HU-2: Difference between revisions

From Thesaurus Inscriptionum Raeticarum
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
|sigla_mancini=INC-1
|sigla_mancini=INC-1
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197
|source=Schumacher 2004: 197
|checklevel=1
|checklevel=0
|problem=see below -> notes
}}
}}
== Commentary ==
== Commentary ==
First published in {{bib|IR}}. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.
First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.


Pictures in {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}).
Pictures in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 1 (drawing) and {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = {{bib|LIR}}).
 
Formerly HU-2 – the inscription was republished by {{bib|IR|Mancini}} as one of unknown provenance.


The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.
The scratches can be arranged to read {{c||A7}}{{c||U2}} {{w||ua}} or {{c||Θ}}{{c||I}}{{c||U2}} {{w||uiθ}} – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See [[index::???|here]] for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.


Notes:
First published in {{bib|Torggler-Wöß 1953b}}: 442, fig. 1. Scratched after firing.
{{bibliography}}
{{bibliography}}

Revision as of 11:44, 24 June 2014

Inscription
Transliteration: ?(?)u
Original script: A7 sU2 s or Θ sI sU2 s

Object: HU-2 potsherd ()
Position: foot, inside
Script: unknown
Direction of writing: ambiguous
Letter height: 1.11.1 cm <br /> – 1.2 cm
Number of characters: 2 – 3
Number of lines: 1
Craftsmanship: incised
Current condition: complete, restored
Date of inscription:
Date derived from:

Language: unknown
Meaning: unknown

Alternative sigla: IR 69
LIR INC-1
Sources: Schumacher 2004: 197

Commentary

First published in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442. Autopsied by TIR in November 2013.

Pictures in Torggler-Wöß 1953b: 442, fig. 1 (drawing) and IR (photo tav. XLIX, fig. a and drawing = LIR).

Formerly HU-2 – the inscription was republished by Mancini as one of unknown provenance.

The scratches can be arranged to read A7 sU2 s ua or Θ sI sU2 s uiθ – the black inlay is misleading, as it does not fill the scratches completely. Probably non-script. See here for a discussion of possible interpretations of inscriptions with doubtful status.