NO-2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
First published in '''{{bib|Franz 1958b}}'''.<br> | First published in '''{{bib|Franz 1958b}}'''.<br> | ||
Further references: {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221.<br> | Further references: {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389, {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978}}: 221.<br> | ||
Pictures in {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing) = {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While '''{{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}}''' read ''pianusapau'' in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c|U|U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f|Mayr}} and in his succession {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978|Tibiletti Bruno}} proposed ''pianusapan'' with the hasta of {{c|N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer. While {{bib|Mayr 1960f|Mayr}} does not argue his point further, it is likely that he was thinking of the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] ''laθurus ipianus apanin''. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable SZ-16 suggests that the inscription might be either an unsophisticated imitation (the sieve | Pictures in {{bib|Mayr 1960f}}: 389 (drawing), {{bib|IR}} (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing) = {{bib|LIR}} (photo and drawing).<br>The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While '''{{bib|Franz 1958b|Franz}}''' read ''pianusapau'' in spite of the oddly misaligned {{c|U|U2}}, {{bib|Mayr 1960f|Mayr}} and in his succession {{bib|Tibiletti Bruno 1978|Tibiletti Bruno}} proposed ''pianusapan'' with the hasta of {{c|N}} missing due to a mistake by the writer. While {{bib|Mayr 1960f|Mayr}} does not argue his point further, it is likely that he was thinking of the inscription [[index::SZ-16]] ''laθurus ipianus apanin''. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable SZ-16 suggests that the inscription might be either an unsophisticated imitation (the sieve dates from the Roman period) or a forgery, in any case made by a person who knew SZ-16 but was unable to read it. (See {{bib|Schumacher 2004}}: 336.) | ||
{{bibliography}} | {{bibliography}} |
Revision as of 19:54, 19 December 2013
Inscription | |
---|---|
Transliteration: | pianusapau |
Original script: | |
| |
Object: | NO-2 sieve funnel () |
Position: | outside |
Script: | North Italic script |
Direction of writing: | sinistroverse |
Letter height: | 0.90.9 cm <br /> – 1.4 cm |
Number of letters: | 10 |
Number of lines: | 1 |
Craftsmanship: | engraved |
Current condition: | complete, restored |
Date of inscription: | |
Date derived from: | |
| |
Language: | unknown |
Meaning: | |
| |
Alternative sigla: | IR 75 LIR CL-2 |
Sources: | Schumacher 2004: 150, 336 |
Commentary
First published in Franz 1958b.
Further references: Mayr 1960f: 389, Tibiletti Bruno 1978: 221.
Pictures in Mayr 1960f: 389 (drawing), IR (photo tav. LII, fig. b and drawing) = LIR (photo and drawing).
The inscription, about 8.5 cm long, is located right under the rim and in good condition. While Franz read pianusapau in spite of the oddly misaligned , Mayr and in his succession Tibiletti Bruno proposed pianusapan with the hasta of missing due to a mistake by the writer. While Mayr does not argue his point further, it is likely that he was thinking of the inscription SZ-16 laθurus ipianus apanin. The fact that NO-2 represents an apparently nonsensical section of the well segmentable SZ-16 suggests that the inscription might be either an unsophisticated imitation (the sieve dates from the Roman period) or a forgery, in any case made by a person who knew SZ-16 but was unable to read it. (See Schumacher 2004: 336.)
Bibliography
Franz 1958b | Leonhard Franz, "Eine Inschrift aus Cles", Der Schlern 32 (1958), 39–40. |
---|---|
IR | Alberto Mancini, "Iscrizioni retiche", Studi Etruschi 43 (1975), 249–306. |
LIR | Alberto Mancini, Le Iscrizioni Retiche [= Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica, Università degli studi di Firenze Studi 8–9], Padova: Unipress 2009–10. (2 volumes) |