valθikinu: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|case=nominative | |case=nominative | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|lemma=valθiki* | |lemma=valθiki-* | ||
|analysis_morphemic=valθiki{{m|-nu}} | |analysis_morphemic=valθiki{{m|-nu}} | ||
|meaning='son of Valθiki*' | |meaning='son of Valθiki-*' | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Patronym in {{m||-nu}}, attested only once. According to Untermann’s sensible analysis {{bib|Untermann 1961}}: 92 f., it is unlikely that this is derived as a whole from Venetic {{w||voltiχenei}} (Es 1) / {{w||voltiχnos|vo·l·tiχ//[n]o·s·}} (Es 8) – only the first elements ''volti''- ~ ''valθi''- correspond. {{bib|Schumacher 1998}}: 96 identifies -''ki''- with the ''k''-suffixes prevalent in the individual names in Roman inscriptions of the area of | Patronym in {{m||-nu}}, attested only once. According to Untermann’s sensible analysis ({{bib|Untermann 1961}}: 92 f.), it is unlikely that this is derived as a whole from Venetic {{w||voltiχenei}} (Es 1) / {{w||voltiχnos|vo·l·tiχ//[n]o·s·}} (Es 8) – only the first elements ''volti''- ~ ''valθi''- correspond. {{bib|Schumacher 1998}}: 96 identifies -''ki''- with the ''k''-suffixes prevalent in the individual names in Roman inscriptions of the area of Brescia ({{bib|Untermann 1961}} I: 103 f.). For the suffix cp. {{w||φutiχinu}}, ]''θiχinu'' ([[index::MA-20]]), as well as maybe {{w||velχanu}}, {{w||visteχanu}}. For the first element cp. {{w||valθe?nu}}. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 10 January 2018
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Case: | nominative |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Morphemic analysis: | valθiki-nu |
| Meaning: | 'son of Valθiki-*' |
|
| |
| Attestation: | MA-17 (klevieval·θikinuasua) (1) |
Commentary
Patronym in -nu, attested only once. According to Untermann’s sensible analysis (Untermann 1961: 92 f.), it is unlikely that this is derived as a whole from Venetic voltiχenei (Es 1) / vo·l·tiχ//[n]o·s· (Es 8) – only the first elements volti- ~ valθi- correspond. Schumacher 1998: 96 identifies -ki- with the k-suffixes prevalent in the individual names in Roman inscriptions of the area of Brescia (Untermann 1961 I: 103 f.). For the suffix cp. φutiχinu, ]θiχinu (MA-20), as well as maybe velχanu, visteχanu. For the first element cp. valθe?nu.
