lauste: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|case=nominative | |case=nominative | ||
|language=Raetic | |language=Raetic | ||
|lemma= | |lemma=lauste- | ||
|meaning=' | |meaning='Lauste' | ||
|checklevel=0 | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Attested only once in this form; most probably a Raetic individual name in -{{p||e}}. The assumption that this is identical with {{w||lasta}} and/or {{w||lasθe}} is methodically highly questionable, since such an assumption would presuppose a monophthongisation that cannot be proved otherwise. | |||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 10 January 2018
| Word | |
|---|---|
| Language: | Raetic |
| Word type: | proper noun |
|
| |
| Case: | nominative |
| Number: | singular |
|
| |
| Meaning: | 'Lauste' |
|
| |
| Attestation: | HU-5.1 (laustẹ) (1) |
Commentary
Attested only once in this form; most probably a Raetic individual name in -e. The assumption that this is identical with lasta and/or lasθe is methodically highly questionable, since such an assumption would presuppose a monophthongisation that cannot be proved otherwise.
