MA-2 antler: Difference between revisions
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Gudrun Bajc (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|type_object=unidentifiable | |type_object=unidentifiable | ||
|material=antler | |material=antler | ||
|dimension=length | |dimension=MA-2 antler + MA-3 antler:<br>length: 12.3 cm, width: 2.9 cm, height: 1 cm | ||
|dimension_max=12.3 cm | |||
|condition=fragmentary | |condition=fragmentary | ||
|sortdate=-200 | |sortdate=-200 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
|location=Museo Nazionale Atestino | |location=Museo Nazionale Atestino | ||
|inventory_number=MNA 58811 | |inventory_number=MNA 58811 | ||
|source=Pellegrini 1918: 185 | |source=Pellegrini 1918: 185 [No. 13], fig. 20; Gambacurta et al. 2002: 189 [cat. No. 22.3]; Nothdurfter 2002: 1148 [list 3, No. 5] | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=5 | ||
|problem=Autopsie ausstehend; Abgleich mit MA-3 | |||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
Fragment of an antler point.<br>The whole object is broken in three sections and now it is fragmentary, at which the present object is the larger one. The fragment fits to [[index::MA-3 antler]] like the figure indicates (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 185, fig. 20).<br>An [[index::MA-2|inscription]] from left to right.<br>After the accidental finding of one [[index::MA-10|antler]] an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175).<br>According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from [[index::Magrè]] dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. {{bib|Gambacurta 2002b}}: 122 and in consequence {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 188).<br>Because of the character of the find place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from [[index::Magrè]] has also a votive importance.<br>The recently released study by Marchesini indicates the antler fragment with the siglum MLR 60. The presented object in the photo in Marchesini's study shows only [[MA-2 antler]], therefore in contrast to the drawing given by Pellegrini, only one part of the entire antler. Cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 93 [MLR 60]. The photo of MLR 60 (= [[MA-2 antler]]) given by Marchesini as well as the drawing given in {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 189 [n. 22.3] | Fragment of an antler point.<br>The whole object is broken in three sections and now it is fragmentary, at which the present object is the larger one. The fragment fits to [[index::MA-3 antler]] like the figure indicates (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 185 [No. 13], fig. 20).<br>An [[index::MA-2|inscription]] from left to right.<br>After the accidental finding of one [[index::MA-10 antler|antler]] an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175).<br>According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from [[index::Magrè]] dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. {{bib|Gambacurta 2002b}}: 122 and in consequence {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 188).<br>Because of the character of the find place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from [[index::Magrè]] has also a votive importance.<br>The recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by Marchesini indicates the [[MA-2 antler|antler fragment]] with the siglum "MLR 60", an autopsy was effected. The presented object in the photo in Marchesini's study shows only [[MA-2 antler]], therefore in contrast to the drawing given by Pellegrini, only one part of the entire antler. Cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 93 [MLR 60]. The photo of "MLR 60" (= [[MA-2 antler]]) given by Marchesini as well as the drawing given in {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 189 [n. 22.3] are identical.<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography). | ||
{{sig | {{sig | ||
|user=Sindy Kluge | |user=Sindy Kluge | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, 29 October 2015
Commentary
Fragment of an antler point.
The whole object is broken in three sections and now it is fragmentary, at which the present object is the larger one. The fragment fits to MA-3 antler like the figure indicates (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 185 [No. 13], fig. 20).
An inscription from left to right.
After the accidental finding of one antler an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 175).
According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from Magrè dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. Gambacurta 2002b: 122 and in consequence Gambacurta et al. 2002: 188).
Because of the character of the find place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from Magrè has also a votive importance.
The recently released study about the Raetic inscriptions by Marchesini indicates the antler fragment with the siglum "MLR 60", an autopsy was effected. The presented object in the photo in Marchesini's study shows only MA-2 antler, therefore in contrast to the drawing given by Pellegrini, only one part of the entire antler. Cp. MLR: 93 [MLR 60]. The photo of "MLR 60" (= MA-2 antler) given by Marchesini as well as the drawing given in Gambacurta et al. 2002: 189 [n. 22.3] are identical.
So far not autopsied by the Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography).
Bibliography
| Gambacurta 2002b | Giovanna Gambacurta, "Manufatti iscritti in osso o corno", in: Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), Akeo. I tempi della scrittura. Veneti antichi: alfabeti e documenti, 121–126. |
|---|---|
| Gambacurta et al. 2002 | Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), "Catalogo. Veneti antichi. Alfabeti e documenti", in: Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), Akeo. I tempi della scrittura. Veneti antichi: alfabeti e documenti, 157–275. |
