HU-2: Difference between revisions
From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
Sindy Kluge (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|sigla_mancini=INC-1 | |sigla_mancini=INC-1 | ||
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | |source=Schumacher 2004: 197 | ||
|checklevel= | |checklevel=0 | ||
}} | }} | ||
== Commentary == | == Commentary == | ||
First published in {{bib| | First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013. | ||
Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | Pictures in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 1 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}). | ||
Formerly HU-2 – the inscription was republished by {{bib|IR|Mancini}} as one of unknown provenance. | |||
The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status. | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 11:44, 24 June 2014
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | ?(?)u |
Original script: | or |
| |
Object: | HU-2 potsherd () |
Position: | foot, inside |
Script: | unknown |
Direction of writing: | ambiguous |
Letter height: | 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.2 cm |
Number of characters: | 2 – 3 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | incised |
Current condition: | complete, restored |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | unknown |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 69 LIR INC-1 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 197 |
Commentary
First published in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
Pictures in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442, fig. 1 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = LIR).
Formerly HU-2 – the inscription was republished by Mancini as one of unknown provenance.
The scratches can be arranged to read ua or uiθ – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.