MA-4 antler: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
|type_object=unidentifiable
|type_object=unidentifiable
|material=antler
|material=antler
|dimension=length 4.5 cm
|dimension=length: 5.2 cm, width: 2.2 cm, height: 9 mm
|dimension_max=5.2 cm
|condition=fragmentary
|condition=fragmentary
|sortdate=-200
|sortdate=-200
Line 13: Line 14:
|sortdate_find=1912
|sortdate_find=1912
|location=Museo Nazionale Atestino
|location=Museo Nazionale Atestino
|inventory_number=none
|inventory_number=MNA 58808
|source=Pellegrini 1918: 189 (No. 20) fig. 27; Nothdurfter 2002: 1148 (list 3, No. 5)
|source=Pellegrini 1918: 189 [No. 20] fig. 27; Nothdurfter 2002: 1148 [list 3, No. 5]
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=5
|problem=inventory number??
|problem=inventory number??, Autopsie ausstehend, Überprüfung der fraglichen Punkte: Marchesini, Morandi etc.
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
Fragment of an antler point.<br>The fragment fits to [[index::MA-15 antler]] like the figure indicates (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 189, fig. 27). The present fragment is the smaller one.<br>Both fragments charred; the middle section missing as well as the right side.<br>Due to the fragmentary state of the antler fragment the beginning of the [[index::MA-4|inscription]] is also missing.<br>After the accidental finding of one [[index::MA-10|antler]] an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175).<br>According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from Magrè dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. {{bib|Gambacurta 2002b}}: 122 and in consequence {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 188).<br>Because of the character of the find place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from Magrè has also a votive importance.<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography).<br>''S.K.''
Fragment of an antler point.<br>The fragment fits to [[index::MA-15 antler]] as the figure reproduced by Pellegrini indicates (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 189 [No. 20], fig. 27). The [[MA-4 antler|present fragment]] is the smaller one.<br>Both fragments charred; the middle section missing as well as the right side.<br>Due to the fragmentary state of the antler fragment the beginning of the [[index::MA-4|inscription]] is also missing.<br>After the accidental finding of one [[index::MA-10 antler|antler]] an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175).<br>According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from [[index::Magrè]] dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. {{bib|Gambacurta 2002b}}: 122 and in consequence {{bib|Gambacurta et al. 2002}}: 188).<br>Because of the character of the finding place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from [[index::Magrè]] has also a votive importance.<br>The inventory number given above refers to the indication made by Marchesini (cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 80 [MLR 47]). However Marchesini does not autopsied the [[MA-4 antler|present fragment]] and cites only the indications given in the earlier literature, i.e. {{bib|PID}}, {{bib|Morandi 1999}} and {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}. But in the earlier studies was not stated an inventory number related to the [[MA-4 antler|present fragment]], therefore this information is doubtful. Moreover, the same inventory number is related to [[index::MA-8 antler|another antler fragment]] in Marchesini's study (cp. {{bib|MLR}}: 92 [MLR 59]; in the ''{{SITENAME}}'': [[index::MA-8 antler]]). Despite the drawing and reading of the entire inscription given in Pellegrini (cp. {{bib|Pellegrini 1918}}: 189 [No. 20], fig. 27), Whatmough separates the two fragments and indicates two different inscriptions with a particular number (cp. {{bib|PID}}: 37–38 [No. 223] and {{bib|PID}}: 44 [No. 235]. Schumacher follows the indications given in the PID (cp. {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 162, [[index::MA-4]] and {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 164, [[index::MA-15]]). However Morandi combines the both fragments as indicated by Pellegrini, whereas he mentiones that "''non reperibile nel Museo di Este l'altro frammento con due lettere figurante nello stesso disegno della edizione di Notizie degli Scavi''" (cp. {{bib|Morandi 1999}}: 81 [No. 45]). Although Marchesini refers to the study by Morandi, she ignores the connection of both fragments. Therefore, on one side is indicated with number "MLR 47" the entire indication as given by Pellegrini and repeated by Morandi, moreover "MLR 47" is related to number 223 of the PID and [[index::MA-4]] of Schumacher, on the other side she listes with number "MLR 67" the other fragment with two letters again, whereas she refers to number 235 of the PID and [[index::MA-15]] of Schumacher.<br>So far not autopsied by the ''Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum''. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography).
{{sig
|user=Sindy Kluge
}}
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Latest revision as of 14:06, 29 October 2015

