θaukis: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|number=singular | |number=singular | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|lemma= | |lemma=θauχ- | ||
|meaning=unknown | |meaning=unknown | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Formally, the word can be a genitive II in {{m||-s(i)|-s}}, well attested in Raetic. Its occurring together with a rare ablative ({{w||kleimunθeis}}) makes an interpretation as an ablative in {{m||-s}} equally feasible. In either case, the base is most likely to be an individual name ''θauki''. The connection with the two occurrences of the unclear sequence {{w||θauχ-}} is dubious. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:39, 11 February 2017
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | noun |
|
| |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Meaning: | unknown |
|
| |
| Paradigm: | θaukis (singular), θauχ- (2) |
| Attestation: | IT-5 (?:/]θ̣[ ]θ̣?kaịa[ ?/utiku:θaukịṣ/kleimunθeis/avaśuerasi:ihi) (1) |
Commentary
Formally, the word can be a genitive II in -s, well attested in Raetic. Its occurring together with a rare ablative (kleimunθeis) makes an interpretation as an ablative in -s equally feasible. In either case, the base is most likely to be an individual name θauki. The connection with the two occurrences of the unclear sequence θauχ- is dubious.
