmanship: | incised |
| Current condition: | unknown |
| Archaeological culture: | La Tène A, La Tène B [from object] |
| Date of inscription: | middle of the 5th–middle of the 3rd centuries BC [from object] |
| Date derived from: | typology, archaeological context [from object] |
|
| |
| Language: | unknown |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Alternative sigla: | IR 102 LIR BZ-21 |
| Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 178 |
Commentary
First published in Franz 1959: 228 f. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in Franz 1959: Taf. 3,5 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. LVI, fig. b; and drawing = LIR).
The orientation of the inscription is ambiguous – either 
or is written upside-down. Above representation chooses the sinistroverse reading with straight ; compare BZ-2 for another inscription which might be read dextroverse with upside-down 
(and straight 
). The 
in θ]anu read by Mancini is not verifiable: The stroke in question (see his drawing) is not as deep as the others and may not be intentional.
Bibliography
| Franz 1959 | Leonhard Franz, "Rätische Inschriften im Innsbrucker Landesmuseum", Der Schlern 33 (1959), 228–229. |
|---|---|
| IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
| LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |
| Lunz 1974 | Reimo Lunz, Studien zur End-Bronzezeit und älteren Eisenzeit im Südalpenraum, Firenze: Sansoni 1974. |