Object
Classification: unidentifiable
Material: antler
Size: length: 5.2 cm, width: 2.2 cm, height: 9 mm
Condition: fragmentary
Date: 3rd–2nd centuries BC
Date derived from: archaeological context

Site: Magrè (fraction of: Schio, Vicenza, Veneto, Italy)
Field name: Castello
Archaeological context: 3rd stratum near the medieval tower
(Objects: MA-1 antler, MA-2 antler, MA-3 antler, MA-4 antler, MA-5 antler, MA-7 antler, MA-8 antler, MA-9 antler, MA-11 antler, MA-13 antler, MA-14 antler, MA-15 antler, MA-16 antler, MA-17 antler, MA-18 antler, MA-19 antler, MA-20 antler, MA-21 antler, MA-23 antler, MA-24 ingot)
Coordinates (approx.): 45° 42' 21.60" N, 11° 20' 52.80" E [from site]
Find date: 1912
Find circumstances: excavation
Current location: Museo Nazionale Atestino
Inventory Nr.: MNA 58808

Inscription: MA-4 (]eiluke[(?)?]śu)

Sources: Pellegrini 1918: 189 [No. 20] fig. 27
Nothdurfter 2002: 1148 [list 3, No. 5]

Commentary

Fragment of an antler point.
The fragment fits to MA-15 antler as the figure reproduced by Pellegrini indicates (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 189 [No. 20], fig. 27). The present fragment is the smaller one.
Both fragments charred; the middle section missing as well as the right side.
Due to the fragmentary state of the antler fragment the beginning of the inscription is also missing.
After the accidental finding of one antler an official governmental excavation was started. The major part of the findings was discovered at the 3rd stratum near the medieval tower on the hill (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 175).
According to Pellegrini the whole antler group from Magrè dates to the Este culture - Este IV - and due to the archaic appearance of the characters the antlers date to the first half of this period, therefore to the 4th century BC (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 175–176, 206). Gambacurta however dates the entire group to the 3rd–2nd centuries BC (cp. Gambacurta 2002b: 122 and in consequence Gambacurta et al. 2002: 188).
Because of the character of the finding place which can definitely interpreted as ritual place, the entire antler group from Magrè has also a votive importance.
The inventory number given above refers to the indication made by Marchesini (cp. MLR: 80 [MLR 47]). However Marchesini does not autopsied the present fragment and cites only the indications given in the earlier literature, i.e. PID, Morandi 1999 and Schumacher 2004. But in the earlier studies was not stated an inventory number related to the present fragment, therefore this information is doubtful. Moreover, the same inventory number is related to another antler fragment in Marchesini's study (cp. MLR: 92 [MLR 59]; in the Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum: MA-8 antler). Despite the drawing and reading of the entire inscription given in Pellegrini (cp. Pellegrini 1918: 189 [No. 20], fig. 27), Whatmough separates the two fragments and indicates two different inscriptions with a particular number (cp. PID: 37–38 [No. 223] and PID: 44 [No. 235]. Schumacher follows the indications given in the PID (cp. Schumacher 2004: 162, MA-4 and Schumacher 2004: 164, MA-15). However Morandi combines the both fragments as indicated by Pellegrini, whereas he mentiones that "non reperibile nel Museo di Este l'altro frammento con due lettere figurante nello stesso disegno della edizione di Notizie degli Scavi" (cp. Morandi 1999: 81 [No. 45]). Although Marchesini refers to the study by Morandi, she ignores the connection of both fragments. Therefore, on one side is indicated with number "MLR 47" the entire indication as given by Pellegrini and repeated by Morandi, moreover "MLR 47" is related to number 223 of the PID and MA-4 of Schumacher, on the other side she listes with number "MLR 67" the other fragment with two letters again, whereas she refers to number 235 of the PID and MA-15 of Schumacher.
So far not autopsied by the Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum. The indications follow the information given in literature (cp. below the bibliography).

S.K.

Bibliography

Gambacurta 2002b Giovanna Gambacurta, "Manufatti iscritti in osso o corno", in: Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), Akeo. I tempi della scrittura. Veneti antichi: alfabeti e documenti, 121–126.
Gambacurta et al. 2002 Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), "Catalogo. Veneti antichi. Alfabeti e documenti", in: Giovanna Gambacurta, Daniela Locatelli, Luigi Malnati, Patrizia Manessi, Anna Marinetti, Giovanna Luisa Ravagnan (Eds), Akeo. I tempi della scrittura. Veneti antichi: alfabeti e documenti, 157–275.